green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.8 score
“uncontradicted" evidence that defendants "were willing to supply cocaine in large quantities and of excellent quality”
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Boller v. Kijakazi
it is inappropriate to consider arguments raised for 21 the first time in a reply brief.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Richard Anglada
uncontradicted" evidence that defendants "were willing to supply cocaine in large quantities and of excellent quality
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Denison v. O'Malley
Admin., 554 F.3d 1219 , 15 1226 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Bazuaye v. I.N.S., 79 F.3d 118, 120 (9th Cir.1996) 16 (“Issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are deemed waived.”); Thompson 17 v. Commissioner, 631 F.2d 642, 649 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 961 18 (1981) (“appellants cannot raise a new issue for the first time in their reply briefs”) 19 (citing U.S. v. Puchi, 441 F.2d 697, 703 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 20 (1971)); Ass’n of Irritated Residents v. C & R Vanderham Dairy, 435 F.Supp.2d 21 1 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Land v. O'Malley
Admin., 554 F.3d 1219, 1226 (9th Cir. 2009); see Thompson v. 15 Commissioner, 631 F.2d 642, 649 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 961 (1981) 16 (“appellants cannot raise a new issue for the first time in their reply briefs”) (citing 17 U.S. v. Puchi, 441 F.2d 697, 703 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 (1971)). 18 Furthermore, the Court finds no merit to these arguments as the ALJ’s findings were 19 not boilerplate and addressed supportability and consistency.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rhode Island Public Telecommunications Authority v. Rhode Island State Labor Relations Board
See generally Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 440 F.2d 7 , 10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 93 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971) (addressing whether employees promoted from technical to analyst positions were no longer qualified to be included in the technical unit).
discussed
Cited "see"
RI Pub. Tel. Auth. v. RI Labor Rel. Bd.
See generally Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 440 F.2d 7 , 10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 93 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971) (addressing whether employees promoted from technical to analyst positions were no longer qualified to be included in the technical unit).
cited
Cited "see"
Audrey M. Thompson, Florence Ain & Gregory Ain, Dorothy E. Kahan & Robert Kahan, Nana Berman & William Berman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See United States v. Puchi, 441 F.2d 697, 703 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 92 , 30 L.Ed.2d 92 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bert William Hunley, III
See United States v. Smallwood, 443 F.2d 535, 543 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 95 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilson Ramirez
See United States. v. Greenberg, 444 F.2d 369 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 93 , 30 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anderson
See United States v. Smallwood, 443 F.2d 535 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 95 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank John Bonanno
See, accord, United States v. Puchi, 441 F.2d 697 (9 Cir.), cert, denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 92 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 92 (1971); Holmes v. Burr, 486 F.2d 55 (Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramirez
See United States, v. Greenberg, 444 F.2d 369 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 93 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971); United States v. Cohen, 431 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1970); United States v. Bishop, 367 F.2d 806, 810 (2d Cir. 1966); United States v. Riley, 363 F.2d 955, 959 (2d Cir. 1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Malone
See United States v. Farrell, 443 F.2d 355, 356 (9th Cir. 1971), appeal pending, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 95 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Nieves and Edgar Edward Acosta
See United States v. Greenberg, 444 F.2d 369, 371-72 (2 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971); United States v. Henry, 417 F. 2d 267, 269-70 (2 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 953 (1970); United States v. Riley, 363 F.2d 955, 957-59 (2 Cir. 1966); United States v. Berry, 362 F.2d 756, 758 (2 Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pittman
See also id. (person wearing a mask, carrying a rifle, and forcing a hostage to accompany him to a bank, who could not get in because the bank door was locked, is taking a substantial step toward burglary and criminal trespass) (citing Rumfelt v. United States, 445 F.2d 134 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 (1971)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pittman
See also State v. Fernandez-Medina, 141 Wash.2d 448, 455 , 6 P.3d 1150 (2000) (clarifying that to satisfy the fact-based prong "the evidence must raise an inference that only the lesser included . . . offense was committed to the exclusion of the charged offense."). [18] RCW 9A.52.025(1). [19] RCW 9A.52.070(1). [20] RCW 9A.52.030(1). [21] 18 Wash.App. 686, 691 , 571 P.2d 237 (1977), review denied, 90 Wash.2d 1001 (1978). [22] 790 F.Supp. 223 (E.D.Dist.Wash.1992), aff'd, 24 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir.1994). [23] See West, 18 Wash.App. at 691 , 571 P.2d 237 (citing People v. Gibson, 94 Cal.App.2d 468 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holland v. Sterling Enterprises Inc.
“The receiver is an officer of the court and subject to its orders in relation to the property for which he is responsible until discharged by the court.” Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. PSL Realty Co., 630 F.2d 515, 521 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 3109 , 69 L.Ed.2d 971 (1981); see also United States v. Smallwood, 443 F.2d 535, 539 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 95 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971); Ledbetter v. Farmer’s Bank & Trust Co., 142 F.2d 147, 150 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 813 , 65 S.Ct. 112 , 89 L.Ed. 647 (1944); Jamaica Sav…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holland v. Sterling Enterprises
II. 8 The question before the court is whether the receiver, appointed to "locate, trace, maintain, and preserve any and all assets of [Woodcrest Apartments]," may appeal the district court's order denying his motion to intervene without the prior approval and permission of the district court. 9 "The receiver is an officer of the court and subject to its orders in relation to the property for which he is responsible until discharged by the court." Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. PSL Realty Co., 630 F.2d 515, 521 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 3109 , 69 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Season-All Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See e. g., Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. NLRB, 440 F.2d 7 , 9-10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 93 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971); U.S. Postal Services, 210 NLRB 477 , 488 (1974); Computer Systems, Inc., 204 NLRB 255 (1973). 57 Here, the Board's factual determination that the computer programmers are not "professional employees" is "supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole" 29 U.S.C. 160(f), and giving our usual deference to the Board's expertise in a classification context, we conclude that the Board did not err in its ruling.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pacific Southwest Airlines, and Pacific Southwest Airmotive v. National Labor Relations Board
Compare Boire v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 479 F.2d 778 (5th Cir. 1973) with Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. NLRB, 440 F.2d 7 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 93 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. West
See also Rumfelt v. United States, 445 F.2d 134 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 30 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur Meister and Dorothy Meister v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See, e. g., United States v. Smallwood, 443 F.2d 535 , 539-540 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 95 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971); McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 789 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965); Fairchild Stratos Corporation v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 337 F.2d 785, 794-795 (4th Cir. 1964); United States v. Goldberg, 330 F.2d 30, 43 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953 , 84 S.Ct. 1630 , 12 L.Ed.2d 497 (1964); cf. 4 Wigmore, Evidence § 1230 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Norman Archer
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Armiento, 445 F.2d 869 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 94 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971) ; Menendez v. United States, 393 F.2d 312 (5 Cir. 1968), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 572 (1969) ; McIntosh v. United States, 385 F.2d 274 (8 Cir. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edmund Rosner
See, e. g., United States v. Greenberg, 444 F.2d 369 (2 Cir.) cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 93 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971); United States v. Haley, 452 F.2d 398 (8 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1205 , 31 L.Ed.2d 253 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Beaulieu
See also, United States v. Farrell, 443 F.2d 355 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 95 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971); Wallace v. United States, 435 F.2d 12 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Kanner, 416 F.2d 522 (9th Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul Phillip Strauss
See, e. g., United States v. Smallwood, 443 F.2d 535, 540 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 95 , 30 L.Ed.2d 93 (1971); McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 789 (5th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed. 2d 71 (1965); United States v. Goldberg, 330 F.2d 30, 43 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953 , 84 S.Ct. 1630 , 12 L.Ed.2d 497 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People ex rel. Franklin v. Warden, Brooklyn House of Detention For Men
Realistically, this meant that, contrary to former law * * * calendar congestion, lack of facilities and virtually any other factor rendering it physically impossible to dispose of trial calendars within the prescribed periods constituted no excuse for the industrious metropolitan prosecutor ready to go to trial but unable to do so through circumstances beyond his control.” CPL 30.30 (subd. 5) represents a clear legislative disapproval of the intended effect of the promulgated rules and, in our opinion, left intact the prior decisional law that good cause for delay existed when the delay was…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Harry Schmidt, Jr.
See, e. g., United States v. Smallwood, 443 F.2d 535, 540 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 95 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 93 (1971); McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 789 (5th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965). 3.
Puchi
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 71-65.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1971.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.