green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944
1985
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
Statutes must be construed “in the light of the conditions obtaining at the time of their enactment.” Judson Mills v. South Carolina Unemployment Compensation Comm’n, 204 S. C. 37, 41, 28 S. E. (2d) 535, 537 (1944). “[A] statute will be construed as bearing the same meaning as the original statute or section unless [the later statute] plainly requires a change of construction to conform to the manifest intent of the legislature.” South Carolina Elec. and Gas Co. v. Public Serv.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hollingsworth v. DIST. OF COL. UNEMP. COMP.
Comm'n, 204 S.C. 37 , 42, 28 S.E.2d 535, 537 (1944).] Accord, Ford Motor Co. v. Appeal Bd. of Mich. Unemp.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hollingsworth v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
Comm’n, 204 S.C. 37 , 42, 28 S.E.2d 535, 537 (1944).] Accord, Ford Motor Co. v. Appeal Bd. of Mich. Unemp.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Faile v. South Carolina Employment Security Commission
(2×)
The Court regarded the Unemployment Compensation Law as: (1) a 1936 response to the Depression; and (2) an attack upon “involuntary unemployment” (204 S. C. at 40, 28 S. E. (2d) at 536).
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. Dobbs House, Inc.
See Judson Mills v. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n. (1944) 104 S.C. 37 , 28 S.E.2d 535 .
examined
Cited "see"
Sherbert v. Verner
(5×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Judson Mills v. South Carolina Unemployment Compensation Comm’n, 204 S. C. 37, 28 S. E. 2d 535 ; Hartsville Cotton Mill v. South Carolina Employment Security Comm’n, 224 S. C. 407, 79 S. E. 2d 381 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Judson Mills
v.
South Carolina Unemployment Compensation Commission
v.
South Carolina Unemployment Compensation Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jan 3, 1944.
Mr. James Julien Bush and Mr. Robert G. Horine , both of Columbia, S.C. Counsel for Defendants-Appellants, cite: As to review by Court of a Finding Of Fact Of the Commission:
Code of S.C. Secs. 7035-87(i); 200 S.C. 315 , 20 S.E.2d 865 ; 137 F.2d 531 ; 219 N.C. 305 , 13 S.E.2d 544 ; (Ga.), 13 S.E.2d 863 ; 114 P.2d 164 ; 114 P.2d 995 . As to Claimant Being \Available for work\" within purview of Act: 1 So.2d 305; 45 N.E.2d 152 ; Sec. 7035-87(c) (1) of Code of S.C.; Sec. 7035-82 of Code of S.C.; Sec. 7035-82(c) (1) of Code of S.C.; Sec. 7035-99(k) of Code of S.C. As to Claimant Being Entitled To Compensation Even Though Not Available For Exact Job She Had Been Doing: Sec. 7035-82
<italic>Per Curiam:</italic>.
Code of S.C. As to Benefits Paid To Claimant Being Charged to Experience Rating Of Employer: Sec. 7035-87 (c) (1)
January 3, 1944. This is an appeal from a decree of Honorable G. Dewey Oxner, Judge of the Thirteenth Circuit. With that decree this Court finds itself in agreement. The conclusions reached by Judge Oxner are entirely proper and correct.
The appeal must be dismissed.