green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“A subsequent failure to achieve monopoly status cannot itself vitiate a claim of attempted monopoly where other evidence substantially supports the attempt without eviscerating the entire attempt offense.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“It is now well established that any rule of reason analysis requires a showing of anti-competitive market effect. To hold otherwise would ignore the very purpose of the antitrust laws which were enacted for the protection of competition, not competitors.”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.
a subsequent failure to achieve monopoly status cannot itself vitiate a claim of attempted monopoly where other evidence substantially supports the attempt without eviscerating the entire attempt offense.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
it is now well established that any rule of reason analysis requires a showing of anti-competitive market effect. to hold otherwise would ignore the very purpose of the antitrust laws which were enacted for the protection of competition, not competitors.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
White and White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.
umerous courts have found a market share of 30 or higher to be insufficient, by itself, to prove a dangerous probability of monopolization (citing cases)
discussed
Cited "see"
Lemus v. Timberland Apartments, L.L.C.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir.2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc); accord McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reames v. AB Car Rental Services, Inc.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir.2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc); accord McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Advanced Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Giles Memorial Hospital
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 270-71 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
TechniCAL, Inc. v. Allpax Products, Inc.
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 265 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. *587 921, 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Muenster Butane, Inc., 651 F.2d at 295 . 13 The court notes that the rule of reason approach requires the plaintiff to show some adverse affect on competition.
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker's Aid, a Division of M. Raubvogel Co. v. Hussmann Foodservice Co.
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 267 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Alders v. AFA Corp. of Florida, 353 F.Supp. 654, 658 (S.D.Fla.1973), aff'd without opinion, 490 F.2d 990 (5th Cir.1974).
examined
Cited "see"
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
(3×)
See Lektro-Vend Corporation v. Vendo Company, 660 F.2d 255 , 269-70 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982). *1473 (1) Elements of Claims 58.
cited
Cited "see"
Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William Engle
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 262-63 (7th Cir.1981) (review of mixed, findings and “paper” cases), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Becker v. Egypt News Company, Inc.
See Auburn News Co. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 278 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Hardin v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 434 F.Supp. 54, 56 (S.D.Tex.1977); Lamarca v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 395 F.Supp. 324, 327 (S.D.Fla.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Multiflex, Inc. v. Samuel Moore & Company, and Eaton Corporation
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 270 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) and cases cited.
cited
Cited "see"
Laurence J. Gordon, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 271-72 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez Quinonez v. Puerto Rico National Guard
Inc. v. SprintCom, Inc., 287 F.3d 1, 9 (1st Cir.2002); see also Auburn News Co. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 277 (1st Cir.1981) (“[T]he probability-of-suecess component has loomed large in cases before this court”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); LeBeau v. Spirito, 703 F.2d 639, 645 (1st Cir.1983) (affirming denial of preliminary injunction and ending inquiry after concluding that plaintiffs were unlikely to prevail on the merits).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Augusta News Co. v. News America Publishing, Inc.
See also Auburn News Co., Inc. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 277 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reardon v. United States
See also Auburn News Co., Inc. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 277 (1st Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Football League v. National Football League
(2×)
See, e.g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1082 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indiana Federation of Dentists, an Unincorporated Association v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255 , 265 n. 11 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Shell Oil Co., 626 F.2d 549, 555 (7th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Advisory Information & Management Systems, Inc. v. Prime Computer, Inc.
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Corp., 660 F.2d 255 , 271 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) (and citations); United States v. Empire Gas Corp., 537 F.2d 296, 305-07 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1122 , 97 S.Ct. 1158 , 51 L.Ed.2d 572 (1977); Terry’s Floor Fashions v. Burlington Industries, 568 F.Supp. 205, 214 (E.D.N.C.1983). 7 Prime’s maximum market share of 25 percent in 1983 had stabilized from the year before.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 274 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association For Intercollegiate Athletics For Women v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 273 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) ("[An] intent to triumph in the competitive market, in the absence of unfair, anticompetitive or predatory conduct, is not enough to establish an antitrust violation." (quoting Hayes v. Solomon, 597 F.2d 958, 977 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1078 , 100 S.Ct. 1028 , 62 L.Ed.2d 761 (1980)) 12 AIAW argues that the district court, even in the absence of direct evidence of specific intent, should have inferred this intent for attempted monopolizati…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association for Intercollegiate Athletics for Women v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 273 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) ("[An] intent to triumph in the competitive market, in the absence of unfair, anticompetitive or predatory conduct, is not enough to establish an antitrust violation.” (quoting Hayes v. Solomon, 597 F.2d 958, 977 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1078 , 100 S.Ct. 1028 , 62 L.Ed.2d 761 (1980)). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1984
See Kaplan, 611 F.2d at 291 ; see also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 268-269 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League
See Kaplan, 611 F.2d at 291 ; see also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 268-269 (7th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R. Anthony Marrese and Michael R. Treister v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
(2×)
See, e.g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 274 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Hayes v. Solomon, 597 F.2d 958, 984 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1078 , 100 S.Ct. 1028 , 62 L.Ed.2d 761 (1980); Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District of Peoria, 583 F.2d 378, 379 (7th Cir.1978) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1090 , 99 S.Ct. 873 , 59 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979); Abramson v. Pennwood Investment Corp., 392 F.2d 759, 762 (2d Cir.1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Organization of Minority Vendors, Inc. v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 268 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 264-65 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) (noncompetition covenants ancillary to sale of business); Bradford v. New York Times Co., 501 F.2d at 59-60 (post-employment noncompetition agreement). 15 Without citing any authority, Aydin asserts that because most covenants ancillary to a valid agreement are tested by the rule of reason, all non-ancillary restraints must be tested under a per se standard.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Football League v. North American Soccer League
See, e.g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendor Co., 660 F.2d 255 (CA7 1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gweldon Lee Paschall and All Intervenors v. The Kansas City Star Company
(2×)
See also Auburn News Co. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 278 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
Richard CHARLTON
v.
CORTEZ DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
v.
CORTEZ DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
No. 81-997.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1982.
102 S. Ct. 1277
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Denied.