green
Positive treatment
10.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christy
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christy
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harmon
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez-Lopez
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Romero
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rey
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moya-Matute
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982). cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moya-Matute
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982). cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mikulski
(2×)
It is important to note that “Terry has come to stand for two distinct propositions — an investigative detention (‘stop’) in which a police officer, for the purposes of investigation, may briefly detain a person on less than probable ' cause, ... [citations omitted] and a protective search (‘frisk’) which permits an officer, in the course of an investigative detention, to conduct a limited search for weapons for his or her own protection.” United States v. King, 990 F.2d *1207 1552, 1557 (10th Cir.1993); accord, United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1271 (10th Cir.1982), cert.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean Jackson
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Susan H. McDougal
See Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d 760, 766 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Susan H. McDougal
See Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d 760, 766 (8th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Pullam
See Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826, 831-32 (9th Cir.1982) (holding inquiry adequate where district court "invited defendant to make a statement, listened to defendant's reasons for desiring new counsel, and found them to be without merit"), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 (1983); United States v. Castro, 972 F.2d 1107, 1109-10 (9th Cir.1992) (holding inquiry adequate where district court specifically questioned defendant and addressed each concern of defendant), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1350 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Jose S. Chacon v. Tana Wood
See Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826, 830 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1896 , 77 L.Ed.2d 285 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Hatley McCrary v. Wayne Estelle, Warden
See Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826, 829 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 (1983) (noting that the denial of a defendant's motion for new counsel may violate the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel) 2 In their memorandum of points and authorities in answer to the district court's order to show cause, the Attorney General of California asserted that McCrary had omitted the claim.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Theodrick Parks
See Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826, 829 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Larry Dewayne Usher v. Jimmy Jones
See Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d 760, 767 (8th Cir.1982) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Melvin Pulliam, Also Known as Melvin Parker v. John W. Duncan, Warden
See Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 (1983). 4 Pulliam's remaining arguments are likewise meritless.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Calvin Lyniol Robinson
See Appellant’s Opening Brief at 26-27 (citing Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1896 , 77 L.Ed.2d 285 (1983); United States v. Williams, 594 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir.1979); Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166 (9th Cir.1970)). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Donnell George
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1268-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983); cf. United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1077 (9th Cir.1988) (“magistrate may consider hearsay statements in an affidavit in determining whether there is probable cause to believe that a person is guilty of a crime”).
cited
Cited "see"
Steven D. Click v. United States
See Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464, 466 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George S. Bartley, Jr.
See Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d 760, 766 (8th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Joseph Owens
See Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1896 , 77 L.Ed. 2d 285 (1983); United States v. Mills, 597 F.2d 693 (9th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosenbarger v. United States
See Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464, 467 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 (1983); Pate v. Smith, 637 F.2d 1068, 1072 (6th Cir.1981). 7 Clearly, under all these circumstances, petitioner's plea was valid as the record reflects that the proceedings were consistent with the rudimentary demands of fair procedure.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Pursifell
See Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826, 831 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1896 , 77 L.Ed.2d 285 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Delbert W. Wadsworth and Kurt W. Wadsworth
(2×)
See Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826, 829 (9th Cir.1982) ("The trial court must take the time to conduct such necessary inquiry as might ease the defendant's dissatisfaction, distrust, and concern"), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1896 , 77 L.Ed.2d 285 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Berndt v. State
See Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464 , (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 287 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rhoden
(2×)
See Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 287 (1983); Pate v. Smith, 637 F.2d 1068, 1072 (6th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas Simmons v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, and Steve Clark, Attorney General, State of Arkansas
See Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d 760, 765 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Frances E. King v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Secretary of Transportation
Devine v. White, 697 F.2d 421 (D.C.Cir.1983); accord Miller v. United States Postal Service, 685 F.2d 148 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricky Lee Newton
(2×)
See also Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464, 467 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 287 (1983). 4 A defendant is incompetent to stand trial when he does not have "sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding — and whether he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him." Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, 402 , 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960) (internal quotation marks omitted). 50 I believe that Newton's defense counsel's statements on two of the three d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Newton
See also Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464, 467 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 (1983).4 A defendant is incompetent to stand trial when he does not have 3 As the majority notes, only evidence seized from those two properties was used at trial. 4 Although Pate and Williams are state habeas cases, as are later published cases reaffirming their standard of review, see, e.g., Mackey v. Dutton, 217 F.3d 399, 413-14 (6th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1087 (2001), it stands to reason that our standard of review on direct appeal from a district court would certainly be no more defere…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clarence Victor v. Frank X. Hopkins
See Castille v. Peoples, 489 U.S. 346, 349 , 109 S.Ct. 1056, 1059 , 103 L.Ed.2d 380 (1989) (“Respondent’s habeas petition should have been dismissed if state remedies had not been exhausted as to any of the federal claims.”); Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 325 , 109 S.Ct. 1060, 1083 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989) (Stevens, J., concurring) (“In Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 , 102 S.Ct. 1198 , 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982), the Court announced that a habeas petition containing exhausted and unexhaust-ed claims must be dismissed.”); Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 124 n. 25, 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 1570 n. 25, …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Bland, Jr. v. California Department of Corrections Attorney General of the State of California
Id.; see also Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826, 830 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1896 , 77 L.Ed.2d 285 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Lee Smith v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
When a defendant raises a seemingly substantial complaint about counsel, the judge “has an obligation to inquire thoroughly into the factual basis of defendant’s dissatisfaction.” Hart, 557 F.2d at 163 ; see also Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826, 829 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1896 , 77 L.Ed.2d 285 (1983); Schwarzer, Dealing with Incompetent Counsel — The Trial Judge’s Role, 93 Harv.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Czmowski
(2×)
"In assessing police justifications for arrests or intrusions of a type less offensive than full arrests, we take an objective view of all the facts and may evaluate the knowledge of all the officers collectively." Brewer v. Wolff, 529 F.2d 787, 790 (8th Cir.1976); see also United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982) (same principles apply to investigatory stops), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnes v. Housewright
See also Hudson v. Rushen, 686 F.2d 826, 831 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1896 , 77 L.Ed.2d 285 (1983) (balancing such factors as defendant’s right to congenial counsel against society’s interest in prompt administration of justice, the trial court’s inquiry into defendant’s dissatisfaction with counsel should be “as comprehensive as the circumstances reasonably would permit.”) This Court is convinced that the trial court had ample justification for denying Barnes’ motions.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joe C. Long v. United States Department of the Air Force
Parissi v. Telechron, Inc., 349 U.S. 46 , 75 S.Ct. 577 , 99 L.Ed. 867 (1955); accord Brennan v. United States Gypsum Co., 330 F.2d 728, 729 (10th Cir.1964) (untimely payment of filing fee did not vitiate validity of notice of appeal when it was received within the thirty day period); see also Miller v. United States Postal Service, 685 F.2d 148, 149 (5th Cir.1982) (petition for review from MSPB’s decision not timely when mailed before expiration of thirty day period, but not received until after expiration of this period), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983); …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Groseclose Ex Rel. Harries v. Dutton
See, e.g., Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464, 466-67 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 287 (1983).
Bouma et ux.
v.
Larry C. Iverson, Inc.
v.
Larry C. Iverson, Inc.
No. 82-1625.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 2, 1983.
Published
Sup. Ct. Mont. Certiorari denied.