green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
“it is plain . . . that the 'liberty' protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment includes the right to the custody of one's minor children.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Holly Farms Corp v. NLRB
But see, at least as to live- 20 haul drivers, NLRB v. Hudson Farms, Inc., 681 F.2d 1105 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 (1982).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Holly Farms Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
But see, at least as to live-haul drivers, NLRB v. Hudson Farms, Inc., 681 F.2d 1105 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982). ÍI With respect, to the second error of law committed by the Board, the facts were stipulated by the parties.
cited
Cited "but see"
Nos. 93-1710, 93-1882
But see, at least as to live-haul drivers, NLRB v. Hudson Farms, Inc., 681 F.2d 1105 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Courter v. Elkhart County
it is plain . . . that the 'liberty' protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment includes the right to the custody of one's minor children.
discussed
Cited "see"
Santos v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF CHILDREN
See Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 514 (7th Cir.) (assuming great-aunt has liberty interest in retaining custody of children who had lived with her for "long stretches of time"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Santos v. County of Los Angeles Department of Children & Family Services
See Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 514 (7th Cir.) (assuming great-aunt has liberty interest in retaining custody of children who had lived with her for “long stretches of time”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gruby v. Brady
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 270 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982). 11 “[F]or the provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 1106 to apply, there must be a transaction involving the monies, property, or other assets of the fund.” Amato v. Western Union Int’l, Inc., 596 F.Supp. 963, 969 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (quoting Sutton v. Weirton Steel Div. of Nat’l Steel Corp., 567 F.Supp. 1184, 1199 (N.D.W.Va.1983), ajfd, 724 F.2d 406 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1205 , 104 S.Ct. 2387 , 81 L.Ed.2d 345 (1984)), ajfd in part and rev’d in part on other gr…
cited
Cited "see"
Semmler v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 272-73 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); Miller v. United Welfare Fund, 72 F.3d 1066, 1073 (2d Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 276 (2d Cir.) (“the appointment of a receiver is a harsh remedy, not to be imposed without a showing of necessity”), cer t. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mason Tenders Dist. Council of Greater NY
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); Whitfield v. Cohen, 682 F.Supp. 188, 195 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (“The failure to make any independent investigation and evaluation of a potential plan investment is a breach of fiduciary obligations.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Riley v. Murdock
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Loraine Mullins Charles Mullins v. State of Oregon Oregon Children's Services Division Kay Dean Toran, Administrator Mary Acklin
See Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 513-14 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. Allen
See Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 515 (7th Cir.1982) ("there is no denial of due process if the state provides reasonable remedies" and the plaintiffs fail to avail themselves of them), certiorari denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. Allen
See Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 515 (7th Cir.1982) (“there is no denial of due process if the state provides reasonable remedies” and the plaintiffs fail to avail themselves of them), certiorari denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Siskind v. The Sperry Retirement Program
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); see also Murphy v. International Business Machines Corp., 23 F.3d 719, 720-21 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (upholding denial of exit-incentive benefits to an employee considered a "critical resource" where plan gave administrator discretionary authority to determine eligibility based on management's business needs), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 204 , 130 L.Ed.2d 134 (1994). 25 Morse deals with the administrative denial of benefits rather than a structural plan amendme…
discussed
Cited "see"
Siskind v. Sperry Retirement Program, Unisys
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); see also Murphy v. International Business Machines Corp., 23 F.3d 719, 720-21 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (upholding denial of exit-incentive benefits to an employee considered a “critical resource” where plan gave administrator discretionary authority to determine eligibility based on management’s business needs), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 204 , 130 L.Ed.2d 134 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Callahan v. Lancaster-Lebanon Intermediate Unit 13
See Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 515 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982) (Due Process not violated “if the state provides reasonable remedies for preventing families from being arbitrarily broken up by local domestic relations officers.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
New York State Teamsters Council Health & Hospital Fund v. Estate of DePerno
Retirement Fund v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 964 F.2d 142 , 148 (2d Cir.1992); see Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 270-271 (2d Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); Kirshner v. United States, 603 F.2d 234, 242 (2d Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2821 , 61 L.Ed.2d 274 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Valley National Bank
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263 , 272 n. 8 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); Employee Retirement Income and Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002 (21)(A) (West Supp. 1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hutson Ex Rel. Hutson v. Bell
See Bell, 746 F.2d 1205 (7th Cir.1984) (Due process clause protects parent’s liberty interest in parent-child relationship) citing Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 512 (7th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 631 (1982); Drollinger v. Milligan, 552 F.2d 1220 , 1226-1227 (7th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Frank M. Berlin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Berlin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Schaefer v. Arkansas Medical Society
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul C. Schaefer v. Arkansas Medical Society
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Clarke v. Bank of New York
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 538 F.Supp. 463, 470 (E.D.N.Y.1981), mod. on other grounds, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa Nostra
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 276-77 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982). 34 .
cited
Cited "see"
Brock v. Gillikin
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 538 F.Supp. 463 (E.D.N.Y.1981), modified on other grounds, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Menendez v. Founders Financial Corp.
See Philko Aviation, Inc. v. Shacket, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 487 , 74 L.Ed.2d 630 (1982); Compass Insurance Co. v. Moore, 621 F.Supp. 125 (E.D.Mo. 1985); 49 U.S.C. § 1403 (c) (1982); § 329.01, Fla.Stat. (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mcmahon v. Mcdowell
See Sutton v. National Steel Corp., 724 F.2d 406 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied 467 U.S. 1205 , 104 S.Ct. 2387 , 81 L.Ed.2d 345 (1984). 42 Moreover, fiduciaries have a Section 404 obligation "to avoid placing themselves in a position where their acts as directors or officers of the corporation will prevent their functioning with the complete loyalty to participants demanded of them as trustees." Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co.
Accord, Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 270 (2d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. John C. Bierwirth, Robert G. Freese, Carl A. Paladino, Joseph W. Ullman, Lillian E. Baldissard, Rita v. Hafner, Anthony Pancella, Jr., Kathleen T. Chew and Benjamin L. Crews, Intervenors-Defendants. Robert J. Lawrence v. Grumman Corporation Pension Plan, Grumman Corporation Employee Investment Plan, Carl A. Paladino, John C. Bierwirth, Robert G. Freese, Robert W. Bradshaw, Howard J. Dunn and Grumman Corporation, Carl A. Paladino, John C. Bierwirth and Robert G. Freese
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 270 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982) 8 The Secretary disagrees with our interpretation of MacDonald as being based on the plaintiff's ability after disclosure to mitigate additional losses.
cited
Cited "see"
Donovan v. Bierwirth
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 270 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. City of Milwaukee
See Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 512 (7th Cir.1982) (due process clause protects parents’ liberty interest in relationship with children), certiorari denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 ; Drollinger v. Milligan, 552 F.2d 1220, 1226-1227 (7th Cir.1977) (due process clause protects interest in the nurturing and development of a child or grandchild).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. City of Milwaukee, Howard Johnson and Edwin Shaffer, Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. Thomas Grady, Jr., Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. City of Milwaukee
See Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 512 (7th Cir.1982) (due process clause protects parents' liberty interest in relationship with children), certiorari denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 ; Drollinger v. Milligan, 552 F.2d 1220, 1226-1227 (7th Cir.1977) (due process clause protects interest in the nurturing and development of a child or grandchild). 199 Additionally, the legislative history of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, though not expressive on the specific issues, indicates that the Act was meant to create a remedy where the parent-child relationship was interfered wit…
cited
Cited "see"
Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William Engle
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 538 F.Supp. 463, 470 (E.D.N.Y.1981), aff’d as modified, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA
See, e.g., Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); Andrade v. Parsons Corp., 972 F.2d 1336 , 1992 WL 182218 (9th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State ex rel. Stewart v. Stewart
See e.g., Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldwin v. Iowa Select Farms, L.P.
See, e.g., NLRB v. Hudson Farms, Inc., 681 F.2d 1105, 1106 (8th Cir.) .(holding that employees who transported live poultry from an independent grower’s farm to their employer’s processing plant were not “agricultural laborers,” citing Bayside), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); Valmac Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 599 F.2d 246, 249 (8th Cir.1979) (concluding that employees who transported products away from the farm did not do work that was either “primary” or “secondary” farming); see also Reich v. Tiller Helicopter Servs., Inc., 8 F.3d 1018, 1023-3…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Ives
Compare Drollinger v. Milligan, 552 F.2d 1220 , 1227 n. 6 (7th Cir.1977), with Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 513 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Ives
Compare Drollinger v. Milligan, 552 F.2d _______ __________ ________ 1220, 1227 n.6 (7th Cir. 1977), with Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 ____ _____ ________ F.2d 510, 513 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 (1982). ____________ Similarly, in one case the Supreme Court recognized a protected due process right against a false government designation made with no opportunity for challenge.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kennedy v. Kennedy
See, e.g., Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510 (7th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982) (adoptive grandmother, who served as de facto mother had liberty interest in continued custody of several children); see generally Ward, 537 A.2d at 1067-68 . 2 Grandmother has failed to demonstrate that her interest in continued contact with B.K. gives rise to due process considerations.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morris v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.
Section 1104 imposes an “unwavering duty on an ERISA trustee to make decisions with single-minded devotion to a plan’s participants ...” Adams v. Avondale Indus., 905 F.2d 943, 946 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 517 , 112 L.Ed.2d 529 (1990) (quoting Morse v. Stanley, 732 F.2d 1139, 1145 (2d Cir.1984)); see also Donovan v. Bierwirbh, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Castro v. ITT Corp.
This proposition is well established: [O]ur courts will not give “extra-territorial effect” to a confiscatory decree of a foreign state, even where directed against its own nationals. *679 Maltina Corp. v. Cawy Bottling Co., 462 F.2d 1021, 1025 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1060 , 93 S.Ct. 555 , 34 L.Ed.2d 512 (1972); see also Tran Qui Than v. Regan, 658 F.2d 1296, 1303-1304 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 487 , 74 L.Ed.2d 630 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Norman S. Adams v. Avondale Industries, Inc. Connell Industries, Inc. Connell Limited Partnership
See also Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 271 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Cypert
See also Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263 , 272 n. 8 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles S. Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc. Charles S. Foltz, John Kirby v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc. David B. Richardson v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.
See, e.g., Edwards, 757 F.2d at 56-57. 55 Plaintiffs would also infer from Sec. 404(a)(1)(B)'s requirement that plan fiduciaries exercise the "care, skill, prudence and diligence" of a "prudent man" that we owe their valuation decision no deference, since, they say, the fiduciary standard exacted is "the highest known to law." In support of this view they cite Donovan v. Cunningham, 716 F.2d 1455 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1251 , 104 S.Ct. 3533 , 82 L.Ed.2d 839 (1984), and Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hagan v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
See also Donovan v. Bierwirth, 538 F.Supp. 463, 468 (D.C.N.Y.1981), aff'd. as modified (on other grounds), 680 F.2d 263 (2nd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Teamsters Local No. 145 v. Kuba
See, e.g., Donovan v. Bierwirth, 538 F.Supp. 463, 470 (E.D.N.Y.1981), modified on other grounds, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982) (“when a fiduciary has dual loyalties, his independent investigation into the basis for an investment decision which presents a potential conflict of interests must be both intensive and scrupulous and must be discharged with the greatest degree of care that could be expected under all the circumstances by reasonable beneficiaries and participants of the plan”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donovan v. Walton
See, e.g., Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); Marshall v. Glass/Metal Association and Glaziers and Glass-workers Pension Plan, 507 F.Supp. 378 (D.Haw.1980); Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank, 485 F.Supp. 629 (W.D.Wis. 1979). 22 Two points are to be gleaned from *1240 these decisions.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramos v. Gallo
See, e.g., Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F.2d 510, 515 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982); Rutledge v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345 , 1352 (9th Cir.1981), affd on other grounds sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.
v.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
v.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
No. 82-411.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Indiana (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted.