green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orville Milk
See United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 742 (8th Cir. 1981) (holding that the district court did not err in refusing to give a lesser included instruction for simple possession when the defendant was convicted of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and possession with the intent to distribute), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orville Milk
See United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 742 (8th Cir.1981) (holding that the district court did not err in refusing to give a lesser included instruction for simple possession when the defendant was convicted of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and possession with the intent to distribute), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gutierrez-Santiman
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258-59 (2d Cir.1981) (affidavit sufficient that disclosed use of standard investigative techniques and paucity of evidence which had resulted or could be expected to result), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 886-87 (9th Cir.) (“An investigative agency is not required to exhaust all possible investigative techniques before resorting to a wiretap.”), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 259 (2nd Cir.1981) (district court’s finding of fact that a date on the order authorizing the wiretap was a ministerial error and therefore insignificant was not a clearly erroneous finding), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 907, 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 1251, 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); United States v. Acon, 513 F.2d 513, 518 (3rd Cir.1975) (“Suppression is not required for facial insufficiency relating to less critical requirements which may be varied by subsequent affidavits.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie Gordon Harris
See United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 740 (8th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alexander
United States v. White, 750 F.2d 726, 728-29 (8th Cir.1984); see United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 738 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ruscingno
See U.S. v. Collins, 652 F. 2d 735, 740 (8th Cir.1981), cert. den. 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed. 2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William C. Page
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258-59 (2d Cir.1981) (affidavit sufficient that disclosed use of standard investigative techniques and paucity of evidence which had resulted or could be expected to result), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 886-87 (9th Cir.) (“An investigative agency is not required to exhaust all possible investigative techniques before resorting to a wiretap.”), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Fox
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 260 (2d Cir. 1981) (discretion to grant or deny continuance), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); see also United States v. Correia, 531 F.2d 1095, 1098 (1st Cir.1976) (noting that Act puts “significant pressure” on district court to exercise discretion to control its own docket); cf. 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(8)(A) to (C) (“ends of justice” continuance).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul O'Malley
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 259 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 1251, 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); United States v. Bailey, 607 F.2d 237, 241 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 934 , 100 S.Ct. 1327 , 63 L.Ed.2d 769 (1980); United States v. Santora, 600 F.2d 1317, 1319-20 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1054 (5th Cir.1976); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. Lonardo
See United States v. Todisio, 667 F.2d 255, 260 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982), and United States v. Horton, 676 F.2d 1165, 1170 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983); see also Committee on the Administration of the Criminal Law of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Guidelines to the Administration of the Speedy Trial Act oif 1979 (1981) at 14 (30-day period does not run anew when a superseding indictment is filed).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Ruggiero, Nicholas Santora, Anthony Rabito, and Antonio Tomasulo
Viewing the affidavits submitted in support of the wiretap applications in a " 'common sense and realistic fashion' ", United States v. Ivic, 700 F.2d 51, 57 (2d Cir.1983); see United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976), and with the deference properly accorded to the issuing judge, United States v. Perry, 643 F.2d 38, 50 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 835 , 102 S.Ct. 138 , 70 L.Ed.2d 115 (1981); see United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 7…
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Moran
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 261 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCabe v. Comm'r
Accordingly, they are taxable on the 1979 refund only to the extent of $64.95, the difference between the amount that they deducted and for which they received a tax benefit ($708.82) and the amount of tax that they actually owed and paid ($643.87). 3 Sec. 111(b); sec. 1.111-1(a)(2), Income Tax Regs. ; see Hillsboro National Bank v. Commissioner, 455 U.S. 906 (1983) . (c) Compensation for Services During 1979, Mr. McCabe performed services for Parsont Reporting Service and received taxable compensation in the amount of $1,179.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shakur
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur Lee Burns, Jr.
In addition, we have held that where the accused initially waives his or her right to remain silent and agrees to questioning, but “subsequently refuses to answer further questions, the prosecution may note the refusal because it now constitutes part of an otherwise admissible conversation between the police and the accused.” United States v. Harris, 956 F.2d 177, 181 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 827 , 113 S.Ct. 85 , 121 L.Ed.2d 48 (1992); see also United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 739 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur Lee Burns Jr.
In addition, we have held that where the accused initially waives his or her right to remain silent and agrees to questioning, but "subsequently refuses to answer further questions, the prosecution may note the refusal because it now constitutes part of an otherwise admissible conversation between the police and the accused." United States v. Harris, 956 F.2d 177, 181 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 827 (1992); see also United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 739 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mellan
Dongilli Aff. ¶¶ 40-48; see also United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom., Vallone v. United States, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) (pen register and other contacts “subject to an innocent interpretation when viewed in isolation” support probable cause finding when set in context).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Millan
Dongilli Aff. ¶¶ 40-48; see also United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom., Vallone v. United States, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) (pen register and other contacts "subject to an innocent interpretation when viewed in isolation" support probable cause finding when set in context).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kirkland
See also, United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 259 (2nd Cir.1981) (district court’s finding of fact that a date on the order authorizing the wiretap was a ministerial error and therefore insignificant was not a clearly erroneous finding), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 1251, 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Feola
See, e.g., United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) (pen register and other contacts “subject to an innocent interpretation when viewed in isolation” supported probable cause finding when set in context).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Word v. United States
See also United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 260 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth Fitzgerald v. United States
See also United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
Central Intelligence Agency
v.
Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity
v.
Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity
No. 81-1098 (A-330).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1982.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of respondent to modify the order entered by The Chief Justice on November 17, 1981, is granted, and the order is vacated insofar as it relates to the “35 congressionally generated documents.” In all other respects, the order of The Chief Justice entered November 17, 1981, is continued pending this Court’s final disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari.