Hannahville Indian Cmty. v. United States, 105 S. Ct. 101 (SCOTUS 1984).

Hannahville Indian Cmty. v. United States, 105 S. Ct. 101 (SCOTUS 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment Quoted verbatim 1× 31.6 score

“if ... a question requires us to consider legal 689 concepts in the mix of fact and law and to exercise judgment about the values that animate legal principles ... the question should be classified as one of law and reviewed de novo.”

1,323 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 60 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: The Engineers Club of San Francisco v. United States (ca9, 1986-06-06) · Strongest negative: Romesh Japra, M.D., F.A.C.C., Inc. v. Apte (In Re Apte) (bap9, 1995-04-13)

Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

1984 2005 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.

discussed Cited "but see" Romesh Japra, M.D., F.A.C.C., Inc. v. Apte (In Re Apte)

9th Cir. BAP · 1995 · signal: but see · confidence high

But see id. at 1462 (Fernandez, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (stating that “because the legal standard for judging whether reliance is justifiable requires us to determine, by reference to the 'data of practical human experience’ whether an individual's reliance was justified, 'the trial court's findings of fact effectively determine our legal conclusion,’" thus making the issue of justifiable reliance a mixed question of fact and law) (quoting United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1204 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984)). …

examined Cited as authority (quoted) The Engineers Club of San Francisco v. United States

9th Cir. · 1986 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low

if ... a question requires us to consider legal 689 concepts in the mix of fact and law and to exercise judgment about the values that animate legal principles ... the question should be classified as one of law and reviewed de novo.

discussed Cited "see" Denise Green v. City & County of San Francisco

9th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high

See 918 F.2d at 825 (citing United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1206 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (recognizing that the drug trade is often dangerous and involves weapons)).

discussed Cited "see" Liddy v. Lamone

Md. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201-02 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). 15 Accordingly, where the *249 issue is whether a party is precluded by laches from challenging an action of another party, we shall review the trial court’s ultimate determination of the issue de novo, just as we do in similar circumstances. 16 Thus, we hold that the Circuit Court erred in not invoking the doctrine of laches as a bar to the appellant’s untimely claim when it placed the determination of *250 a candidate’s eligibility ahead of the urgency…

cited Cited "see" Graf v. Gonzales

9th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high

See Fallini v. Hodel, 783 F.2d 1343, 1345 (9th Cir.1986) citing United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

discussed Cited "see" State v. Ball (2×)

S.D. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202-04 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

discussed Cited "see" State v. Williams

La. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Espinoza

E.D. Wis. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1206 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984); United States v. Davis, 617 F.2d 677, 695 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 967 , 100 S.Ct. 1659 , 64 L.Ed.2d 244 (1980) (no violation of § 3109 where police knocked, announced themselves, and entered after 15 to 30 seconds passed without response; no exigent circumstances raised).

cited Cited "see" United States of America, (97-6308/6309) v. David Tex Hill, (97-6051/6286)

6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

discussed Cited "see" Whaley v. Thompson

D. Or. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1204 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984); United States v. Spillone, 879 F.2d 514, 520 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 878 , 111 S.Ct. 210 , 112 L.Ed.2d 170 (1990).

cited Cited "see" ca1 1996

1st Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Christopher Fredrick Vonwillie, AKA Christopher Fred Vonwillie

9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1206 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (mild exigency is sufficient to justify simultaneous knock/announce and entry if entry does not require physical destruction of property), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984); United States v. Whitney, 633 F.2d 902, 909 (9th Cir.1980) (“only a mild indication of exigency is required to excuse noncompliance with the ‘refusal of admittance’ requirement of section 3109”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1004 , 101 S.Ct. 1717 , 68 L.Ed.2d 208 (1981).

discussed Cited "see" Gloria Franklin and Johnny Curry v. Derrick Foxworth (2×)

9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Daniel James Fowlie (2×)

9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Viken Yacoubian

9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See generally United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201-04 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

discussed Cited "see" ca9 1994

9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1200 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (mixed questions are those "in which the historical facts are ... established, the rule of law is undisputed, and the issue is whether the facts satisfy the relevant statutory ... standard") (internal quotation omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

discussed Cited "see" Western Recreational Vehicles, Inc. v. Swift Adhesives, Inc.

9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1200 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (mixed questions are those “in which the historical facts are ... established, the rule of law is undisputed, and the issue is whether the facts satisfy the relevant statutory ... standard”) (internal quotation omitted), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

cited Cited "see" United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Alvin Barker

9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

cited Cited "see" ca9 1993

9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

cited Cited "see" Baker v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

discussed Cited "see" Mark v. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Edward J. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Ronald J. Watkins (2×)

9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F .2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). 10 Because we answer both these threshold legal questions in the affirmative and hold that the qualified privilege applies in this case, we must decide a third question: Have the plaintiffs demonstrated a need for Watkins' information that is sufficient to overcome the interests favoring non-disclosure?

cited Cited "see" United States v. Paul F. Soares

9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

cited Cited "see" ca9 1993

9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Joseph T. Brady

9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en bane), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Trigg

9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

cited Cited "see" Estate of Barbara L. Reynolds v. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor

9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Diego Toro Adriana Toro, and Ralph T. Powell, Maria L. Powell, Sureties, Real Parties in Interest