green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.1 score
“decrees entered by consent may be reviewed on appeal where there is a claim of lack of actual consent or a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Terry's Floor Fashions, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc. Lees Carpets, a Division of Burlington Industries, Inc. And Eatman's Carpets, Inc.
(2×)
But see Oreck v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 80-81 (2nd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981) (civil antitrust case where plaintiff was attempting to establish a conspiracy.) The court in Oreck stated: ... even if declarant’s statements were to be considered as admissions of Whirlpool as a party defendant, F.R.E. 802(d)(2)(D), in view of the complete lack of independent evidence of a conspiracy involving Sears, we hold that testimony regarding those statements should not have been admissible.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Sharon Steel Corporation, Debtor. Atlantic Richfield Company v. Sharon Steel Corporation, the Honorable Alan N. Bloch, Nominal
decrees entered by consent may be reviewed on appeal where there is a claim of lack of actual consent or a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shaw v. United States
Sands et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 58.04, Instr. 58-44 (2003); See United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290, 295-96 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 438 U.S. 422, 435-43 , 98 S.Ct. 2864 , 57 L.Ed.2d 854 (1978); UCAR Intern., Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp., 2004 WL 137073 , at * 16 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc. Patrick Pettit Elmer Lee Pettit David A. Adams
See Carolina Food, 81 F.3d at 512-13 (citing NLRB v. Martins Ferry Hospital Ass’n, 649 F.2d 445, 449 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 638 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tower Air, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.
See United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); United States v. Champion Int’l Corp., 557 F.2d 1270 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 428 , 429 54 L.Ed.2d 298 (1977); Compact v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, 594 F.Supp. 1567 (M.D.Tenn.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Medical X-Ray Film Antitrust Litigation
In order to establish a claim under Section 1, a plaintiff must be able to show: (1) concerted action, (2) by two or more persons, (3) which unreasonably restrains interstate or foreign trade or commerce: See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 78 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Anti-trust Litig., 894 F.Supp. 703, 710 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); Telectronics Proprietary, Ltd. v. Medtronic, Inc., 687 F.Supp. 832, 837 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moorman v. DEPT. OF COMM. AFFAIRS
See Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374, 1381 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Sarasota County v. Barg, 302 So.2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1974); State ex *1112 rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Department of Community Affairs
See Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981). [7] However, by stating that the hearing should be held pursuant to chapter 120, the Legislature also has indicated that the hearing should encompass more than just the record below.
discussed
Cited "see"
Balaklaw v. Lovell
See Capital Imaging Assoc., P.C. v. Mohawk Valley Medical Assoc., Inc., 791 F.Supp. 956, 964 (1992) (citing Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 133 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981)).
cited
Cited "see"
STATE, DEPT. OF ENVIR. REG. v. Schindler
See Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, Taylor v. Graham, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State, Department of Environmental Regulation v. Schindler
See Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, Taylor v. Graham, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Capital Imaging Associates v. Mohawk Valley Medical Associates, Inc.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 183 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
St. Johns County v. Owings
See Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deem v. Lockheed Corp.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 78 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Bachman Co., 659 F.Supp. 1129, 1132 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
STATE, DEPT. OF ENV. REGULATION v. MacKay
See Graham v. Estuary Prop., Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Bensch v. Metropolitan Dade County, 541 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 18, 1989); Florida Audubon Soc'y v. Ratner, 497 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), review denied, 508 So.2d 15 (Fla. 1987); Penn Cent.
discussed
Cited "see"
STATE, DEPT. OF AGR. & CONS. SERV. v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc.
See Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Morton v. Gardner, 513 So.2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Flake v. State, Dep't of Agriculture, 383 So.2d 285 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Telectronics Proprietary, Ltd. v. Medtronic, Inc.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 78 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Bachman Co., 659 F.Supp. 1129, 1132 (S.D.N.Y.1986); 2 E.
discussed
Cited "see"
Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290, 298 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Bachman Co.
See Oreck *1133 Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75 (2d Cir.1980) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Posa, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 79 (2d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. W.F. Brinkley & Son Construction Company, Inc. And William F. Brinkley, Jr.
See United States v. Koppers Co., Inc., 652 F.2d 290, 295-96, n. 6 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981) ("Where per se conduct is found, a finding of intent to conspire to commit the offense is sufficient; a requirement that intent go further and envision actual anti-competitive results would reopen the very questions of reasonableness which the per se rule is designed to avoid.”); and United States v. Brighton Building and Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101, 1106 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979) ("We do not r…
discussed
Cited "see"
Engel v. Department of Professional Regulation
See Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374, 1379 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Gershanik v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medical Examiners, 458 So.2d 302, 304 (Fla.3d DCA 1984), pet. for rev. denied, 462 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1985); Cohen v. School Board of Dade County, 450 So.2d 1238 (Fla.3d DCA 1984); Kinlaw v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 417 So.2d 802 (Fla.5th DCA 1982).
cited
Cited "see"
COMPACT v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County
See United States v. Koppers Co., Inc., 652 F.2d 290, 293-96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Barrows v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 81 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 637 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barrows v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 81 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 637 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Storall Manufacturing Co. v. United States
See United States v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, 653 F.2d 1134 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); Kansas City, Missouri v. Federal Pacific Electric Co., 310 F.2d 271 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 912 , 83 S.Ct. 256 , 9 L.Ed.2d 171 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Atlantic International Investment Corp.
See generally Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1983
See Martins Ferry Hospital Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board, 654 F.2d 455 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 638 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); Schrementi Bros. v. McCulloch, 69 LRRM 2233 (N.D.Ill.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1983
See United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290, 298 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); United States v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 467 F.2d 1000, 1004-07 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1125 , 93 S.Ct. 938 , 35 L.Ed.2d 256 (1973); United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp., 433 F.2d 174, 204-05 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 948 , 91 S.Ct. 928 , 28 L.Ed.2d 231 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Basic Construction Co.
See United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290, 298 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); United States v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 467 F.2d 1000, 1004-07 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1125 , 93 S.Ct. 938 , 35 L.Ed.2d 256 (1973); United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp., 433 F.2d 174, 204-05 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 948 , 91 S.Ct. 928 , 28 L.Ed.2d 231 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Food Town Stores, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
See Martins Ferry Hospital Ass’n v. National Labor Relations Board, 654 F.2d 455 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 638 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); Schremen-ti Bros. v. McCulloch, 69 LRRM 2233 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Transport Limousine of Long Island, Inc. v. Port Authority
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 78 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981), Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. City *587 of Pensacola, 676 F.2d 1380, 1383 (11th Cir.1982), app. for cert. pndg.
cited
Cited "see"
James R. Smith, M.D. v. Northern Michigan Hospitals, Inc.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Hollywood, Inc. v. Broward County
See Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
ca2 1983
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75 , 80 n. 3 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Litton Sys., Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75 , 80 n. 3 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Portsmouth Paving Corporation and R. Curtis Saunders, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Koppers Co., Inc., 652 F.2d 290, 293 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981) (bid rigging, territorial allocation in Connecticut highway maintenance); United States v. Azzarelli Construction Co., 612 F.2d 292, 294 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3010 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980) (bid rigging on Illinois highway projects); United States v. Flom, 558 F.2d 1179, 1183 (5th Cir.1977) (bid rigging on sales of reinforcing steel bars).
cited
Cited "see"
Bunch v. Artec International Corp.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 78 (2d Cir.1980), cert. *966 denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Crimpers Promotions, Inc. v. Home Box Office, Inc.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 78 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Ricky Smith Pontiac, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc.
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 79 (2d Cir. 1980), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1083 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tremont Public Advisors, LLC v. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority
The trial court concluded that the plaintiff had not established a per se violation of the antitrust act because, although an agreement between horizontal competing bidders, such as Brown Rudnick and the plaintiff, constitutes a per se violation; see, e.g., United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290, 294 (2d Cir.) (‘‘[o]ne of the classic examples of a per se violation of [antitrust laws] is an agreement between competitors at the same level of the market structure to allocate territories in order to minimize competition’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard A. Bolt and Richard A. Bolt, M.D. v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center
Auth., 789 F.2d 278 , 281 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 972 , 107 S.Ct. 474 , 93 L.Ed.2d 418 (1986); see also Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 79 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Feldman v. Jackson Memorial Hosp., 571 F.Supp. 1000, 1008 (S.D.Fla.1983), aff'd, 752 F.2d 647 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 3504 , 87 L.Ed.2d 635 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bensch v. Metropolitan Dade County
See Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis, 480 U.S. 470, 505-06 , 107 S.Ct. 1232, 1252-53 , 94 L.Ed.2d 472, 500-01 (1987) (compensation not required where regulation prevents harm or danger or restrains activities tantamount to public nuisance); see also Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 640 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981). [4] See supra note 2. [5] Citing e.g., United States of America v. Sponenbarger, 308 U.S. 256 , 60 S.Ct. 225 , 84 L.Ed. 230 (1939); Creppel v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 500 F. Supp. 1108 (E.D.La. 198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cooperative Theatres of Ohio, Inc. And David Beaupain
See Topco, 405 U.S. at 608 , 92 S.Ct. at 1133-34 ; see also United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed. 2d 617 (1981); United States v. Brighton Building and Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); United States v. Flom, 558 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Consolidated Laundries Corp., 291 F.2d 563 (2d Cir.1961); United States v. Rubbish Removal, 602 F.Supp. 595 (N.D.N.Y.1984); United States v. Fish Smokers Trade Council, 183 F.Supp. 227 (S.D.N.Y.1960…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
See also United States v. Koppers Co., Inc., 652 F.2d 290, 298 (2d Cir.) (holding that company could be criminally liable for antitrust violations for the acts of its managerial agents), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981). 8 In the light of these holdings sanctioning the imputation of liability where the statute’s language appears to require proof of intention, the law appears not to preclude Fus-tok from being held liable for the acts of its agents. 9 Moreover, the evidence marshalled by Minpeco in answer to Fustok’s motion for summary judgment, as summari…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mauck v. City of Martinsburg
See also Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); Troxel Mfg.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See also Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1985
See, e.g., United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290, 293-96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); United States v. Manufacturers' Association of the Relocatable Building Industry, 462 F.2d 49 , 52 (9th Cir.1972). 52 Sargent Electric argues that the court should have given a more complete instruction on sham bidding.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290, 293-96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); United States v. Manufacturers’ Association of the Relocatable Building Industry, 462 F.2d 49 , 52 (9th Cir.1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Snap-On Tools Corporation
See, e.g., Cole v. U.S., 657 F.2d 107, 108-109 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
Martins Ferry Hospital Assn.
v.
National Labor Relations Board (two cases)
v.
National Labor Relations Board (two cases)
No. 81-486.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 30, 1981.
454 U.S. 1083
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.