green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commonwealth v. Cinelli
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Under such circumstances, a defendant may be deprived of the right to counsel.” Id. at 861.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Violet Bruce
(2×)
See United States v. Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260, 1265 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260 , 1262 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979) (finding that claims that “the applicable statute is unconstitutional or that the indictment fails to state an offense” are jurisdictional claims); United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. at 575 , 109 S.Ct. at 765 (clarifying that the limited application of this exception should be to cases where a judge can determine from the face of the indictment and record at the time of accepting the guilty plea that the government lacked the power to bring the indictment).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin
See United States v. Runge, 593 F.2d 66, 73-74 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin
See United States v. Runge, 593 F.2d 66, 73-74 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Belton v. United States
This holding is consistent with what appears to be the general rule in the federal courts: that “entry through an open door is not a ‘breaking’ within the meaning of the federal knock and announce statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3109 .” United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 732 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985); accord, e.g., United States v. Bethea, 598 F.2d 331, 334 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 81 (1979); United States v. Lopez, 475 F.2d 537, 541 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 839 , 94 S.Ct. 89 , 38 L.E…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James A. Bohn
See United States v. Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260 , 1262 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Thomas Depew
See United States v. Bethea, 598 F.2d 331, 333-34 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 81 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
St. Cloud v. United States
See Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 ; Goforth, 644 P.2d at 116 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bouthot
Accord United States v. Frederick, 583 F.2d 273, 274 (6th Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl Estabrook
See United States v. Runge, 593 F.2d 66, 73 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
John Wesley Clutchette v. Ruth Rushen
United States v. Irwin, 612 F.2d 1182, 1186-87 (9th Cir.1980); see United States v. Glover, 596 F.2d 857, 863-64 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 81 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Scott v. Foltz
See United States v. Runge, 593 F.2d 66 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979); United States v. Turner, 490 F.Supp. 583, 598-599 (E.D.Mich.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donovan v. A.A. Beiro Construction Co.
Accord United States v. Bethea, 598 F.2d 331, 335 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 81 (1979) (Matlock looked not to presence or absence of party but to whether party assumed the risk that another might consent to the search); United States v. Canada, 527 F.2d 1374, 1379 (9th Cir.1975) (same), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 177 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1984
Accord United States v. Bethea, 598 F.2d 331, 335 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 81 (1979) (Matlock looked not to presence or absence of party but to whether party assumed the risk that another might consent to the search); United States v. Canada, 527 F.2d 1374, 1379 (9th Cir.1975) (same), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 177 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976). 5 Beiro does, however, argue that the clause of the contract, defining the "contracting officer" as including that official's authorized representative, was not offered into evidence at the hearing and th…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelps
See United States v. Arguelles, 594 F.2d 109 , 112 n. 3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 81 (1979); United States v. Chandler, 586 F.2d 593, 606 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 927 , 99 S.Ct. 1262 , 59 L.Ed.2d 483 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dan Phelps, A/K/A Al, A/K/A Sly Fox, Sally Phelps, A/K/A Ginger, A/K/A Rachel, A/K/A Linda, A/K/A Ann
See United States v. Arguelles, 594 F.2d 109 , 112 n. 3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 81 (1979); United States v. Chandler, 586 F.2d 593, 606 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 927 , 99 S.Ct. 1262 , 59 L.Ed.2d 483 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramon Torres and Tony Fish
See United States v. Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260, 1262-63 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979); United States v. Indian Boy X, 565 F.2d 585, 594 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 841 , 99 S.Ct. 131 , 58 L.Ed.2d 139 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
William Edward Sodders v. Robert Parratt and Paul Douglas
See United States v. Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260, 1262 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979)..
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Provenzano
See United States v. Runge, 593 F.2d 66, 74 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shane Arthur James
See also United States v. Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerry Lockhart
See also United States v. Arguelles, 594 F.2d 109, 111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 81 (1979); United States v. Jensen, 561 F.2d 1297, 1300 (8th Cir.1977) (transporting a fugitive via speedboat down the Mississippi).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yeatts v. Commonwealth
See Simpson v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 557, 564 , 318 S.E.2d 386, 390 (1984) (defendant with IQ of 78 but with good “street *131 sense” was capable of understanding his rights and intelligently waiving them); see also United States v. Glover, 596 F.2d 857, 866 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 (1979) (waiver valid because of defendant’s prior experience with police even though his IQ of 67 was in bottom one percentile of society); People v. Williams, 62 N.Y.2d 285, 288-89 , 465 N.E.2d 327, 328-29 , 476 N.Y.S.2d 788, 789-90 (1984) (defendant who understood immediate import of Miranda w…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
Compare United States v. Joseph, 11 M.J. 333, 335 (C.M.A. 1981), with United States v. Gipson, 835 F.2d 1323 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2038 , 100 L.Ed.2d 623 (1988), United States v. Taylor, 814 F.2d 172 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct 186 , 98 L.Ed.2d 138 (1987), and United States v. Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979). 6 This general waiver rule has appli cation to certain protections otherwise afforded by the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Correll v. Commonwealth
See Simpson v. Com monwealth., 227 Va. 557, 564 , 318 S.E.2d 386, 390 (1984) (defendant with IQ of 78 but with good “street sense” was capable of understanding his rights and intelligently waiving them); see also United States v. Glover, 596 F.2d 857, 866 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 (1979) (waiver valid because of defendant’s prior experience with police even though his IQ of 67 was in bottom one percentile of society); People v. Williams, 62 N.Y.2d 285, 288-89 , 465 N.E.2d 327, 328-29 , 476 N.Y.S.2d 788, 789-90 (1984) (defendant who understood immediate import of Miranda warn…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeffrey Scott Webster
See, e.g., United States v. Runge, 593 F.2d 66, 69-70 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 123 , 62 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Lee Morrow
Compare United States v. Bethea, 598 F.2d 331, 335 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Gerald Jordan v. John C. Watkins, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
(2×)
See e.g., United States v. Arguelles, 594 F.2d 109 , 112 n.3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 860 , 100 S.Ct. 124 , 62 L.Ed.2d 81 (1979).
Crowe
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-6859.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.