green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Rahr v. Grant Thornton LLP
See Wachovia Bank & Trust Company, N.A. v. National Student Marketing Corporation, 650 F.2d 342, 348 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3098 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
THIRTY v. Carlson
See Badoni v. Higginson, 638 F.2d 172, 176 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3099 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1984
See Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. National Student Marketing Corp., 650 F.2d 342, 349 (D.C.Cir.1980) (equitable tolling doctrine "permits, with respect to fraud, the tolling of the limitations period until the plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered through the exercise of due diligence, the fraudulent activity"), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3098 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981); King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1155 (10th Cir.1981) (simultaneous activity to conceal a wrong, in course of on-going price-fixing conspiracy, establishes concealment as a mat…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hobson v. Wilson
See Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. National Student Marketing Corp., 650 F.2d 342, 349 (D.C.Cir.1980) (equitable tolling doctrine "permits, with respect to fraud, the tolling of the limitations period until the plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered through the exercise of due diligence, the fraudulent activity”), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3098 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981); King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1155 (10th Cir.1981) (simultaneous activity to conceal a wrong, in course of on-going price-fixing conspiracy, establishes concealment as a m…
cited
Cited "see"
Kimmel v. Peterson
See generally, Wachovia Bank and Trust Corp. v. National Student Marketing Co., 650 F.2d 342 , 351 and 351 n. 20 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3098 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crow v. Gullet
See Badoni v. Higginson, 638 F.2d 172, 176-80 (10th Cir.1980) (denied relief to members of the Navajo tribe challenging, on first amendment free exercise grounds, the governmental regulatory and development activities at the Rainbow Bridge National Monument and Glen Canyon Dam), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3099 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981); Sequoyah v. TVA, 620 F.2d 1159 , 1164-65 (6th Cir.) (rejected free exercise challenge by Cherokee Indians to the flooding of ceremonial grounds caused by the Tellico Dam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980); Northwest I…
cited
Cited "see"
Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope v. United States
See Badoni v. Higginson, 638 F.2d 172, 180 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3099 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca1 1982
See Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc., 338 U.S. 912, 919 , 70 S.Ct. 252, 255 , 94 L.Ed. 562 (1950) (opinion of Frankfurter, J., respecting denial of petition for writ of certiorari) ** This observation relates to the question whether in a retroactivity analysis, we should focus on the state of the law at the time the claim arose, Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. National Student Marketing Corp., 650 F.2d 342, 347 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3098 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981), or on the state of the law when the new decision comes out.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fleck v. Cablevision VII, Inc.
See, e.g., Wachovia Bank and Trust v. National Student Marketing Corp., 650 F.2d 342, 349 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. den., 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3098 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981); Cross v. Price Waterhouse & Co., Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley
See, e.g., Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. National Student Marketing Corp., 650 F.2d 342 , 350 n. 19 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3098 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981) (avoiding issue of private right of action under section 17(a) because plaintiffs’ “claims can be fully satisfied” under section 10(b); recognizing conflict in circuits on whether section 17(a) permits private actions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laura Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
Despite the recent trend towards curtailing the scope of implied rights of action, the Supreme Court has continually reaffirmed that "[t]he existence of this implied remedy is simply beyond peradventure." Huddleston, 459 U.S. at 380 , 103 S.Ct. 687 ; see also Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. National Student Marketing Corp., 650 F.2d 342, 351-53 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3098 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981) (private right of action under section 10(b) survives recent Supreme Court contractions of implied right of action doctrine). 25 Regarding the second stage of the inquiry, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
Despite the recent trend towards curtailing the scope of implied rights of action, the Supreme Court has continually reaffirmed that “[t]he existence of this implied remedy is simply beyond peradventure.” Huddleston, 459 U.S. at 380 , 103 S.Ct. 687 ; see also Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. National Student Marketing Corp., 650 F.2d 342, 351-53 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3098 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981) (private right of action under section 10(b) survives recent Supreme Court contractions of implied right of action doctrine).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. Block
See, e.g., Badoni v. Higginson, 638 F.2d 172, 176-77 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3099 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981), Barnett v. Rodgers, 410 F.2d 995, 1000 (D.C.Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1983
See, e.g., Badoni v. Higginson, 638 F.2d 172, 176-77 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 3099 , 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981), Barnett v. Rodgers, 410 F.2d 995, 1000 (D.C.Cir.1969).
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
v.
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N. A. White & Case v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N. A. and Joy v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N. A.
v.
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N. A. White & Case v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N. A. and Joy v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N. A.
No. 80-1684; No. 80-1691; No. 80-1802.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1981.
Certiorari.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.Reported below: 209 U. S. App. D. C. 9, 650 F. 2d 342.