green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Benavidez v. Eu
See Harris County Commissioners Court v. Moore, 420 U.S. 77 , 88 n. 14, 95 S.Ct. 870 , 877 n. 14, 43 L.Ed.2d 32 (1975) 7 Both the District Court and Governor Wilson also rely on Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691 (5th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1012 , 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982) as precedent for federal courts abstaining in voting rights cases, but in fact the Duncan court declined to abstain under Pullman, concluding that "Pullman abstention is simply inappropriate in the circumstances of this case." Id. at 699
cited
Cited "see"
Dwayne Arnaud and Ellen Arnaud v. Charles B. Odom, Jr., Mary Ann Tolliver and Paul Felix v. Charles B. Odom, Jr. And Robert B. Thompson
See Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691, 700 (5th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1012 , 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Esteban Madruga
See Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691, 708 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit B), cert. granted, 455 U.S. 937 , 102 S.Ct. 1426 , 71 L.Ed.2d 647 , cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1012 , 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982). 3 Although we note that a district court’s conclusion regarding whether a party’s actions before a federal magistrate were sufficient to preserve the party’s legal rights on appeal to the district court is probably a question of law — or at least a mixed question of fact and law 4 — we need not reach *1013 that issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert E. Badham v. United States District Court For The Northern District Of California
We have stated "that there is no per se civil rights exception to the abstention doctrine." C-Y Development, 703 F.2d at 381 ; accord Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691, 697 (5th Cir.1981) ("An alleged denial of voting rights does not, in itself, constitute a 'special circumstance' which automatically precludes federal court abstention."), cert. granted, 455 U.S. 937 , 102 S.Ct. 1426 , 71 L.Ed.2d 647 , cert. dismissed, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Badham v. United States District Court
We have stated “that there is no per se civil rights exception to the abstention doctrine.” C-Y Development, 703 F.2d at 381 ; accord Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691, 697 (5th Cir.1981) (“An alleged denial of voting rights does not, in itself, constitute a ‘special circumstance’ which automatically precludes federal court abstention.”), cert. granted, 455 U.S. 937 , 102 S.Ct. 1426 , 71 L.Ed.2d 647 , cert. dismissed, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall v. Holder
(2×)
See, e.g., Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691, 703 (5th Cir. Unit B Sept.1981) (state election practice violates due process and warrants federal intervention if it involves " 'patent and fundamental fairness' "), cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1012 , 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. Frank Curry and Daniel R. Farnell, Sr., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Stated v. John Baker, as Chairman of the Alabama State Democratic Executive Committee and the Alabama State Democratic Executive Committee, William J. Baxley, Jerry Henderson, Dejerilynn Henderson, Charles Kennith Pike & Nellie Kent Pike, Intervenors-Appellants, Charles D. Graddick v. John Baker, as Chairman of the State Democratic Executive Committee, and the State Democratic Executive Committee, Jerry Henderson, Dejerilynn Henderson and William J. Baxley, Intervenors-Appellants
Gamza v. Aguirre, 619 F.2d 449, 452 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 625 F.2d 1016 (1980); see also Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691 (5th Cir. Unit B), reh'g denied, 664 F.2d 291 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 937 , 102 S.Ct. 1426 , 71 L.Ed.2d 647 cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1012 , 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Curry v. Baker
Gamza v. Aguirre, 619 F.2d 449, 452 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 625 F.2d 1016 (1980); see also Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691 (5th Cir. Unit B), reh’g denied, 664 F.2d 291 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 937 , 102 S.Ct. 1426 , 71 L.Ed.2d 647 cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1012 , 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Collier v. City of Springdale
See also Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691, 704-05 (5th Cir.1981) (Parratt inapplicable to alleged voting rights violation), cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1012 , 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982); Morehead v. Virgin Islands, 556 F.Supp. 174, 176-77 (D.V.I.1983) (Parratt does not apply to alleged violations of one's first amendment right to free speech).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Collier v. City of Springdale
See also Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691, 704-05 (5th Cir.1981) (Parratt inapplicable to alleged voting rights violation), cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1012 , 103 S.Ct. 368 , 74 L.Ed.2d 504 (1982); Morehead v. Virgin Islands, 556 F.Supp. 174, 176-77 (D.V.I.1983) (Parratt does not apply to alleged violations of one’s first amendment right to free speech).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Counihan, Temporary Administrator
v.
Department of Transportation of Georgia
v.
Department of Transportation of Georgia
No. 82-519.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1982.
Appeal, Blackmun, Dismiss, Question, Want.
Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Ga. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Justice Blackmun and Justice O’Connor would dismiss the appeal for want of a properly presented federal question.