green
Positive treatment
12.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 48 distinct citers.
discussed
Limited
United States v. Thomas Hartwell Liles, Michael Harold Jones, John Richard Salane
(2×)
Their three challenges to the authority of the Coast Guard to stop and board the vessel have been foreclosed by United States v. One (1) 43 Foot Sailing Vessel, 405 F.Supp. 879, 882-83 (S.D.Fla.1975) (Coast Guard has authority under 14 U.S.C. § 89 (a) to stop and board American vessels on the high seas), aff’d per curiam, 538 F.2d 694 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Jonas, 639 F.2d 200, 202-03 (5th Cir. 1981) (boarding of American vessels by the Coast Guard on the high seas need not be predicated upon reasonable suspicion); and United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 , 885 & n.37 (5th Cir.)…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dube v. The State University Of New York
But see Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 590 F.2d 470 , 485 (3d Cir.1978) (professor seeking tenure held to have property interest in procedures established by college's statement of policy), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dube v. State University of New York
But see Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 590 F.2d 470 , 485 (3d Cir.1978) (professor seeking tenure held to have property interest in procedures established by college’s statement of policy), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Noriega
United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862, 876 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct.. 61, 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Authority of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to Override International Law in Extraterritorial Law Enforcement Activities
It held that the statute granting the power to search and seize vessels m all cases in “‘which the United States has jurisdiction,’" for purposes o f enforcing United States law, granted authonty to the Coast Guard to seize vessels in violation o f Article 22 o f the Convention on the High Seas Id. at 884 (quot ing 14 U S C. § 89(a) (1976)).
cited
Cited "see"
Baker v. General Motors Corporation
See English v. 21st Phoenix Corp., 590 F.2d 723, 728 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Kenneth Lee Baker v. General Motors Corp.
See English v. 21st Phoenix Corp., 590 F.2d 723, 728 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grimm
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 590 F.2d 470 , 479 (3d Cir.1978) (“[A] change in legal standards may warrant the reopening of a case where addi *108 tional' testimony would be pertinent to the change of law.”) (concluding, however, that the asserted change did not warrant a reopening of the record), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979); Still v. Rossville Bank (In re Chattanooga Wholesale Antiques, Inc.), 78 B.R. 162, 165 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1987) (“A change in or clarification of the law has been recognized as a ground for re-opening the proof.”), aff'd, 930 F…
discussed
Cited "see"
Veldhoen v. United States Coast Guard
(2×)
See United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862, 873 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, Postal v. United States, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); See also Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. Maxwell, 468 F.2d 1326, 1334 (2nd Cir.1972) cited in Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Elec.
cited
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Texaco Refining And Marketing, Inc.
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470, 478 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470, 478 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dempsey Buford Merida
(2×)
See United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Romarico S. More v. Intelcom Support Services, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862, 883 (5th Cir.) (article 6 of the Convention on the High Seas is not self-executing), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Noriega
(2×)
See United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); United States v. Cadena, 585 F.2d 1252 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Winter, 509 F.2d 975 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 825 , 96 S.Ct. 39 , 46 L.Ed.2d 41 (1975); Rivard v. United States, supra. More recently, international law principles have expanded to permit jurisdiction upon a mere showing of intent to produce effects in this country, without requiring proof of an overt act or effect within the United States.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ritterbusch v. Holt
See Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank and Trust Co., 576 S.W.2d 310, 312 (Mo. banc 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); Concerned Parents v. Caruthersville School District 18, 548 S.W.2d 554, 558 (Mo. banc 1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Romero v. City of Pomona
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 590 F.2d 470 , 479 (3rd Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979); 6A J.
cited
Cited "see"
Romero v. City Of Pomona
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 590 F.2d 470 , 479 (3rd Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979); 6A J.
cited
Cited "see"
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Muegler
See Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank & Trust Co., 576 S.W.2d 310, 312 (Mo. banc 1978), cert. den., 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Windfelder v. Rosen (In Re Windfelder)
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470 (3rd Cir.1978) cert. denied 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1978); Rochez Brothers, Inc. v. Rhoades, 527 F.2d 891 (3rd Cir.1975) cert. denied 425 U.S. 993 , 96 S.Ct. 2205 , 48 L.Ed.2d 817 (1976). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Opinion No. Oag 19-87, (1987)
See United States v. State of New Mexico , 590 F.2d 323 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied , 444 U.S. 832 (1979); see also McDonnell, Federal and State Regulation of Gambling and Liquor Sales within Indian Country . 8 Hamline L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Milton Hawkins
(2×)
See Benner v. Oswald, 592 F.2d 174, 181 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 62 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Wickliffe v. Duckworth
See U.S. v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); U.S. v. Grismore, 546 F.2d 844 (10th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Eduardo Herrera
(4×)
Accord United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862, 889 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rice v. Rehner
(2×)
See United States v. New Mexico, 590 F. 2d 323 (CA10 1978), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 832 (1979). 8 Because nothing in the language or legislative history of § 1161 indicates any intent to confer licensing authority on the States, I would hold that California’s attempt to require Indian traders to obtain state liquor licenses is pre-empted by federal law.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Starfish Condominium Ass'n v. Yorkridge Service Corp.
See United States v. Fresno Unified School District, 592 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S. Ct. 62 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Transportes Aeros Mercantiles Panamericanos v. Boyatt
United States v. Morrow, 537 F.2d 120, 139-141 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 1602 , 51 L.Ed.2d 806 (1977); Birdsell v. United States, 346 F.2d 775, 783 (5th Cir.1965); United States v. Toscanino, 500 F.2d at 280 ; See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258 , 1265 n. 9 (5th Cir.1979), reh. denied, 594 F.2d 241 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (cases cited therein).
discussed
Cited "see"
Litigation Authority of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Title VII Suits Against State and Local Governmental Entities
See General Telephone Co. o f the Northwest v. EEOC, 446 U.S. 318 , 324 & n.6 (1980) (in describing the statutory scheme of Title VII, the Court stated that § 2000e-5(f)(l) “specifi cally authorizes the EEOC to bring a civil action against any respondent not a governm ental entity upon failure to secure an acceptable conciliation agree ment,” and added that “[t]he Attorney General is authorized to bring suit against a governmental entity”), (emphasis added).7 See also United States v. Fresno Unified School D ist., 592 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 832 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Webster Groce, Charles John Chisolm
(2×)
See United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 , 886 n.41 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rehner v. Rice
See United States v. New Mexico, 590 F.2d 323, 329 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 63 , 62 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979), (summarily dismissing New Mexico’s contention that the twenty-first amendment permits state liquor licensing on Indian reservations).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1982
See United States v. New Mexico, 590 F.2d 323, 329 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 63 , 62 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979), (summarily dismissing New Mexico's contention that the twenty-first amendment permits state liquor licensing on Indian reservations).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Green
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Purex Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co. And Clorox Co.
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 590 F.2d 470 , 478 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
examined
Cited "see"
Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinea v. Insurance Company of North America
(4×)
See English v. 21st Phoenix Corp., 590 F.2d 723 , 728 n.5 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979); In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation, 480 F.Supp. 1138, 1151 (N.D.Ill.1979). 15 By October 25, 1978, the insurance companies were in violation of the order and asked for an additional thirty days to comply, representing to the court that "(c)ounsel has sought to secure the information necessary to answer plaintiff's interrogatories and will probably be able to complete the answers within thirty days from this date." 4 App. at 309a. (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Leslie Busche, Cross-Appellant v. Wallace E. Burkee, Cross-Appellee
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470, 494 (3rd Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979); Jones v. Snead, 431 F.2d 1115, 1117 (8th Cir. 1970). 10 Busche also challenges the dismissal of Bosman from this action.
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Luftek, Inc.
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 590 F.2d 470 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Meacham, Joseph Ward, Edward William Gilroy, Bobby Gene Hayes and Donald L. Metsger
(2×)
See United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); United States v. Caro, 569 F.2d 411 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. DiRodio, 565 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Entertainment Concepts, Inc. v. Maciejewski
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470, 494-96 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca7 1980
See Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470, 494-96 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979). 65 Neither party had the opportunity to argue below how an appropriate award could be framed.
cited
Cited "see"
Petition for Naturalization of Antonio Olegario v. United States
See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1266 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Egan
(2×)
See United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 , 868 n. 8 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Glenn Peters
See United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Gunnar Williams
(2×)
No. 5200 (entered into force Sept. 30, 1962); see United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862, 868-69 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); Carmichael, At Sea With the Fourth Amendment, 32 U.Miami L.Rev. 51, 58 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John Martins
(2×)
It "is an inchoate offense, the essence of which is an agreement to commit an unlawful act." Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770, 777 , 95 S.Ct. 1284, 1289 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616, 622 (1975); Accord, United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1269 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979). 83 As the majority opinion makes clear, the defendants were charged with entering into only one agreement, and only one agreement was proved; that agreement had two objectives, importing marijuana and distributing it. 1 Though the charge described overt acts, it was unnecessary …
cited
Cited "see"
West v. Williamsport Area Community College
See generally Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470 , 477 n.2 (3rd Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979). 12 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Claude Hubert Davis and Floyd Byron Bishop
United States v. Cadena, 585 F.2d 1252, 1257-58 (5th Cir. 1978); see United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 , 886 n.39 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Watson v. State
Young v. State, 451 So.2d 208, 210 (Miss.1984); see also U.S. v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
Postal
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-1714.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.