green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
12.1 score
“ejntrapment occurs when a defendant who was not predisposed to commit a crime does so as a result of the government's inducement.”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 44 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Castro, Victor. Appeal of Victor Castro. United States of America v. Suarez, Tomas. In No. 85-1132 United States of America v. Garcia-Remedio, Pablo. Appeal of Pablo Garcia-Remedio
ntrapment occurs when a defendant who was not predisposed to commit a crime does so as a result of the government's inducement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Castro
ejntrapment occurs when a defendant who was not predisposed to commit a crime does so as a result of the government's inducement.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph v. Government of the Virgin Islands
See Virgin Islands v. Isaac, 50 F.3d 1175, 1179 (3d Cir. 1995) (“The fact that the testimony is contradictory does not mean the evidence is insufficient, only that the jury must make credibility determinations.”) (citing United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 598 (3d Cir. 1995) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S. Ct. 2906 , 73 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Government of Virgin Islands v. Henry
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 598 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982) (holding that “[c]redibility determinations are for the jury”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. SDI Future Health, Inc.
See Rochin, supra, (police conduct in pumping defendant’s stomach to obtain incriminating evidence of illegal drug use.) The Third Circuit in Voigt , citing its earlier decision in United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 (3rd Cir.) (in banc) cert. denied 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982), noted that the judiciary is extremely hesitant to find law enforcement conduct so offensive that it violates the Due Process Clause.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stefan E. Brodie
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 581 (3d Cir.) (en banc) (trial court usurped jury function by deciding contested issues of fact), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); see also 2A Charles A. Wright, Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tony Clanton v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 592, 592-593 (3d Cir.1982), c/d 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Amato
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 592 (3d Cir.) (“The appropriate inquiry then is ... whether the defendants’ conduct constituted a sufficient threat to interstate commerce so as to implicate an ‘area of federal concern’ sufficient to give rise to federal jurisdiction.”), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); cf. United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671, 695 , 95 S.Ct. 1255 , 43 L.Ed.2d 541 (1975) (“Where ... there is an unfulfilled agreement to assault, it must be established whether the agreement, standing alone, constituted a sufficient th…
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Houston
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 597 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Samuel Isaac
(2×)
See United States v. Janotti, 673 F.2d 578, 598 (3d Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brenda Tucker and Barbara McDonald
(2×)
See United States v. Beverly, 723 F.2d 11, 12 (3d Cir.1983) ( citing United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 , 610 n. 17 (3d Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
CFT Seaside Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Hammet
See Mid-Carolina Oil, Inc. v. Klippel, 526 *842 F.Supp. 694, 696-97 (D.S.C.1981) (applying three year statute of limitations found in § 35-1-1530 to causes of actions pleading violations of § 10(b) and SEC Rule 10b-5), aff'd., 673 F.2d 1313 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
(2×)
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 608 (3d Cir.1982) (en banc) (the lines between objective entrapment and due process entrapment “are indeed hazy”), rev’g 501 F.Supp. 1182 (E.D.Pa.1980), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); Call for Reform, supra, 21 Rutgers L.J. at 435 n. 136 (due process entrapment is distinguishable from the objective theory of entrapment “only in degree”); see also United States v. Ramirez, 710 F.2d 535, 539 (9th Cir.1983) (due process defense is “a close relative of entrapment” but it is independent); cf Jeffrey N…
cited
Cited "see"
Block v. First Blood Associates
See Mid-Carolina Oil, Inc. v. Klippel, 526 F.Supp. 694, 695-97 (D.S.C.1981), aff'd mem., 673 F.2d 1313 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. LBS Bank-New York, Inc.
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 , 610 n. 17 (3rd Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982) (refusing to overrule Twigg but seemingly limiting it to its facts). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. R. Gordon Reeves, Doylin C. Kile, and Charles J. Kerlegon
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 601 (3rd Cir.1982) (It is not a defense to bribery that, had there been no bribe, the official might have made the very recommendation the briber wanted him to make.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Ferreri v. Mainardi
See Mid-Carolina Oil, Inc. v. Klippel, 526 F.Supp. 694, 696 (D.S.C.1981), aff 'd without op., 673 F.2d 1313 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mary Holmes
See United States v. Brooklier, 685 F.2d 1208, 1217 (9th Cir.1982) (in prosecution for Hobbs Act violations, court rejected argument that there was no basis for federal jurisdiction because FBI business establishment was a fiction), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 1194 , 75 L.Ed.2d 439 (1983); accord United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 592-94 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); see also United States v. Smith, 749 F.2d 1568, 1569 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 2680 , 86 L.Ed.2d 698 (1985) (whe…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gus Curcio, United States of America v. James Hawley
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 592 (3d Cir.1982) (some “threatened effect”), ce rt. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Rosa, 560 F.2d 149, 153 (3d Cir.) (jurisdiction for attempt exists when acts, if completed, would have some effect), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 862 , 98 S.Ct. 191 , 54 L.Ed.2d 135 (1977).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. J. Wilton Hunt, Sr.
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 604 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald Olgin, Marilyn Olgin, Jerome Shapiro, James F. O'brocta. Appeal of James F. O'BrOcta
(2×)
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 591 (3d Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John W. Jenrette
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 599 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Allen v. State of Alabama
Stephens v. Zant, 716 F.2d 276 (5th Cir.1983) (former Fifth Circuit case); see Cobb v. Wainwright, 666 F.2d 966 , 968 n. 1 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); Spivey v. Zant, 661 F.2d 464, 477 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1111 , 102 S.Ct. 3495 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1374 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Jannotti, Harry P. Schwartz, George X. Appeal of Harry P. Jannotti, in No. 83-1093. Appeal of George X. Schwartz, in No. 83-1094
(4×)
See 673 F.2d 578 , cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph R. Silvestri
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 602-03 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Kelly
See United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 596-98 (3d Cir.) (en banc) (summarizing Supreme Court precedent), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823, 835-36 (2d Cir.1982). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold F. Mayo, Jr. And Mark A. McGarghan
United States v. Sherman, 200 F.2d 880, 882-83 (2d Cir.1952); see United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 597 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack White v. South Park Independent School District
See Hillis v. Stephen F. Austin State University, 665 F.2d 547, 552 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982) (holding that appellate review in a first amendment case of a lower court’s finding concerning the motivation behind a decision to terminate a faculty member is governed by the clearly erroneous standard).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martorano
That kind of fact impossibility might preclude conviction on a possession charge, United States v. Heng Awkak Roman, 356 F.Supp. 434, 436 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 484 F.2d 1271 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 978 , 94 S.Ct. 1565 , 39 L.Ed.2d 874 (1974), or a distribution charge, United States v. Everett, 520 F.Supp. 46, 49-50 (E.D.Pa.1981); see generally, United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 591 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982) (impossibility a defense to an element of jurisdiction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rehak
See also United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 591 (3d Cir.) (en banc) (upholding Hobbs Act conspiracy convictions for receiving money to influence official conduct from undercover agents posing as foreign business executives seeking favorable government action), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Parker, 165 F.Supp.2d 431, 456 (W.D.N.Y.2001) (defendants convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 241 for conspiring to violate rights of a fictitious drug dealer, who was actually an undercover agent), aff'd sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Government of the Virgin Islands
Appx. 170, 174 (3d Cir. 2007); see also United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 598 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S. Ct. 2906 , 73 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Lynn Pitt, in No. 98-7383 United States of America v. William Michael Strube, Also Known as Mike Strube, in No. 98-7497
See also, United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Beverly, 723 F.2d 11 (3d Cir.1983); United States v. DeRewal, 10 F.3d 100 (3d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1033 , 114 S.Ct. 1544 , 128 L.Ed.2d 196 (1994) (all calling Twigg into doubt). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nolan-Cooper
See, e.g., United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982), 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 244, 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984); United States v. Voigt, 89 F.3d 1050, 1070 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 623 , 136 L.Ed.2d 546 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Jones, Dwayne Frederick and Alson Schmidt
See United States v. Curcio, 759 F.2d 237, 242 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848 , 106 S.Ct. 142 , 88 L.Ed.2d 117 (1985); see also United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 592 (3d Cir.) (en banc) (holding that convictions for conspiracy and attempt to violate the Hobbs Act have been sustained even without evidence of an actual effect on interstate commerce), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John A. Driscoll
See, e.g., United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 601 (3d Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Hill, 655 F.2d 512, 514 (3d Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferreri v. Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel
See, e.g., Mid-Carolina Oil, Inc. v. Klippel, 526 F.Supp. 694, 696 (D.S.C.1981), aff'd without op., 673 F.2d 1313 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pierre Michel Henri Giry and Steven Seward
Factual impossibility is no defense.” United States v. Senatore, 509 F.Supp. 1108, 1110 (E.D.Pa.1981) (statutory citations omitted); see also United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 591 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982), aff'd on later appeal, 729 F.2d 213 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984) (“Because an agreement between two or more persons to commit criminal acts poses, in and of itself, a serious danger to social order, it is proscribed by the law of conspiracy ...
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Katherine Bordallo Aguon
(2×)
See e.g., United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 594-96 (3d Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Butler, 618 F.2d 411, 417-20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 927 , 100 S.Ct. 3024 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1121 (1980); United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313, 320-21 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976); United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 393 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 , 151 n. 8 (7th Cir.1974), cert. d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
The prosecution of a defendant may be barred where the government's involvement in the criminal enterprise out of which the charges against the defendant arise "is so extensive that it may be characterized `outrageous.'" United States v. Gianni, 678 F.2d 956, 959 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982); see, e.g., United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 607 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 882-83 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Calvin Carlos Campbell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections
See, e.g., Cobb v. Wainwright, 666 F.2d 966 , 968 n. 1 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward O'Grady
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 595 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1195 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Butler, 618 F.2d 411, 417-18 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 927 , 100 S.Ct. 3024 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1121 (1980); United States v. Price, 617 F.2d 455, 458 (7th Cir.1979); United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 151 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1561 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kaye
See, e.g., United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 610-11 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph McClelland
See, e.g., United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 594-96 (3d Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Butler, 618 F.2d 411, 417-20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 927 , 100 S.Ct. 3024 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1121 (1980); United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313, 320-21 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976); United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 393 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 , 151 n. 8 (7th Cir.1974), cert.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hale v. Pringle
See, eg., Hillis v. Stephen F. Austin State University, 665 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cobb
v.
Wainwright
v.
Wainwright
No. 81-1904.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.