green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 46 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Flickinger v. Harold C. Brown & Co., Inc.
... a clearing agent ... is generally under no fiduciary duty to the owners of the securities that pass through its hands.
cited
Cited "see"
Bridget Brown Parson
See In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., 596 F.2d 1239, 1241 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 (1980). 59 Dkt.
cited
Cited "see"
Bridget Brown Parson
See In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., 596 F.2d 1239, 1241 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 (1980). 59 Dkt.
cited
Cited "see"
Think3 Litigation Trust v. Zuccarello (In re Think3, Inc.)
See BDRC Lofts, 2013 WL 395129 , at *4 (citing In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc., 596 F.2d 1239, 1247 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980)).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Shelbyville Mixing Center, Inc. (In Re Shelbyville Mixing Center, Inc.)
See In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc., 596 F.2d 1239, 1241 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rozsa v. May Davis Group, Inc.
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities, Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484 (2d Cir.1979) (“a clearing agent, is generally under no fiduciary duty to the owners of securities that pass through its hands”) (citation omitted), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Connolly v. Havens, 763 F.Supp. 6, 10 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (same); Dillon v. Militano, 731 F.Supp. 634, 636 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (same); Stander v. Financial Clearing & Services Corp., 730 F.Supp. 1282, 1286 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (same). 2 This holds true even where, as here, the clearing broker holds an investor’s funds f…
cited
Cited "see"
In re Kraushaar
See In re Phelps, 226 Kan. 371, 381 , 598 P. 2d 180 cert. denied 444 U.S. 1045 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
A.B. Real Estate, Inc. v. Bruno's, Inc. (In Re Bruno's, Inc.)
See In re Oceanquest Feeder Serv., Inc., 56 B.R. 715, 718 (Bankr.D.Conn.1986) (citing Matter of Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc., 596 F.2d 1239, 1247 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980)). 40 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Blumeyer
See In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc., 596 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); See also In re Finley, Rumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson & Casey, 149 B.R. 365 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 1993)(“The ‘interest of justice’ is a broad and flexible standard which contemplates a consideration of whether transferring venue would promote the efficient administration of the bankruptcy estate, judicial economy, timeliness and fairness.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Torre v. Federated Mutual Insurance
See Sweeney v. Bd. of Trustees of Keene State College, 604 F.2d 106, 113 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980) (stating that "[p]roof of a general atmosphere of discrimination is not the equivalent of proof of discrimination against an individual, but evidence of such an atmosphere may be considered along with any other evidence hearing on motive....”). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Harry J. Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Halberstam, 705 F.2d at 484 .
cited
Cited "see"
Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Halberstam, 705 F.2d at 484 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Haggerty v. Comstock Gold Co., LP
See O’Brien, supra, 719 F.Supp. at 227-28 . “ ‘The securities laws were not enacted to protect sophisticated businessmen from their own errors of judgment.’ ” Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 486 (2d Cir.1979) (quoting Hirsch v. du Pont, 553 F.2d 750 , *116 763 (2d Cir.1977)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Connolly v. Havens
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484 (2d Cir.1979) (“a clearing agent ... is generally under no fiduciary duty to the owners of the securities that pass through its hands.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Dillon v. Militano, 731 F.Supp. 634, 636 (S.D.N.Y.1990); Stander v. Financial Clearing & Services Corp., 730 F.Supp. 1282, 1286 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (Leisure, J.); Ross v. Bolton, 639 F.Supp. 323, 326-27 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Frame
See In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc., 596 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Griffin v. McNiff
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbara Jackson v. Harvard University
See Sweeney v. Bd. of Trustees of Keene State College, 604 F.2d 106, 112 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); see also Keyes, 853 F.2d at 1026 (even if plaintiffs qualifications were superior to those of successful male, that would not prove her case; an employer's mere ”[e]rrors in judgment are not the stuff of Title VII transgressions”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sandra Conway v. Electro Switch Corp., Sandra Conway v. Electro Switch Corp.
See Sweeney v. Trustees of Keene State College, 604 F.2d 106, 113 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); cf. Lamphere v. Brown University, 685 F.2d 743, 749-50 (1982) (upholding the admission of statistical evidence of a general discriminatory atmosphere at a place of employment as relevant to a claim that the employer discriminated against the individual plaintiff).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Oceanquest Feeder Service, Inc.
See Matter of Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc., 596 F.2d 1239, 1247 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Chang v. University of Rhode Island
See Sweeney v. Board of Trustees, 604 F.2d 106, 112 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Index Fund, Inc. v. Hagopian
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484 (2d Cir.1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Patricia Lynch v. Michael S. Dukakis
See Sweeney v. Board of Trustees, 604 F.2d 106 , 109 n. 2 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Jane Fortin, Etc. v. Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Welfare
See Sweeney v. Board of Trustees, 604 F.2d 106 , 109 n. 2 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frankel v. Wyllie & Thornhill, Inc.
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Monsen v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co., Inc., 579 F.2d 793 (3rd Cir. 1978); Woodward v. Metro Bank of Dallas, 522 F.2d 84 (5th Cir. 1975); cf. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 876.
discussed
Cited "see"
Morgan v. Prudential Group, Inc.
See Edwards & Hanley v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 [ 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 ] (1980).” Oleck v. Fischer, 623 F.2d 791, 794 (2d Cir. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
McAloon v. Bryant College of Business Administration
See Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Keene State College, 569 F.2d 169 (1st Cir.), vacated and remanded, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978), appeal on remand, 604 F.2d 106 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Lamphere v. Brown University, 553 F.2d 714 (1st Cir. 1977); Lamphere v. Brown University, 491 F.Supp. 232 (D.R.I.1980); Huang v. College of the Holy Cross, 436 F.Supp. 639 (D.Mass.1977); Banerjee v. Board of Trustees of Smith College, 495 F.Supp. 1148 (D.Mass.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Savino v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 483 (2d Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980) (no liability as principal where defendant did not participate in allegedly fraudulent sales).
cited
Cited "see"
Merrit v. Libby, McNeill & Libby
See Edwards & Hanley v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Smith v. University of North Carolina
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Keene State College, 604 F.2d 106, 109 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Stewart v. General Motors Corp., 542 F.2d 445, 449 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2995 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1105 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1980
(2×)
See Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Keene State College, 604 F.2d 106, 109 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Stewart v. General Motors Corp., 542 F.2d 445, 449 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2995 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1105 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oleck v. Fischer
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484-85 (2 Cir. 1979) cert. den., 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980), citing Woodward v. Metro Bank, 522 F.2d 84, 97 (5 Cir. 1975). 33 Judge Haight concluded that recklessness would satisfy the scienter requirement in this case by reason of the foreseeability to the accountant that the certification would be relied on by third parties.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oleck v. Fischer
See Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484-85 (2 Cir. 1979) cert. den., 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980), citing Woodward v. Metro Bank, 522 F.2d 84, 97 (5 Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp.
See generally Edwards & Hanley v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Jordan
See, e.g., In re Commonwealth Oil Refining, 596 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); In re Legend Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Condor Exploration, LLC
(The most important consideration in determining whether the transfer of venue is appropriate is whether the transfer would promote the economic and efficient administration of the estate); see also, Matter of Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc., 596 F.2d 1239, 1247 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Matter of Windtech, 73 B.R. 448, 451 (Bkrtcy.D.Conn.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Adler Coleman Clearing Corp.
See, e.g., Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities, Inc., 602 F.2d 478, 484 (2d Cir.1979) (“a clearing agent, is generally under no fiduciary duty to the owners of securities that pass through its hands”) (citing Woodward v. Metro Bank of Dallas, 522 F.2d 84 , 97 n. 29 (5th Cir.1975)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Connolly v. Havens, 763 F.Supp. 6, 10 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (same); Dillon v. Militano, 731 F.Supp. 634, 636 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) (same); Stander v. Financial Clearing & Services Corp., 730 F.Supp. 1282, 1286 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Standard Tank Cleaning Corp.
Compare Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc. (In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc.), 596 F.2d 1239, 1246 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980) (corporation’s principal place of business in offices where the Debt- or makes its major business decisions), with Dock of the Bay, 24 B.R. at 815 (venue improper where Debtor had no business address or telephone number in district); In re Maidman, 2 B.R. 569 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1980), aff 'd in an unreported decision of the District Court (Motley, D.J.), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pedro R. Victoria-Peguero, United States of America v. Fernando W. Anglada Alvarez
See id.; see also Sweeney v. Board of Trustees, 604 F.2d 106 , 109 n. 2 (1st Cir.1979) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); cf., e.g., Figueroa, 818 F.2d at 1024 (applying clearly erroneous standard to district court’s determination of probable cause).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mark H. SABREE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS LOCAL NO. 33, Defendants, Appellees
For example, in Furnco, the Court discussed whether the defendant’s actions were “discriminatorily motivated” and what factors a court should consider in determining “motivation.” Id. at 580 , 98 S.Ct. at 2951 ; see also Sweeney v. Board of Trustees, 604 F.2d 106, 112-13 (1st Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re FRG, Inc.
See, e.g., Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc. (In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc.), 596 F.2d 1239, 1247 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Bell Tower, 86 B.R. at 800 . 5 It being given that Greenbriar has no presence in this district, venue is lacking under § 1408(1).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Toxic Control Technologies, Inc.
Compare, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., (In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc.), 596 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir.1979) ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980) (interpreting former section 28 U.S.C. § 1475 which phrased “in the interest of justice and convenience of the parties in the conjunctive.”) (Emphasis ours).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mishkin v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, Ltd., 681 F.2d 111, 121 (2d Cir.1982); see also Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 485 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frieda MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NATIONAL BANK and Ronald Friedman, Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
See, e.g., Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978), on remand, Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Keene State College, 604 F.2d 106 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 733 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980); Davis v. Weidner, 596 F.2d 726 (7th Cir.1979); Wright v. National Archives and Records Service, 609 F.2d 702, 713-15 (4th Cir.1979); Satz v. ITT Financial Corp., 619 F.2d 738 , 745 n. 13 (8th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, Limited
See, e.g., Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484-85 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wander v. Steinhardt Partners (In re Sheridan Associates)
See, e.g., In re Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., 596 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 732 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980) (movant’s burden of proof is that of a preponderance of evidence); Bodine’s, Inc. v. Sunny-O, Inc., 494 F.Supp. 1279, 1285 (N.D.Ill.1980) (movant must show that the considerations of section 1404(a) weigh heavily in favor of the transferee court); In re Hartfield-Zodys, Inc., 5 Collier Bankruptcy Cases 699, 702 (S.D.N.Y.1975) (transfer is to be freely given so as to offset the hardships to witnesses and parties that could be caused by the new na…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,209 Arthur L. Stokes v. Lawrence Lokken and Henson & Tully, a Partnership
See also Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp., 602 F.2d 478, 484 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1045 , 100 S.Ct. 734 , 62 L.Ed.2d 731 (1980).
Philadelphia Food Store Employers' Labor Council
v.
Retail Clerks International Association, Local 1349
v.
Retail Clerks International Association, Local 1349
No. 79-708.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.