green
Positive treatment
13.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Barbara Z. Ex Rel. Devin Z. v. Obradovich
See, e.g., City of South Lake Tahoe v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 625 F.2d 231, 233-34 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1039 , 101 S.Ct. 619 , 66 L.Ed.2d 502 (1980); Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067 (11th Cir.1986), modified, 798 F.2d 425 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d *723 833 (1987); City of Trenton v. State of New Jersey, 262 U.S. 182 , 43 S.Ct. 534 , 67 L.Ed. 937 (1923); Williams v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 289 U.S. 36 , 53 S.Ct. 431 , 77 L.Ed. 1015 (1933); but cf. Santiago, 721 F.Supp. at 393 (…
examined
Cited "see"
Ross v. State
(4×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 715 (5th Cir.) (considering weight of evidence against defendants in determining prejudice of extrinsic evidence), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979)." 733 F.2d at 1440-41 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,786 United States of America v. Edward L. Ruggiero and Christopher S. Parker
(2×)
Finally, the defendants contend that the fact that only one juror had this information did not mitigate its prejudicial effect because the defendants were entitled to a unanimous verdict. *652 We often have stated that “[i]n any trial there is initially a presumption of jury impartiality.” United States v. O’Keefe, 722 F.2d 1175, 1179 (5th Cir.1983); accord United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 714 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruggiero
We often have stated that "[i]n any trial there is initially a presumption of jury impartiality." United States v. O'Keefe, 722 F.2d 1175, 1179 (5th Cir. 1983); accord United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 714 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Baptista-Rodriguez, Ramon Calvo, and Julio R. Diaz
(2×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 710 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandoval
(2×)
Accord United States v. Eldred, 588 F.2d 746, 752 (9th Cir.1978) (incorporating Cavness v. United States, 187 F.2d 719, 722 (9th Cir.1951)) (“faithful performance of [jurors’] official duties' are presumed.”) Although this is a rebuttable presumption, prejudice should be demonstrated by the defendant “by a preponderance of the credible evidence.” United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 714 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Caro-Quintero
(2×)
See, U.S. v. Gaffney, 676 F.Supp. 1544, 1550 (M.D.Fla.1987) (citing U.S. v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 714 (5th Cir.)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979) and U.S. v. Riley, 544 F.2d 237, 242 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1554 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shearn Moody, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 712 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. *331 51, 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979); Turner v. United States, 441 F.2d 736, 739 (5th Cir.1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard W. Miller
(2×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 710 (5tb Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979); United States v. Sisto, 534 F.2d 616, 622-23 (5th Cir.1976). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mayette
See United States v. Goins, 593 F.2d 88, 91 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S. Ct. 52 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Marin Operating, Inc.
The Board is reluctant to disturb units established by collective bargaining so long as those units are not repugnant to Board policy or so constituted as to hamper employees in fully exercising rights guaranteed by the Act.” Buffalo Broadcasting Co., 242 N.L.R.B. 1105 , 1106 n. 2 (1979); accord Bay Medical Center, Inc. v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1174, 1177 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 53 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979); see also Pacific Southwest Airlines v. NLRB, 587 F.2d 1032, 1045 (9th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1987
The Board is reluctant to disturb units established by collective bargaining so long as those units are not repugnant to Board policy or so constituted as to hamper employees in fully exercising rights guaranteed by the Act." Buffalo Broadcasting Co., 242 N.L.R.B. 1105 , 1106 n. 2 (1979); accord Bay Medical Center, Inc. v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1174, 1177 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 53 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979); see also Pacific Southwest Airlines v. NLRB, 587 F.2d 1032, 1045 (9th Cir.1978). 10 The ALJ determined that the units represented by the unions were the historically r…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Means
(2×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 710 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979); United States v. Davis, 22 M.J. 651 , 653 n.3 (A.C.M.R. 1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca11 1986
(2×)
See Fed.R.Evid. 803(8) advisory committee note 9 The Eleventh Circuit, in Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir.1981) (en banc), adopted as precedent decisions of the former Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981 10 Federal Rule of Evidence 103(a)(2) cautions that error may not be predicated upon a ruling excluding evidence unless "the substance of the evidence was made known to the court by offer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked." United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 710 (5th Cir.) (quoting Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(2)), cert. denied, …
discussed
Cited "see"
Dominic Marchese v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.
(2×)
We begin our analysis by considering the arbitration agreement. “[A] party cannot be compelled to arbitrate any matter in the absence of a contractual obligation to do so.” Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, AFL-CIO, 430 U.S. 243, 250-51 , 97 S.Ct. 1067, 1071-72 , 51 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); see Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd., 593 F.2d 857, 861 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brantley
(2×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 715 (5th Cir.) (considering weight of evidence against defendants in determining prejudice of extrinsic evidence), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brantley
(2×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 715 (5th Cir.) (considering weight of evidence against defendants in determining prejudice of extrinsic evidence), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allegheny County Sanitary Authority v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Rogers v. Brockette, 588 F.2d 1057, 1067-70 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979) 4 As Pennhurst II cautioned, "the scope of any such relief would be constrained by principles of comity and federalism." --- U.S. at --- n. 13, 104 S.Ct. at 910 n. 13.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of South Portland v. State
See Rogers v. Brochette, 588 F.2d 1057, 1070 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979) (Supremacy Clause may empower Congress to give municipalities statutory rights protected against State interference).
cited
Cited "see"
Allegheny County Sanitary Authority v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Rogers v. Brochette, 588 F.2d 1057, 1067-70 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corporation
(2×)
Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 , 57 S.Ct. 163, 165-66 , 81 L.Ed. 153, 158-59 (1936); accord Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd., 593 F.2d 857, 864 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp.
(2×)
Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 , 57 S.Ct. 163, 165-66 , 81 L.Ed. 153, 158-59 (1936); accord Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd., 593 F.2d 857, 864 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nunziato Fusaro, United States v. Richard R. Saccone, United States v. Richard E. Robidoux
(2×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 712 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
examined
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Johnny Veal v. Richard Derobertis
(4×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 710 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board
See Bay Medical Center, Inc. v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1174, 1177-78 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 53 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board
See Bay Medical Center, Inc. v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1174, 1177-78 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 53 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Claude Leander Riley
(2×)
See United States v. Goins, 593 F.2d 88, 91 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979); United States v. Love, supra, 592 F.2d at 1024-26 ; United States v. Lilley, supra, 581 F.2d at 187-88 ; cf. Witham v. Mabry, 596 F.2d 293, 296-97 (8th Cir. 1979) (habeas corpus).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. August W. Durnin
(2×)
See United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979); United States v. Sadler, 488 F.2d 434 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 2642 (1974); United States v. Doe, 488 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 991 , 94 S.Ct. 2400 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 (1974). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ruiz-Pacheco
(2×)
See, e.g., Mill v. State, 585 P.2d 546 , 552 n.4 (Alaska 1978) (‘‘[i]n marginal cases doubts should be resolved against turning a single trans- action into multiple offenses’’), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S. Ct. 51 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Siegelman
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 714 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979) (When confronted with a motion for new trial predicated on an argument that a defendant’s right to an impartial jury has been violated, a court must start with the presumption that the jury has been impartial and unbiased.); United States v. Robbins, 500 F.2d 650, 653 (5th Cir.1974) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Appeal of Cornerstone Television Inc.
See e.g., Rogers v. Brockette, 588 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979) (local school district had capacity to challenge constitutionality of state statute under supremacy clause); San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco, 457 F. Supp. 283 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of New Rochelle v. Town of Mamaroneck
See, e.g., Rogers v. Brockette, 588 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979) (local school district had capacity to challenge constitutionality of state statute under Supremacy Clause); San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco, 457 F.Supp. 283 (S.D.Cal.1978) aff'd 651 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982) (political subdivision can challenge constitutionality of state legislation under Supremacy clause).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hotze v. Brown
(2×)
See id.; see also Rogers v. Brockette, 588 F.2d 1057, 1060 (5 th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Branson School District RE-82 v. Romer
See, e.g., Rogers v. Brockette, 588 F.2d 1057, 1067-71 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979); Santiago Collazo v. Franqui Acosta, 721 F.Supp. 385, 393 (D.P.R.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indian Oasis-Baboquivari Unified School District No. 40 v. Kirk
See, e.g., Rogers v. Brockette, 588 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir.) (recognizing school district’s standing to bring a Supremacy Clause challenge to a state law requiring school district to participate in a federally-subsidized school breakfast program), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979); San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco, 457 F.Supp. 283 (S.D.Cal.1978), aff'd on other grounds, 651 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indian Oasis-Baboquivari Unified School District No. 40 Of Pima County, Arizona v. Kirk
See, e.g., Rogers v. Brockette, 588 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir.) (recognizing school district's standing to bring a Supremacy Clause challenge to a state law requiring school district to participate in a federally-subsidized school breakfast program), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979); San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco, 457 F.Supp. 283 (S.D.Cal.1978), aff'd on other grounds, 651 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
California Pacific Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical Center
See, e.g., Bay Medical Ctr., Inc. v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1174, 1178 (6th Cir.1978) (upholding a Board decision that the policy against disrupting existing bargaining relationships outweighed the policy against proliferating unions in the health care industry), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 53 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert H. Hopkins, Jr., Morten Hopkins, and John W. Harrell
(2×)
See also United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 708 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dymowski
(4×)
Rule 103(a)(2), N.D.R.Ev; See also United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979) (error may not be based on a ruling excluding evidence unless the substance of the evidence was made known to the court by an offer of proof or was apparent from the context within which the questions were asked).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Sampson, D/B/A Sampson Associates v. Eaton Corporation
(2×)
Id. at 267 n. 2; see also United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 710 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Davis
(2×)
Compare United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 710 (5th Cir.) (absent an adequate offer of proof, court will “not even consider the propriety of the decision to exclude the evidence at issue”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979), with United States v. Martin, 694 F.2d 885, 889 (1st Cir.1982); Ellis v. City of Chicago, 667 F.2d 606, 612 (7th Cir.1981); United States v. Polk, 550 F.2d 1265, 1268 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 838 , 98 S.Ct. 129 , 54 L.Ed.2d 100 (1977) (courts examined for plain error where no offer of proof made, but found no plain error).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
South MacOmb Disposal Authority v. Township of Washington
See, e.g., Rogers v. Brockette, 588 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979) (local school district had capacity to challenge constitutionality of state statute under supremacy clause); 9 San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco, 457 F.Supp. 283 (S.D.Cal.1978), aff'd, 651 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982) (political subdivision can challenge constitutionality of state legislation under Supremacy clause); 10 see also Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339, 342-47 , 81 S.Ct. 125, 127-30 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
South Macomb Disposal Authority v. Township of Washington
See, e.g., Rogers v. Brockette, 588 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979) (local school district had capacity to challenge constitutionality of state statute under supremacy clause); 9 San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco, 457 F.Supp. 283 (S.D.Cal.1978), aff'd, 651 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982) (political subdivision can challenge constitutionality of state legislation under Supremacy clause); 10 see also Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339, 342-47 , 81 S.Ct. 125, 127-30 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jope v. Bear Stearns & Co.
(2×)
Section 3 of the Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3 , provides, “If any suit or proceeding be brought in any of the courts of the United States upon any issue referable to arbitration under an agreement in writing for such arbitration, the court in which such suit is pending ... shall on application of one of the parties stay the trial of the action until such arbitration has been had in accordance with the terms of the agreement ...” *144 Where plaintiffs assert both arbitrable and nonarbitrable claims, district courts have, “discretion whether to proceed with the nonarbitrable claims befor…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rita M. Lavelle
(2×)
See also United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 710 (5th Cir.) (inadequate offer of proof barred consideration on appeal), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979); United States v. Muncy, 526 F.2d 1261, 1263 (5th Cir. 1976) (lack of offer of proof resulted in refusal to consider propriety of exclusion on appeal). 8 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH, ETC. v. United States
See also United States v. McGuirt, 588 F.2d 419, 421 (4th Cir.1978) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 52 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Trustees of the Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. National Labor Relations Board
Compare Bay Medical Center, Inc. v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1174 (6th Cir.1978) (technical unit excluding LPNs), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 53 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
The Trustees Of The Masonic Hall And Asylum Fund v. National Labor Relations Board
Compare Bay Medical Center, Inc. v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1174 (6th Cir.1978) (technical unit excluding LPNs), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 53 , 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979).
Williams
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-1581.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.