Blalock v. Florida, 454 U.S. 1134 (1982). · Go Syfert
Blalock v. Florida, 454 U.S. 1134 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Sayer (ca1, 2006-06-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sayer
1st Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Laws page no. 660; see also Cummings v. Town of Oakland, 430 A.2d 825, 830 (Me.1981) (discussing the legislative history of the 1973 amendment), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1134 , 102 S.Ct. 988 , 71 L.Ed.2d 286 (1982). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." ca1 2006
1st Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Laws page no. 660; see also Cummings v. Town of Oakland, 430 A.2d 825, 830 (Me.1981) (discussing the legislative history of the 1973 amendment), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1134 , 102 S.Ct. 988 , 71 L.Ed.2d 286 (1982). 5 The Sayers' counsel sought "access to the FHA's complete files, dating back to the bankruptcy filing," so the Sayers "could reconstruct their account history," and requested permission to depose an employee of the FSA's local office "to determine how the funds [the Sayers] paid to FSA were accounted for."
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lawton
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Yu, 400 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1981), appeal dismissed, Wall v. Florida, 454 U.S. 1134 , 102 S.Ct. 988 , 71 L.Ed.2d 286 (1982); State v. Smith, 58 N.J. 202 , 276 A.2d 369 (1971).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Bussey
Fla. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Yu, 400 So.2d 762 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 454 U.S. 1134 , 102 S.Ct. 988 , 71 L.Ed.2d 286 (1981).
Blalock
v.
Florida
No. 81-712.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1982.
454 U.S. 1134
Consideration, Hearing, Jurisdiction, Merits, Postpone, Question.
Published

Appeal from

Sup. Ct. Fla. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Justice Brennan would postpone further consideration of question of jurisdiction to a hearing of the case on the merits.