green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Yamaha Corporation v. Ess Technology, Inc.
See Smith Int'l, Inc. v. Hughes Tools Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1581 , 219 USPQ 686, 692 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Alliance Research Corp. v. Telular Corp.
See Smith Int’l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
The Conair Group, Inc. v. Automatik Apparate-Maschinenbau Gmbh and Automatik MacHinery Corp., Automatik Apparate-Maschinenbau Gmbh v. The Conair Group, Inc.
See Smith Int'l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1579 , 219 USPQ 686, 691 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Conair Group, Inc. v. Automatik Apparate-Maschinenbau GmbH
See Smith Int’l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1579 , 219 USPQ 686, 691 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lund Industries, Incorporated v. Go Industries, Inc.
See Hybritech, 849 F.2d at 1451 , 7 USPQ2d at 1196 (citing Smith Int'l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1578 , 219 USPQ 686, 690 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheldon I. Wieland, Jr. v. Robert Brown, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
See United States v. Lewis, 716 F.2d 16, 23 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Motlagh v. United States, 464 U.S. 996 (1983). 44 Furthermore, any possible prejudice that arose from the overlap in the information against Wieland was cured through the interchange between the court and jury.
cited
Cited "see"
E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
See Smith Int'l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1581 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hassan Shabazz v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, Commissioner, and Harold J. Smith, Superintendent
See, e.g., Capoeman, 754 F.2d at 1513-16 (standard unclear in 1981); Sweet v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, 529 F.2d 854, 863 (4th Cir.1975); see Madyun v. Franzen, 704 F.2d 954 , 960 n. 7 (7th Cir.) (deference to prison administrators absent a showing by substantial evidence that challenged policy constitutes an exaggerated response to security considerations), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983); Comment, The Religious Rights of the Incarcerated, 125 U.Pa.L.Rev. 812, 837-56 (1977) (circuits followed at least seven different standards when analyzing pri…
cited
Cited "see"
Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott Laboratories
See Smith Int'l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1579 , 219 USPQ 686, 691 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
H.H. Robertson, Company v. United Steel Deck, Inc. And Nicholas J. Bouras, Inc.
See generally Smith International, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1577-79 , 219 USPQ 686, 689-90 (Fed Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 , 220 USPQ 385 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones Company
(2×)
See Smith International, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Company, 718 F.2d 1573 , 219 USPQ 686 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983). 7 Having enjoined the infringer, a patent owner who is confronted with another possible infringement by that party in the form of a modified device will very likely seek to invoke the power of the court to punish the adjudged infringer for contempt in violating the court's injunctive order.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Permahedge, Inc. v. Barcana, Inc.
Id,.; see also Smith Int'l Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1578 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ewish v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lewis, 716 F.2d 16, 19 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 492 , 78 L.Ed.2d 686 (1983); Scarborough v. State, 50 Md.App. 276 , 437 A.2d 672 (1981); People v. Ricardo B., 130 A.D.2d 213 , 518 N.Y.S.2d 843, 847 (N.Y.), appeal granted, 70 N.Y.2d 749 , 520 N.Y.S.2d 1024 , 514 N.E.2d 1376 (1987), order affirmed by, 73 N.Y.2d 228 , 538 N.Y.S.2d 796 , 535 N.E.2d 1336 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Value Group, Inc. v. Mendham Lake Estates, L.P.
DISCUSSION A. The Standard for Preliminary Injunctions It is fundamental that “the purpose of a[n] interlocutory injunction is to preserve the status quo to protect the respective rights of the parties pending determination on the merits.” Cordis Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc., 780 F.2d 991, 994 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1115 , 106 S.Ct. 1971 , 90 L.Ed.2d 655 (1986); see also, Smith International, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1578 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronnie Smith v. Margarett Bingham
Compare Madyun v. Franzen, 704 F.2d 954 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983) (state prison regulations that required female prisoners to be frisked only by female security guards while male prisoners were subject to being frisked by female security guards did not violate equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment) with Pitts v. Thornburgh, 866 F.2d 1450 (D.C.Cir.1989) (incarcerating female offenders farther from D.C. than male offenders were incarcerated did not violate equal protection).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Epic Metals Corporation v. H.H. Robertson Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Smith Int’l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1579 , 219 USPQ 686, 691 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 493 , 78 L.Ed.2d 687 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Parking Meter Advertising, Inc. v. Visual Media, Inc., Warren Lincoln Bouve, Michael Haughey and Elizabeth F. Neer
See also Smith Int'l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1578 , 219 USPQ 686, 690 (Fed.Cir.) ("reluctance" to grant preliminary injunction because standard "unusually stringent"), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 996 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Suarez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-646.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1983.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.