green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
12.0 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases ·
"when a person knows her rights, and has even exercised the right to counsel, talking with counsel, later voluntary admissions can constitute a waiver of the rights to counsel and to remain silent"
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“USAFORM II”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 48 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
cadc 1977
Rockwell Corp., supra note 342; but see, Guy v. Robbins & Myers, Inc., 525 F.2d 124 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. granted, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1723 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976) 344 Reeb v. Economic Opportunity, Atlanta Inc., supra note 342, 516 F.2d at 931.
cited
Cited "but see"
Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Rockwell Corp., supra note 342; but see, Guy v. Robbins & Myers, Inc., 525 F.2d 124 (6th Cir. 1975), cert, granted, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1723 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976). .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Self v. Collins
when a person knows her rights, and has even exercised the right to counsel, talking with counsel, later voluntary admissions can constitute a waiver of the rights to counsel and to remain silent
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Michael Lloyd Self v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
when a person knows her rights, and has even exercised the right to counsel, talking with counsel, later voluntary admissions can constitute a waiver of the rights to counsel and to remain silent
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Shell v. Commonwealth
there is no requirement that an accused be continually reminded of his rights once he has intelligently waived them
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
James Mizell v. The Attorney General of the State of New York and Ano.
(2×)
to permit an appeal where there is failure to notify, without more, would be opposed to the clear wording and intent of rule 77(d).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charity v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See People v. McClellan, 29 Ill.App.3d 712 , 331 N.E.2d 292, 298 (1975) (stating that where a statute or rule provides for counsel-conducted voir dire, “no trial judge should totally prohibit direct questioning of prospective jurors by the parties or their attorneys”), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1723 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); 47 Am.Jur.2d Jury § 200, at 881 (1995) (“Where, under a local court rule, it is the duty of all trial judges to ... allow the parties or their attorneys a reasonable opportunity to supplement [voir dire ] examination, no trial judge should totally prohibi…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yanovitch
See United ___ ______ States v. Argentine, 814 F.2d 783, 788-89 (1st Cir. 1987) ______ _________ (quoting United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1167 (2d ______________ ______ Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 (1976)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Argentine, 814 F.2d 783, 788-89 (1st Cir.1987) (quoting United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1167 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976)).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland
See Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. USAFORM Hail Pool, Inc., 523 F.2d 744, 757 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
F.D.I.C. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
See Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. USAFORM Hail Pool, Inc., 523 F.2d 744, 757 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Person
Ed. 2d 87 (1979); People v. Godsey, 74 Ill. 2d 64, 73 , 383 N.E.2d 988 (1978); see United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1171 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S. Ct. 1724 , 48 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Wells v. State
See Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118, 122 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thaddeus Adonis Long, United States of America v. Edward Larry Jackson
(2×)
See United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1173 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976) (using Rule 901(a) as aid in case in which Federal Rules of Evidence had not yet become effective); see also, J.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re United States
See United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1167 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); United States v. Montiell, 526 F.2d 1008, 1010 (2d Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Coonan
See United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1167 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); United States v. Montiell, 526 F.2d 1008, 1010 (2d Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pressley v. State
See Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118 (5th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976); People v. Schenk, 24 Cal.App.3d 233 , 101 Cal.Rptr. 75 , (Cal.Ct.App.1972); Nettles v. State, 248 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); but see Maguire v. United States, 396 F.2d 327 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 , 89 S.Ct. 897 , 21 L.Ed.2d 792 (1969); State v. Gallagher, 36 Ohio App.2d 29 , 301 N.E.2d 888 (1973), reinstated, 46 Ohio St.2d 225 , 348 N.E.2d 336 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jerry L. King, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1171 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976) (denial of grand jury testimony upheld where witness had been continually available for interviewing).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Zayas
See Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118, 122 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S. Ct. 1724 , 48 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Bryant
See Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118, 122 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 (1976), and cases cited.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Mason Alexander
See United States v. Buchanan, 529 F.2d 1148, 1153 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976); Maguire v. United States, 396 F.2d 327 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 , 89 S.Ct. 897 , 21 L.Ed.2d 792 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
DeLuca v. State
See Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118 (5th Cir.1975), cert. den. 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976); Maguire v. United States, 396 F.2d 327 (9th Cir.1960); and U.S. ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Andujar
See Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118, 123 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sonia Vega
(2×)
To this end, limited questioning of witnesses by the trial judge is "entirely appropriate." United States v. Berardelli, 565 F.2d 24, 30 (2d Cir. 1977); see United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1170 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); See United States v. Williams, 575 F.2d 388, 392 (2d Cir. 1978) Indeed, such interrogation by the trial judge is specifically approved by the Federal Rules of Evidence, Fed.R.Evid. 614(b).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Isaac Rabinowitz
See United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1169 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arnold Nelson Mahler and Dean H. Ubben
See United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1169-70 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anne Lamont
See United States v. Lombardi, 550 F.2d 827, 829 (CA 2 1977), with cf. citations to United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160 , and see, e. g., 1169-1170 (CA 2 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976), and United States v. Tourine, 428 F.2d 865 , and see, e. g., 869-870 (CA 2 1970), cert. denied, sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Berardelli
See United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1170 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Al Taylor
(2×)
See United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1167 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); United States v. Tourine, 428 F.2d 865, 869-70 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 631 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Midland Bank & Trust Co. v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md.
See, Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Usaform Hail Pool, Inc., 523 F.2d 744, 757 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1977
See generally 11 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2864, at 214-15 (1973) 30 Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. USAFORM Hail Pool, Inc., 523 F.2d 744 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. John L.
The government can also rely on the contents of the letter to establish the identity of the declarant.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) United States v. Scurlock, 52 F.3d 531, 538 (5th Cir. 1995); see also United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1173 (2d Cir. 1975) (holding that for authentication, “[p]roof of the connection of an exhibit to the defendants may be made by circumstantial, as well as direct evidence”) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S. Ct. 1724 , 48 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Victor J. Orena, Also Known as Little Vic
And the prosecution need only prove a rational basis from which to conclude that the exhibit did, in fact, belong to the appellant[ ].” United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 167 (2d Cir.1984) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); see also United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1173 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Efraim Natanel A/K/A Efriam Natanel
See, e.g., United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1167 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); United States v. King, 521 F.2d 61, 63 (10th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. C.W. Fields, A/K/A William T. Neilley
See also United States v. Kilgore, 518 F.2d 496, 498 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); 5 J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Exxon Corp. v. United States
See, e.g., Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. USAFORM Hail Pool, Inc., 523 F.2d 744, 759 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vito Spillone, United States of America v. John Clyde Abel, United States of America v. Frank Citro
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1168 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); Nakaladski, 481 F.2d at 298 ; United States v. DeStafano, 429 F.2d 344, 347 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 972 , 91 S.Ct. 1656 , 29 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Francisco Larranaga
See United States v. De La Luz Gallegos, 738 F.2d 378, 382 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 574 , 83 L.Ed.2d 514 (1984); United States v. Bridwell, 583 F.2d 1135, 1138 (10th Cir.1978); see also United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1171 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. LTV Corp.
Compare Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118, 121-22 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Accident And Indemnity Company v. The Ltv Corporation
Compare Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118, 121-22 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John W. Sliker, John Carbone, and Theodore Buchwald, A/K/A \Bucky
See also United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1167-68 (2d Cir. 1975) (judge’s statements that there was no dispute as to two elements of the offense not erroneous where judge charged the jury that it had to find facts establishing every element beyond a reasonable doubt), *486 cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950, 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Brown
See also United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1167 (2d Cir. 1975) (“not even undisputed fact may be removed from the jury’s consideration, either by direction or by omission in the charge”), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
See also United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160 at 1173 (2d Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); United States v. Smith, 609 F.2d 1294, 1301 (9th Cir. 1979). 30 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilbur P. Bolius v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, State of Florida
Compare Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections, 1978, 434 U.S. 257 , 98 S.Ct. 556 , 54 L.Ed.2d 521 , and In re Morrow, 5 Cir. 1974, 502 F.2d 520 with Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. USAFORM Hail Pool, Inc., 5 Cir. 1975, 523 F.2d 744 , cert. denied, 1976, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 , and Smith v. Jackson Tool & Die, Inc., 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 5 (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Buckeye Cellulose Corporation v. Braggs Electric Construction Co.
Compare Morrow v. Planters’ Trust and Savings Bank, supra, with Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Usaform Hail Pool, Inc., 523 F.2d 744, 747-51 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bernard G. Rubin
See also United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); *983 United States v. Glasser, 443 F.2d 994, 1004-06 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 854 , 92 S.Ct. 96 , 30 L.Ed.2d 95 (1971). 2 The conclusion of these two courts that a defense witness’s prior silence before a grand jury and trial testimony exculpating the defendant lack sufficient inconsistency to justify impeachment use of the silence is well-founded.
International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Local 790
v.
Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Guy v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.
v.
Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Guy v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.
No. 75-1264; No. 75-1276.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1976.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2) · Fifth Circuit (2) · M.D. Florida (1) · Court of Appeals of Virginia (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases consolidated and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 525 F. 2d 124.