green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Steven Charles Landrum v. State
See Clayton v. State, 652 S.W.2d 950, 956 (Tex.Cr.App.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 719 , 79 L.Ed.2d 181 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Steven Charles Landrum v. State
See Clayton v. State, 652 S.W.2d 950, 956 (Tex.Cr.App 1983), cert. denied , 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 719 , 79 L.Ed.2d 181 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Steven Charles Landrum v. State
See Clayton v. State, 652 S.W.2d 950, 956 (Tex.Cr.App 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 719 , 79 L.Ed.2d 181 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crum v. State
(2×)
See Clayton v. State, 652 S.W.2d 950, 956 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 719 , 79 L.Ed.2d 181 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. United States
See United States v. Hamid, 461 A.2d 1043, 1044 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 718 , 79 L.Ed.2d 180 (1984) (defendant has no constitutional right to counsel for motion to reduce sentence, and inquiry into counsel’s effectiveness in allegedly filing such a motion too late was therefore “an irrelevancy”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian John Tibesar
To challenge for cause, a party must show "actual partiality growing out of the nature and circumstances of [the] particular case[ ]." United States v. Wood, 299 U.S. 123, 149 , 57 S.Ct. 177, 186 , 81 L.Ed. 78 (1936); see Rogers v. Rulo, 712 F.2d 363 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 719 , 79 L.Ed.2d 181 (1984) (court rejected a per se theory of implied bias and required that actual prejudice be shown).
examined
Cited "see"
Teague v. Lane
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Weathersby v. Morris, 708 F. 2d 1493, 1495-1496 (CA9 1983) (supporting petitioner's interpretation of Swain ), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 1046 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re F.G.
See People v. Cooks, 141 Cal.App.3d 224 , 190 Cal.Rptr. 211, 270 (1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 718 , 79 L.Ed.2d 180 (1984); State v. True, 464 A.2d 946, 950 (Me.1983); see also cases cited in N. Sobel, Eyewitness Identification, supra, at 9-12 n. 61.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Fg
See People v. Cooks, 141 Cal.App. 3d 224 , 190 Cal.Rptr. 211, 270 (1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 718 , 79 L.Ed.2d 180 (1984); State v. True, 464 A.2d 946, 950 (Me.1983); see also cases cited in N. Sobel, Eyewitness Identification, supra, at 9-12 n. 61.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dancy v. State
(2×)
See Clayton v. State, 652 S.W.2d 950, 954, 955 (Tex.Cr.App.1983), U.S. cert. den., 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 719 , 79 L.Ed.2d 181 (1984); Brooks v. State, supra, at 797; Ellerbee v. State, 631 S.W.2d 480 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) (opinion on rehearing) and cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oliva v. Hedgpeth
“Moreover, a testifying witness’s out-of-court identification is probative for that purpose and can, by itself, be sufficient evidence of the defendant’s guilt even if the witness does not confirm it in court.” People v. Boyer, 38 Cal.4th at 480 , 42 Cal.Rptr.3d 677 , 133 P.3d 581 (citation omitted). “[T]estimony that a defendant resembles the [perpetrator] [citations], or looks like the same [citations], has been held sufficient.” People v. Jackson, 183 Cal.App.2d 562, 568 , 6 Cal.Rptr. 884 (1960); see also People v. Cooks, 141 Cal.App.3d 224, 278 , 190 Cal.Rptr. 211 (1983), cert.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hines v. District of Columbia Board of Parole
See also United States v. Hamid, 461 A.2d 1043 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 718 , 79 L.Ed.2d 180 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Messer v. State
(2×)
Id., at 554, n. 13 . [See Tibbs v. Florida, 457 U.S. 31 , 102 S.Ct. 2211 , 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); see also Hill v. State, 719 S.W.2d 199 (Tex.Cr.App.1986) (Dissenting Opinion).] Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit denied habeas relief and affirmed the district court The Supreme Court denied certio-rari, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 718 , 79 L.Ed.2d 180 (1984). .
Byers
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-5282.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1984.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.