Escobedo v. United States, 449 U.S. 1036 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Escobedo v. United States, 449 U.S. 1036 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
87 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith v. United States (ca10, 1996-04-30) · Strongest negative: United States v. Fernandez-Morris (flsd, 1999-07-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Fernandez-Morris
S.D. Fla. · 1999 · signal: but see · confidence high
In re Burt, 737 F.2d 1477, 1487 (7th Cir.1984) (district court correct to address the merits of petitioner’s due process claims as a part of its habeas corpus review); see also Rosado v. Civiletti, 621 F.2d at 1197-98 (petitioner cannot be denied all access to a federal court where foreign conviction was obtained without the benefit of any due process whatsoever); Gallina v. Fraser, *1371 278 F.2d 77, 79 (2d Cir.1960) (closer scrutiny may be required where petitioner demonstrates that extradition would expose him to procedures or punishments that are antipathetic to the federal court’s sen…
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. United States
10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098 , 1106-07 & 1107 n. 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 , 101 S.Ct. 612 , 66 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980) and 450 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 1371 , 67 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
cited Cited "see" MALDONADO-CRUZ
BIA · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098, 1104 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 (1980); Karadzole v. Artukovic, 247 F.2d 198 (9th Cir. 1957).
cited Cited "see" Wise v. United States
D.C. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Corley v. United States, 416 A.2d 713 (D.C.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 , 101 S.Ct. 614 , 66 L.Ed.2d 499 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of California (2×)
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 , 101 S.Ct. 612 , 66 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Moyer Reed Plaster v. United States
4th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098, 1105 (5 Cir.) (citing cases), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 , 101 S.Ct. 612 , 66 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980); Peroff v. Hylton, 542 F.2d 1247, 1249 (4 Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Polo v. Horgan
S.D. Fla. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Review is limited to determining “whether the magistrate had jurisdiction, whether the offense charged is within the treaty and, by a somewhat liberal extension, whether there was any evidence warranting the finding that there was reasonable ground to believe the accused guilty.” Fernandez v. Phillips, 268 U.S. 311, 312 [ 45 S.Ct. 541, 542 , 69 L.Ed. 970 ] (1925) (Holmes, J.); see also Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098, 1101 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 [ 101 S.Ct. 612 , 66 L.Ed.2d 497 ] (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thomas James Martin v. Warden, Atlanta Pen, U.S. Marshall Service (2×)
11th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Review is limited to determining “whether the magistrate had jurisdiction, whether the offense charged is within the treaty and, by a somewhat liberal extension, whether there was any evidence warranting the finding that there was reasonable ground to believe the accused guilty.” Fernandez v. Phillips, 268 U.S. 311, 312 , 45 S.Ct. 541, 542 , 69 L.Ed. 970 (1925) (Holmes, J.); see also Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098, 1101 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 , 101 S.Ct. 612 , 66 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980). 7 Extradition ultimately remains an Executive function.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Martinez
N.D. Ga. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id.; see also Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098, 1105 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 , *1037 101 S.Ct. 612 , 66 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Josey v. Galloway
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 , 101 S.Ct. 612 , 66 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980), holding that hearsay evidence which recited the evidentiary facts upon which the affiant based the conclusion that the accused was present in the state when the offense was committed, is admissible in extradition proceedings.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ernest Henry Wiebe
8th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098, 1102 (5th Cir.) (sole evidence introduced at extradition hearing to prove probable cause consisted of Mexican extradition documents), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 , 101 S.Ct. 612 , 66 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980). 18 U.S.C. § 3190 provides that the extradition documents, properly authenticated and certified, are admissible evidence “for all the purposes of such [extradition] hearing.” Similarly, article X of the Extradition Treaty provides that the arrest warrant and the documents accompanying the request for extradition are admissible evidence.
Escobedo
v.
United States
No. 80-751.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1980.
449 U.S. 1036
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.