green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
S & M BRANDS, INC. v. Summers
See Wright v. Holbrook, 794 F.2d 1152, 1156 (6th Cir.1986) (“It is impermissible to mention an issue for the first time in a reply brief, because the appellee then has no opportunity to respond.”) (quoting Knighten v. Comm’r, 702 F.2d 59 , 60 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 249 , 78 L.Ed.2d 237 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale E. Birdsell
See Knighten v. C.I.R., 702 F.2d 59 , 60 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 249 , 78 L.Ed.2d 237 (1983); Beerly v. Department of Treasury, 768 F.2d 942, 949 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Whitney National Bank
(2×)
Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.1993); see also, Knighten v. C.I.R., 702 F.2d 59, 60 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 249 , 78 L.Ed.2d 237 (1983) (forbidding parties from raising issues for the first time in the reply brief).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holder
v.
Stephenson, Superintendent, North Carolina Department of Corrections
v.
Stephenson, Superintendent, North Carolina Department of Corrections
No. 83-5268.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1983.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.