green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ponder v. Been
(2×)
See Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983), and J.E.M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cooper v. Shealy
See Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 75 L.
cited
Cited "see"
CD Solutions, Inc. v. Tooker
See Brown v. Flowers Indus., Inc., 688 F.2d 328 , 332 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryant v. Secretary of the Army
See Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission, 688 F.2d 1033, 1041 (5th Cir.1982) (holding that public television stations were not “public forums”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Center Capital Corporation v. Hall, No. Cv 92-0452084s (Jun. 9, 1993)
See, generally, David v. Weizman, supra, [defendants' sole contact with Connecticut was to send into it by mail and telephone fraudulent misrepresentations]; see Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 (1983); and see Froess v. Bulman, 610 F. Sup. 332 , 336-37 (D.R.I. 1984); and McFadden v. National Executive Search, Inc., 354 F. Sup. 1166 , 1171 (D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Zady Natey, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local No. 27
Workers of America, 771 F.Supp. 208, 211, 214 (S.D.Ohio 1991); accord Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243, 683 F.2d 154, 155 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); Inter-City Gas Corp. v. Boise Cascade Corp., 845 F.2d 184, 187 (8th Cir.1988) (arbitrator amends or alters agreement if interprets unambiguous language in way different from plain meaning).
cited
Cited "see"
Ficks Reed Co. v. Local 112 International Union, Allied Industrial Workers
See Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243, 683 F.2d 154, 156 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wheeler v. Teufel
See Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983); Carida v. Holy Cross Hospital, Inc., 424 So.2d 849 (Fla.App.1982); Norton v. Local Loan, 251 N.W.2d 520 (Iowa 1977); State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kathy Applewhite, Administrator of the Estate of Mark C. Applewhite v. Metro Aviation, Inc., Alabama Power Company
See Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328, 333 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983) (number of contacts with forum state not determinative of the jurisdiction issue; significant inquiry is whether contacts suggest purposeful availment by defendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Serra v. United States General Services Administration
Emerson, The System of Freedom of Expression 700 (1970)); see Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Comm'n, 688 F.2d 1033 , 1044 (5th Cir.1982) (in banc) ("the First Amendment does not preclude the government from exercising editorial control over its own medium of expression"), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Serra v. United States General Services Administration
Emerson, The System of Freedom of Expression 700 (1970)); see Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Comm'n, 688 F.2d 1033 , 1044 (5th Cir.1982) (in banc) (“the First Amendment does not preclude the government from exercising editorial control over its own medium of expression”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Strong v. RG Industries, Inc.
See Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328, 332 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 ; Visual Sciences, Inc. v. Integrated Communications, Inc., 660 F.2d 56 (2d Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaplan v. Shapiro
See Meyer v. Thomas & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., 686 F.2d 818, 819 (9th Cir.1982) (No vertical commonality in situations where “the promoter continued to profit through commissions even as the account lost money [or where,] had the account been successful, the promoter would not necessarily have shared the benefits because [the investor] could elect to withdraw profits as they accrued”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca5 1985
The district court below considered the entire record, including all discovered materials and Crimson's affidavit, in ruling on the motion to dismiss. 7 "It is well-settled that a defendant is amenable to the personal jurisdiction of a federal court in a diversity case to the extent permitted a state court in the state where the federal court sits." DeMelo v. Toche Marine, Inc., 711 F.2d at 1264 ; see Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328, 331 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983); Gold Kist, Inc. v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co., 623 F.2…
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
“It is well-settled that a defendant is amenable to the personal jurisdiction of a federal court in a diversity case to the extent permitted a state court in the state where the federal court sits.” DeMelo v. Toche Marine, Inc., 711 F.2d at 1264; see Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328, 331 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983); Gold Kist, Inc. v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co., 623 F.2d 375 (5th Cir.1980) (collecting cases).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1984
See Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission, 688 F.2d 1033, 1043-47 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); Canby, The First Amendment and the State as Editor: Implications for Public Broadcasting, 52 Tex.L.Rev. 1123, 1148-65 (1974). 18 45 A court must, however, scrutinize closely a government's dedication of a forum to a particular type of expression and fully consider a number of factors before deciding the constitutionality of such an action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cinevision Corp. v. City of Burbank
See Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission, 688 F.2d 1033, 1043-47 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); Canby, The First Amendment and the State as Editor: Implications for Public Broadcasting, 52 Tex.L.Rev. 1123, 1148-65 (1974). 18 A court must, however, scrutinize closely a government’s dedication of a forum to a particular type of expression and fully consider a number of factors before deciding the constitutionality of such an action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cosper v. Allred
See Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328, 332 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983); see also Familia de Boom v. Arosa Mercantil, S.A., 629 F.2d 1134, 1138 (5th Cir.1980), rehearing denied, 454 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 557 , 70 L.Ed.2d 418 (1981); Product Promotions, Inc. v. Cousteau, 495 F.2d 483, 489 (5th Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph A. Davis v. Herbert Simon and Bui Simon
See, e.g., Brown v. Flowers Indus., Inc., 688 F.2d 328 , 333-34 (5th Cir. 1982)[, reh‘g denied, cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S. Ct. 1275 (1983)]; Rusack v. Harsha, 470 F. Supp. 285, 291 (M.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Simon
(2×)
See, e.g., Brown v. Flowers Indus., Inc., 688 F.2d 328 , 333-34 (5th Cir.1982)[, reh'g denied, cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983)]; Rusack v. Harsha, 470 F.Supp. 285, 291 (M.D.Pa.1978); Fallang v. Hickey, 40 Ohio St.3d 106 , 532 N.E.2d 117, 118-19 (1988)....
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morris v. BC OLYMPIAKOS, SFP
See also Brown v. Flowers Industries Inc., 688 F.2d 328, 332-34 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983) (holding that a single defamatory phone call directed at a forum was sufficient to support exercise of personal jurisdiction); D.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dring v. Sullivan
See, e.g., Brown v. Flowers Indus., Inc., 688 F.2d 328 , 332-33 (1982)(5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983), ("The Mississippi long-arm statute, supra note 2, provides: ‘Any nonresident person ... who shall ... commit a tort in whole or in part in this state against a resident ... of this state ... shall by such act or acts be deemed to be doing business in Mississippi.' ") and Rusack v. Harsha, 470 F.Supp. 285, 290 (D.C.Pa.1978)("Plamtiff relies on two sections of the old Pennsylvania Long Arm Statute, 42 Pa.Cons.Stat. § 8301 et seq., as the b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carlson v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
See, e.g., Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328 , 332 (5th Cir.1982), rehearing and rehearing en banc denied, 691 F.2d 502 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983); 2A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 12.07[2.-2] (2d ed. 1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 1842, Afl-Cio v. Cincinnati Electronics Corporation
See, e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Co., Local Union No. 245 v. Teamsters, 683 F.2d 154, 155-56 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); Storer Broadcasting Co. v. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists, 600 F.2d 45, 47 (6th Cir.1979); Detroit Coil Co. v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 594 F.2d 575, 579 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calgift v. Bank One of Eastern Ohio, National Ass'n
Compare Brown v. Flowers Industry, Inc., 688 F.2d 328 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983) (defendant not denied due process by being subject to suit in the forum state when defendant directed a telephone call into the forum state and allegedly committed an intentional tort which had an injurious effect in the forum state) with Paul v. Int’l Precious Metals Corp., 613 F.Supp. 174 (S.D.Miss.1985) (emphasizing that Brown dealt with a defamatory telephone call) and Haghighi v. Merchants Bank, North, supra (emphasizing that Brown concerned an inten…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gene Mcgill v. American Land & Exploration Company
See, e.g., Meyer v. Thomas & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., 686 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); S.E.C. v. Continental Commodities Corp., 497 F.2d 516 (5th Cir.1974); cf. Booth v. Peavey Co. Commodities Services, 430 F.2d 132 (8th Cir.1970) 4 Our common sense conclusion that there was a "common enterprise" is buttressed by the language of the joint venture agreement, which provides, inter alia: ... [Commercial Funding Corporation] and [Gene McGill] desire to become associated in business for the development and sale of lots i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGill v. American Land & Exploration Co.
See, e.g., Meyer v. Thomas & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., 686 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); S.E.C. v. Continental Commodities Corp., 497 F.2d 516 (5th Cir.1974); cf. Booth v. Peavey Co. Commodities Services, 430 F.2d 132 (8th Cir.1970). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward Hines Lumber Company of Oregon v. Lumber and Sawmill Workers Local No. 2588 and Central Oregon District Council, Lpiw
(2×)
See e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243, 683 F.2d 154, 156 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
Borough of Sayreville
v.
Middlesex County Utilities Authority
v.
Middlesex County Utilities Authority
No. 82-1154.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.