green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
“hether there has been such a seizure in an individual case is a question of fact”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ralph D. Harris and Joan F. Harris v. United States
But cf. Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364 , 1367 & n. 5 (11th Cir.) (appellate court has inherent equitable powers to supplement the record to include state court trial transcript in habeas corpus action), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Atkinson
hether there has been such a seizure in an individual case is a question of fact
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Downey
(2×)
See State v. Ostroski, 186 Conn. 287, 292 , 440 A.2d 984 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S. Ct. 173 , 74 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. White
“This court’s inherent equitable powers allow it to supplement the record with information not reviewed by the district [court], though this power is not often exercised.” Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co., 883 F.2d 1553, 1555 (11th Cir.1989); see Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1367 (11th Cir.) (“While federal appellate courts do not often supplement the record on appeal with evidence not reviewed by the court below, it is clear that the authority to do so exists.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982); see also First Alabama Bank v. Parsons Steel, …
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Jones v. Warden J.D. White Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Circuit Court of MacOn County, William H. Mardis v. Charlie Jones, Warden Don Siegelman, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, Larry Wayne Garrett v. Charlie Jones, Warden and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Terry Wayne McLester v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner of the State of Alabama, Department of Corrections James H. Evans, Attorney General for the State of Alabama W.E. Johnson, Warden, Holman Station
In a limited situation, such supplementation is appropriate. 93 "This court's inherent equitable powers allow it to supplement the record with information not reviewed by the district [court], though this power is not often exercised." Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co., 883 F.2d 1553, 1555 (11th Cir.1989); see Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1367 (11th Cir.) ("While federal appellate courts do not often supplement the record on appeal with evidence not reviewed by the court below, it is clear that the authority to do so exists."), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.
Turk v. United States, 429 F.2d 1327, 1329 (8th Cir.1970); see Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1367 (11th Cir.) (“while federal courts do not often supplement the record on appeal with evidence not reviewed by the court below, it is clear that the authority to do so exists”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982); see also United States v. Aulet, 618 F.2d 182, 187 (2d Cir.1980) (finding that the appellate court has authority under Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
James Pettaway v. Charles Plummer, Sheriff of Alameda County
See Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1366-68 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Willie X. Ross v. Ralph Kemp
(2×)
See Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364 , 1367 n. 5 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Martin
Third, whether there was, in any given set of circumstances, a reasonable and articulable suspicion is in the first instance a question of fact for the trial court; see State v. Ostroski, 186 Conn. 287, 292 , 440 A.2d 984 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S. Ct. 173 , 74 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Rauleron v. Wainwright
See Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Raulerson v. Wainwright
See Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Harold FENDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert GOLDSMITH, and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
See generally Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1368-69 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982) (“[A]ny denial of an accused’s attempt to present testimony in his behalf must be weighed against [the Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process.] The determination of whether the denial was such an abuse of discretion as to violate an accused’s Sixth Amendment right is a question of law.”); Hicks v. Wainwright, 633 F.2d 1146 (5th Cir.1981) (same); Panzavecchia v. Wainwright, 658 F.2d 337 , 339 n. 2 (5th Cir.1981) (“If not a pure question of law…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Calkins, No. Mv 00 0206005 (Sep. 6, 2001)
"Custody for CT Page 12491 Miranda purposes is a factual determination." Id.; see also State v. Ostroski , 186 Conn. 287 , 292 , 440 A.2d 984 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alejandro
See also Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1370 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).” The evaluation of these criteria is within the sound discretion of the trial court.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alfred F. Tonry v. Security Experts, Inc., and Robert Foglia
(2×)
See, e.g., Dickerson v. State of Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1367 (11th Cir.1982) (discretion to do so rests with court of appeal), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982). 12 45 In sum, SEI's conduct violated both the district court's local rules and the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter Lodge
See also Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1370 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Holland v. McGinnis
The “unsupported” factual findings of a tribunal unable “to test the credibility of witnesses by observing their demeanor in the course of direct and cross-examination are usually not dispositive in a federal habeas proceeding.” Finkbeiner, 570 F.2d at 201 ; see also Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1368 (11th Cir.) (“factual determinations of a state appellate court are to be accorded a presumption of correctness only to the ex tent that they are ‘fairly supported by the record’ ”) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(8)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pedro Garcia, Lazaro Lopez, Jaime Cruz, Joseph Lovett
See also Dickerson v. State of Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1370 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. King
See United States v. Little, 567 F.2d 346, 348-49 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 1608 , 56 L.Ed.2d 60 (1978) (trial court properly denied continuance where no showing witness would be available or what his testimony would be); see also Dickerson v. State of Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1370 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982); Hicks v. Wainwright, 633 F,2d 1146, 1149 (5th Cir.1981); Singleton v. Lefkowitz, 583 F.2d 618 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 929 , 99 S.Ct. 1266 , 59 L.Ed.2d 486 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mitchell
See State v. Braxton, 196 Conn. 685 , 688 n.2, 495 A.2d 273 (1985); see also State v. Ostroski, 186 Conn. 287, 290-92 , 440 A.2d 984 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S. Ct. 173 , 74 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold J. Garmany
Compare Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1370-71 (11th Cir.) (denial of continuance, which prevented defense from presenting non-cumulative, relevant testimony of alibi witness, violated right to compulsory process), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Perry
Ed. 2d 607 (1980); see also State v. Ostroski, 186 Conn. 287 , 440 A.2d 984 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S. Ct. 173 , 74 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Agha Kaleem Ullah Khan
See, e.g., Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1369 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Marino
(2×)
State v. Ostroski, 184 Conn. 455, 460 , 440 A.2d 166 (1981); see also State v. Ostroski, 186 Conn. 287, 290 , 440 A.2d 984 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 978 , 103 S. Ct. 173 , 74 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bordenkircher, Superintendent, West Virginia Penitentiary
v.
Adkins
v.
Adkins
No. 81-2164.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.