Thigpen v. Roberts, 464 U.S. 1006 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Thigpen v. Roberts, 464 U.S. 1006 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 · …the essential characteristic of an invalid tying arrangement lies in the seller's exploitation of its control over the tying product at p. 521 ⚠ not in text
14 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Town Sound And Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation (ca3, 1992-03-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Town Sound And Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation
3rd Cir. · 1992 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the essential characteristic of an invalid tying arrangement lies in the seller's exploitation of its control over the tying product
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Town Sound & Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
3rd Cir. · 1992 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the essential characteristic of an invalid tying arrangement lies in the seller's exploitation of its control over the tying product
discussed Cited "see" Gregory Alberico v. The United States (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Service Research Group, 464 U.S. 1006 , 104 S.Ct. 522 , 78 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group (2×)
SCOTUS · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
Title IV aid is available for a broad range of postsecondary educational programs at colleges, universities, and vocational schools. 20 U. S. C. § 1085 (a); see n. 1, supra. [14] 128 Cong.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thigpen, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
v.
Roberts
No. 82-1330.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1983.
464 U.S. 1006
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 461 U. S. 956.] It appearing that respondent is not represented by a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that Rhesa H. Barksdale, Esquire, of Jackson, Miss., is invited to present oral argument as amicus curiae in support of the judgment below. Oral argument in this case, presently scheduled for January 18, 1984, is postponed and the case of New York v. Uplinger, No. 82-1724 [certiorari granted, ante, p. 812], is set for oral argument in its stead.