green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 1 distinct case ·
“sensible resolution”
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter Frampton Akindemowo v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See respectively Nason v. INS, 394 F.2d 223 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 830 , 89 S.Ct. 98 , 21 L.Ed.2d 101 (1968); Sawkow v. INS, 314 F.2d 34 (3d Cir.1963); * Wood v. Hoy, 266 F.2d 825 (9th Cir.1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olawale Balogun v. INS
See Nason ___ _____ v. INS, 394 F.2d 223 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 830 ___ ____________ (1968); Sawkow v. INS, 314 F.2d 34 (3d Cir. 1963). ______ ___ In Pacheco, however, we rejected the approach _______ upon which petitioner relies.
cited
Cited "see"
Balogun v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Nason v. I.N.S., 394 F.2d 223 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 830 , 89 S.Ct. 98 , 21 L.Ed.2d 101 (1968); Sawkow v. I.N.S., 314 F.2d 34 (3d Cir.1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George N. Milhim
See Grogan v. United States, 394 F.2d 287, 289 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 830 , 89 S.Ct. 97 , 21 L.Ed.2d 100 (1968) (double jeopardy is an affirmative defense which can be waived); Leser v. United States, 358 F.2d 313, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 385 U.S. 802 , 87 S.Ct. 10 , 17 L.Ed.2d 49 (1966) (stipulation to substitution of alternate juror constituted waiver).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bifield
See Fullbright v. United States, 392 F.2d 432 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 830 , 89 S.Ct. 97 , 21 L.Ed.2d 101 (1968) (federal agents did not violate Fourth Amendment rights of defendants when they observed defendants’ activities in a shed on a farm with the aid of binoculars); Commonwealth v. Hernley, 216 Pa.Super. 177 , 263 A.2d 904 (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 914 , 91 S.Ct. 886 , 27 L.Ed.2d 813 (1971) (FBI did not violate Fourth Amendment rights of defendants by observing events in their shop with the assistance of binoculars); see also Commonwealth v. Williams, 262 Pa.Super. 508…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Diaz
See Fullbright v United States (392 F2d 432, cert den 393 US 830 ), in which the court decided that the binocular observation, some 75 to 100 yards away, of the operation of a still within a shed and the loading of liquor into an automobile was not an illegal search under the theory of "open fields.” Where law enforcement officers have gained entry to a building by means of a trespass, surveillances made in the course of that trespass constitute an illegal search.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Romano
See Fullbright v. United States, 392 F.2d 432 , 434 n. 7 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 830 , 89 S.Ct. 97 , 21 L.Ed.2d 101 (1968), 4 W.
cited
Cited "see"
Thames v. Commonwealth
See Grogan v. United States, 394 F. 2d 287, 289-290 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. den. 393 U. S. 830 (1968); United States v. Brahm, 459 F. 2d 546, 550 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. den. sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eugene Anthony Nolan v. United States
See Fullbright v. United States, 392 F.2d 432, 435-436 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 830 , 89 S.Ct. 97 , 21 L.Ed.2d 101 ; United States v. Thompson, 409 F.2d 113, 117 (6th Cir. 1969); United States v. Masterson, 383 F.2d 610, 614 (2d Cir. 1967); Murray v. United States, 333 F.2d 409, 411 (10th Cir. 1964), vacated on other grounds, 380 U.S. 527 , 85 S.Ct. 1345 , 14 L.Ed.2d 266 (1965); United States v. Desist, 277 F.Supp. 690 (S.D.N.Y.1967), aff’d 384 F.2d 889 (2d Cir. 1967), aff’d on other grounds, 394 U.S. 244 , 89 S.Ct. 1030 , 22 L.Ed.2d 248 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lornitis v. State
Compare Williams v. United States, 391 F.2d 221 (5th Cir.1968), cert. den., 393 U.S. 830 , *459 89 S.Ct. 97 , 21 L.Ed.2d 100 (1968); United States v. Menichino, 497 F.2d 935 (5th Cir.1974); and see, generally, Kamisar, Brewer v. Williams, Massiah, and Miranda: What is Interrogation?
Grogan
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 142.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1968.
Hubert Humphrey for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.