green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
12.3 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"this Court does not sit as an administrative agency for the purpose of fact-finding in the first instance"
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Cardoen
government agents or informers are not true conspirators.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ca7 1992
this court does not sit as an administrative agency for the purpose of fact-finding in the first instance
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rhoa-Zamora v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
this court does not sit as an administrative agency for the purpose of fact-finding in the first instance
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jonathan Garrett and Christopher Garrett
defendant ... must demonstrate compelling prejudice 1015 against which the trial court will be unable to afford protection
cited
Cited "see"
Rodimir Elias v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerard Kurpet v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 725 (9th Cir.1980) (noting that " '[v]iolation of a regulation renders a deportation unlawful only if the violation prejudiced the interests of the alien which were protected by the regulation.' ") (quoting United States v. Calderon-Medina, 591 F.2d 529, 531 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darden
See United States v. Wilson, 665 F.2d 825, 830 (8th Cir.1981) (construing 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 1111 (1976)), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rolando Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Tejeda-Mata v. I.N.S., 626 F.2d 721, 727 (9th Cir. 1980) ("[I]f a petitioner wishes to preserve an issue for appeal, he must first raise it in the proper administrative forum."), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982) 2 See next section for a more detailed discussion of Rodriguez's behavior during the hearing
cited
Cited "see"
Hossein Hamzavi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Vargas v. INS, 831 F.2d 906, 907 (9th Cir. 1987); accord Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herminigilda Malaluan Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 724 (9th Cir.1980) (authenticity of I-213 established by officer's identification of form as one prepared by him), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982). 16 Lopez's sole contention with regard to the I-213's authenticity is that the INS failed to show that she provided the information on the form.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Manuel Leon-Leon
(2×)
See Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration & Naturalization Svc., 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982) (this court has repeatedly recognized the importance of an interpreter to the fundamental fairness of a deportation hearing; it was improper for the Immigration Judge to deny simultaneous translation when the interpreter was present at the hearing). 34 Under these circumstances, the appellant's due process rights were violated.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oscar Padilla-Agustin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 725 (9th Cir.1980) (stating that a “[violation of a regulation renders a deportation unlawful only if [it] prejudiced the interests of the alien”) (internal quotation omitted), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maryam Hartooni v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 626 F.2d 721 (9th Cir.1980) (“this court and others have repeatedly recognized the importance of an interpreter to the fundamental fairness of ... [a deportation] hearing if the alien cannot speak English fluently”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Mentor v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 626 F.2d 721 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Weather Shield Mfg., Inc., Millwork Division v. National Labor Relations Board
(3×)
See Kopack v. N.L.R.B., 668 F.2d 946, 953-955 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2278 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1290 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Weather Shield Mfg., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
(3×)
See Kopack v. N.L.R.B., 668 F.2d 946, 953-55 (7th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2278 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1290 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Vasquez, A/K/A Ricardo Guzman
See United States v. Tombrello, 666 F.2d 485 , *1517 490 n. 3 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Tso v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Id. at 907 , citing Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
TOMAS
See Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir. 1980) (dictum), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982); Niarchos v. INS, 393 F.2d 509 (7th Cir. 1968) (dictum); Gonzales v. Zurbrick, 45 F.2d 934 (6th Cir. 1930).
discussed
Cited "see"
Amalio Calderon-Ontiveros v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 724 (9th Cir.1980) (upholding the admission, over a hearsay objection, of an INS apprehension report such as was admitted in Calderon-Ontiveros’ case), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gary
See United States v. Tombrello, 666 F. 2d 485 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 73 L.Ed. 2d 1291 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 (1982); State v. Conrad, 275 N.C. 342 , 168 S.E. 2d 39 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Annie Martinez, A/K/A Annie Griego, and Gloria Dominguez-Williams
See United States v. Gonzalez, 671 F.2d 441 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom., Gonzalez-Hernandez v. United States, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Eleuterio Valadez-Salas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Ireneo Ysip Israel, Josefina Torres Israel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Cutting, Inc.
(3×)
Sioux Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 684 F.2d 1251, 1253 (7th Cir.1982); NLRB v. Berger Transfer & Storage Co., 678 F.2d 679 , 687 (7th Cir.1982); see Kopack v. NLRB, 668 F.2d 946, 953-54 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2278 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1290 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez-Collazo
The very essence of due process is a ‘meaningful opportunity to be heard.’ ”); see also Tejeda-Mata v. I.N.S, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
PONCE-HERNANDEZ
Matter of Mejia, 16 I&N Dec. 6 (BIA 1976); Matter of Davila, 15 I&N Dec. 781 (BIA 1976), remanded, Davila-Villacaba v. INS, 594 F.2d 242 (9th Cir. 1979); see also Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982).” Matter of Barcenas, supra, at 611.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Helmick
Berger, 4 Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 801(d)(2)(e), p. 176 (1981); See also United States v. Tombrello, 666 F.2d 485, 490 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982) (“... co-conspirators’ hearsay statements made after the termination of the conspiracy are not admissible])]”); State v. Willis, 559 N.W.2d 693 (Minn.1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marincas v. Lewis
(2×)
The very essence of due process is a ‘meaningful opportunity to be heard.’ ”); see also Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982); Niarchos v. INS, 393 F.2d 509, 511 (7th Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marincas v. Lewis
The very essence of due process is a 'meaningful opportunity to be heard.' "); see also Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982); Niarchos v. INS, 393 F.2d 509, 511 (7th Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manuel Magallon-Cervantes v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
II Analysis 6 As the BIA stated in its decision, "it is well established that the indictment is considered to be part of the record of conviction." See Matter of Mena, 17 I & N Dec. 38 at 39 (BIA 1979); Matter of Esfandiary, 16 I & N Dec. 659 at 661 (BIA 1979); see also Tejada-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 724 (9th Cir.1980) (evidence in deportation hearing is admissible if it is probative and fundamentally fair), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herbert Edmundo Gomez-Vigil and Silvia Auxiladora Hernandez De Gomez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) (With a stated exception not applicable here, “the petition shall be determined solely on the administrative record upon which the deportation order is based”); see also Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1980) (“[I]t is an established principle that this court does not sit as an administrative agency for the purpose of fact-finding in the first instance ... ”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2280 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Becerra
See also United States v. Gonzalez, 671 F.2d 441, 443-44 (11th Cir.) (construing the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (c)(1)), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982); accord, United States v. Manfredi, 722 F.2d 519 (9th Cir. 1983). 2 Furthermore, by not objecting on August 13 when the trial was recessed until August 15, defense counsel waived any speedy trial objection.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kington
See also United States v. Gonzales, 671 F.2d 441, 443-44 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982); United States v. Scaife, 749 F.2d 338, 343 (6th Cir.1984). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert M. Burton, Peter Balogun
See also United States v. Tombrello, 666 F.2d 485, 490 (11th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Morriss v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Tombrello, 666 F.2d 485 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony Charles Durham v. United States
See e.g., United States v. Tombrello, 666 F.2d 485 , cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (11th Cir.1982) (holding that illegal conspiracy is complete regardless of whether the crime agreed upon is actually consumated, and that the defendant could be convicted of conspiracy even though he is acquitted of the substantive offense).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 1987
(2×)
United States v. Jones, 545 F.2d 1112, 1115 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1075 , 97 S.Ct. 814 , 50 L.Ed.2d 793 (1977) (holding the evidence insufficient to convict defendant of conspiracy to distribute heroin, this court observed, "Surmise cannot be permitted in a criminal case"); see also United States v. Wilson, 665 F.2d 825, 830 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982). 21 As we noted in United States v. Knife, 592 F.2d 472 (8th Cir.1979), "[w]e are well aware that the standard to be applied by an appellate court in determining sufficienc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Grey Bear
(2×)
United States v. Jones, 545 F.2d 1112, 1115 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1075 , 97 S.Ct. 814 , 50 L.Ed.2d 793 (1977) (holding the evidence insufficient to convict defendant of conspiracy to distribute heroin, this court observed, “Surmise cannot be permitted in a criminal case”); see also United States v. Wilson, 665 F.2d 825, 830 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Giovanni Lignarolo and Mario Lignarolo
Evidence of an overt act committed by one of the conspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy is also required. 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1982); see also United States v. Tombrello, 666 F.2d 485, 490 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Lawrence Pollock
See also, United States v. Gonzalez, 671 F.2d 441, 443 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982) (to count 70-day limit from indictment to trial, add 70 days to date of indictment). 7 . 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(1)-(7) (1976 & Supp.
Tatum
v.
National Bank of Commerce, Lincoln, Nebraska
v.
National Bank of Commerce, Lincoln, Nebraska
No. 81-6544.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1982.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.