green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Kroger Co.
See Terrell v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co., 644 F.2d 1112, 1123 (5th Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2229 , 72 L.Ed.2d 841 (1982); Sanchez, 431 F.2d at 466 ; Hebert v. Monsanto Co., 1981 WL 313 , at *3 (S.D.Tex.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sun Na Lee
See City of Parma, Ohio v. Record Revolution No. 6, Inc., 451 U.S. 1013 (1981), and City of Parma, Ohio v. Record Revolution No. 6, Inc., 456 U.S. 968 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. 57,261 Items of Drug Paraphernalia, Etc., (88-5320), Contempo Products, Inc., by and Through Its President Richard K. Rowland (88- 5320), Claimant-Appellant. Contempo Products, Inc. v. Ralph Whiteside and Bill Crane (87-6018)
See 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2227 , 72 L.Ed.2d 840 (1982), on remand, 709 F.2d 534 (6th Cir.1983). 11 The Hoffman case is squarely on point.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Christensen
See Gaffey, 50 Or.App. at 632 , 624 P.2d at 625 (citing Record Revolution No. 6, Inc. v. City of Parma, 638 F.2d 916 (6th Cir.1980), vacated by 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2227 , 72 L.Ed.2d 840 (1982), ordinance upheld on appeal after remand, 709 F.2d 534 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. 57,261 Items of Drug Paraphernalia
See 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2227 , 72 L.Ed.2d 840 (1982), on remand, 709 F.2d 534 (6th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(2×)
See Rivers v. Rosenthal & Co., 634 F.2d 774 , 778 n. 7 (5th Cir.1980) (summarizing holdings), vacated and remanded, 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2228 , 72 L.Ed.2d 841 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
William T. Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. Sandor, Mortgage Services of America v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. Sandor
(2×)
See Rivers v. Rosenthal & Co., 634 F.2d 774 , 778 n. 7 (5th Cir.1980) (summarizing holdings), vacated and remanded, 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2228 , 72 L.Ed.2d 841 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Philman's, Inc. v. City of West Carrollton
See Record Revolution No. 6, Inc. v. City of Parma, 638 F.2d 916, 925 (6th Cir.1980), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 451 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 2998 , 69 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981), 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2227 , 72 L.Ed.2d 840 (1982), on later appeal, 709 F.2d 534 (6th Cir.1983); Wright, Miller & Cooper, § 4242 at 461-63.
cited
Cited "see"
Nova Records, Inc. v. Sendak
See 451 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 2998 , 68 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981) and 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2227 , 72 L.Ed.2d 840 (1982) 5 Antioch and Record Head were decided by the same panel on the same day.
cited
Cited "see"
Nova Records, Inc. v. Sendak
See 451 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 2998 , 68 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981) and 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2227 , 72 L.Ed.2d 840 (1982). .
cited
Cited "see"
Camille Corporation, an Illinois Corporation v. William Phares
See 451 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 2998 , 68 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981) and, 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2227 , 72 L.Ed.2d 840 (1982). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Ass'n of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. v. City of Worcester
See also Record Revolution No. 6, Inc. v. City of Parma, 638 F.2d 916, 937 (6th Cir.1980), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2227 , 72 L.Ed.2d 840 (1982) (“The cities’ interest in regulation of advertising is limited to preventing the sale of drug paraphernalia inside their municipal boundaries.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Samuel Eubanks, M.D. v. Wallace Wilkinson
See also Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co., 486 U.S. 750, 770 , 108 S.Ct. 2138, 2150-51 , 100 L.Ed.2d 771 (1988) (Court declined to presume that Mayor would "adhere to standards absent from the statute's face," and declared that "the limits the city claims are implicit in its law [must] be made explicit by textual incorporation, binding judicial or administrative construction, or well-established practice" and asserting that "[t]his court will not write nonbinding limits into a silent state statute"). 42 This Circuit has adhered to the principle that a federal court "has very limited pow…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Khalid Bin Alwaleed Foundation v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
(2×)
Compare Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 , 133 n. 7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979) (investor may maintain an action against his broker for violations of anti-fraud provisions of the CEA) (dictum) with Rivers v. Rosenthal & Co., 634 F.2d 774 (5th Cir.1980), vacated, 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2228 , 72 L.Ed.2d 841 (1982) (no private right of action available).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Protect Our Mountain Environment, Inc. v. District Court in & for the County of Jefferson
(2×)
See, e.g., Board of County Commissioners v. Howard, 640 P.2d 1128 (Colo.1982), appeal dismissed, 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2228 , 72 L.Ed.2d 841 (1982); People v. Dunlap, 623 P.2d 408 (Colo.1981). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Howard
v.
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, Colorado
v.
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, Colorado
No. 81-1752.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1982.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Colo, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.