green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
12.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Leah Perry Macia
this court is the final arbiter of legal ethics problems and must make the ultimate decisions about public reprimands, suspensions or annulments of attorneys' licenses to practice law.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mick v. Ravenswood Aluminum Corp.
despite the presence of individual factual questions, the commonality criterion of rule 23(a) is satisfied by the common questions of law presented.
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Johnson & Johnson
See Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 216-217 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Bickford v. Denmark Technical College
See Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 209 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Woodard v. Online Information Services
See Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 216-217 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Nichols v. Comcast Cablevision of Maryland
See Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 209 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Black v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.
See Holsey v. Armour & Company, 743 F.2d 199 , 217 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985) (stating “Despite the presence of individual factual questions, the commonality criterion of rule 23(a) is satisfied by the common questions of law presented.”) Nonetheless, the Court of Appeals has suggested that “[cjlass certification is only proper when a determinative critical issue overshadows all other issues.” Stott v. Haworth, 916 F.2d 134, 145 (4th Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Locke v. North Gateway Restaurant, Inc.
Store, supra, at 160; see, Goldberg v Sitomer, Sito mer & Porges, 97 AD2d 114 , affd 63 NY2d 831 , cert denied 470 US 1028 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Franklin v. Barry
See Holsey v. Armour Co., 743 F.2d 199, 217 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985); see also NAACP v. Georgia, 99 F.R.D. 16, 25 (S.D.Ga.1983) (when broad discrimination policies and practices constitute the grava-' men of a class suit, common questions of law and fact are necessarily presented).
cited
Cited "see"
Demby v. English
See Smith v. Russell, 456 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1984) (holding a police officer is a public official), cert. den., 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1392 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lewis
Johnson v. State, 531 S.W.2d 558, 559 (Tenn.1975); see State v. Atkins, 681 S.W.2d 571, 577 (Tenn.Crim.App.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Simone v. Worcester County
See Singer v. Wadman, 745 F.2d 606, 608 (10th ___ ______ ______ Cir. 1984) (holding that judge's former partnership with a -14- lawyer for one of the defendants did not require disqualification), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 (1985). _____ ______ Nor does the Simones' allegation that the Bankruptcy Judge's former law firm represented WCIS require recusal. "[A] charge of partiality must be supported by a factual basis." Allied Signal, 891 F.2d at 970 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Simone v. Worcester County
See Singer v. Wadman, 745 F.2d 606, 608 (10th Cir. 1984) (holding that judge's former partnership with a lawyer for one of the defendants did not require disqualification), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 (1985). 36 Nor does the Simones' allegation that the Bankruptcy Judge's former law firm represented WCIS require recusal. "[A] charge of partiality must be supported by a factual basis." Allied Signal, 891 F.2d at 970 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilder v. Southeastern Public Service Authority
See Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 214 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985) (manager’s statement to employee that blacks are not hired as sales managers constitutes direct evidence of discrimination).
cited
Cited "see"
House v. Armour of America, Inc.
See Conti v. Ford Motor Co., 743 F.2d 195, 197 (3d Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Suren Mosesian, United States of America v. Lawrence Clay Rocker
See Singer v. Wadman, 745 F.2d 606, 608 (10th Cir.1984) (district judge's former partnership with defendant's lawyer does not require recusal), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 (1985); National Auto Brokers v. General Motors Corp., 572 F.2d 953 , 958 (2d Cir.1978) (affirming denial of recusal motion where district judge had been previously associated with firm now representing defendant), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1072 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Westphal v. Waukesha Dresser/Waukesha Engine Division
(2×)
See Herman v. Nat’l Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 606 (7th Cir.1984) (citing Dickerson v. Deluxe Check Printers, Inc., 703 F.2d 276, 283 (8th Cir.1983)), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. El-Gabrowny
See Singer v. Wadman, 745 F.2d 606, 608 (10th Cir.1984) (motion to recuse Mormon judge on ground lawsuit involved “theocratic power structure of Utah”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985); State of Idaho v. Freeman, 507 F.Supp. 706, 729-33 (D.Idaho 1981) (motion to recuse Mormon judge on ground his former office in church predisposed him against Equal Rights Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. Evans
See Singer v. Wadman, 595 F.Supp. 188, 288 (C.D.Utah 1982), aff'd 745 F.2d 606 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985) (school superintendent entitled to qualified immunity for initiating prosecution under compulsory attendance law); Mazanec v. North Judson —San Pierre School Corp., 614 F.Supp. 1152, 1158-59 (D.C.Ind.1985), aff'd, 798 F.2d 230 (7th Cir.1986) (school superintendent in charge of locating school age children which might not be complying with mandatory school attendance was immune for reporting violation to prosecuting authorities wh…
cited
Cited "see"
Central Wesleyan College v. W.R. Grace & Co.
See Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 216-217 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Salt Lake Community Action Program, Inc. v. Sullivan
See East Arkansas Legal Services v. Legal Services Corp., 742 F.2d 1472, 1477-78 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985). 2 Here, HHS has not complied with the statute or HHS’s own regulations.
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1992
See West Michigan Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 735 F.2d 601 , 604-07 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1392 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985) 3 For instance, when asked how he expected his relationship with his partners to work, Dr. Stamps responded, "Well, I am afraid to answer that question because I know what is expected of me by law....
cited
Cited "see"
Bechtel v. Federal Communications Commission
See West Michigan Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 735 F.2d 601 , 604-07 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1392 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Herber v. Boatmen's Bank of Tennessee
(2×)
See Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Fort Stanton Hospital & Training School
See Singer v. Wadman, 745 F.2d 606, 608 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985); United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1094 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 , 104 S.Ct. 729 , 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1990
See Conti v. Ford Motor Co., 743 F.2d 195, 198 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985) and Morena v. South Hills Health System, 501 Pa. 634 , 462 A.2d 680 (1983). 18 What must be shown in order to establish the requisite causal connection between a plaintiff's asbestos-related injury and the defendant's asbestos-containing product is central to resolution of this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Weiss v. Parker Hannifan Corp.
Filing of a civil rights complaint, intending to file a civil rights complaint, and complaining about discrimination to corporate superiors are acts protected under Title VII. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a); see Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 211 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985); Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation, etc., 545 F.2d 222, 231 (1st Cir.1976); Gifford v. Atchison, T. & S.F.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.
See Conti v. Ford Motor Co., 743 F.2d 195, 198 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985) and Morena v. South Hills Health System, 501 Pa. 634 , 462 A.2d 680 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation Edgar L. Moore
(2×)
Accord, Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 209 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shurberg Broadcasting of Hartford, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Astroline Communications Co., Intervenor
(2×)
See West Michigan Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 735 F.2d 601 , 606 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. at 1392, 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985). 59 Shurberg's situation is also analogous to the nonminority employees in Wygant.
cited
Cited "see"
Ramsbottom v. Ramsbottom
See Bell v. Bell, 393 Mass. 20 , 468 N.E.2d 859 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S. Ct. 1392 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Glass v. Pfeffer
See Singer v. Wadman, 745 F.2d 606, 608 (10th Cir.1984) (timeliness is factor in evaluating §§ 144 and 455 motions), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Glass v. Pfeffer
See Singer v. Wadman, 745 F.2d 606, 608 (10th Cir.1984) (timeliness is factor in evaluating Secs. 144 and 455 motions), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985)
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorothy Willner v. University of Kansas
See Singer v. Wadman, 745 F.2d 606, 608 (10th Cir.1984) (motion to recuse under both 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455(a) was untimely) cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985); see also Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Homestake Mining Co., 722 F.2d 1407, 1414 (8th Cir.1983) (section 455(a) has a timeliness requirement); United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1094 (11th Cir.1983) (same), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 , 104 S.Ct. 729 , 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984); Chitimacha Tribe v. Harry L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy Janowiak v. The Corporate City of South Bend
(2×)
Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); see Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
National Clearinghouse for Legal Services, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp.
See East Arkansas Legal Services v. Legal Services Corporation, 742 F.2d 1472 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1987
See Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 207 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985). 30 The majority opinion is an excellent argument for the plaintiff on the facts, but I would accept the finding of the district court as being not clearly erroneous. * See 823 F.2d 60 1 Chesapeake Developmental Unit, Inc., in combination with Chesapeake Center, Inc. and Chesapeake Group Homes, Inc., comprise an integrated private social service agency in the State of Maryland 2 A P.P.D. is a skin test for tuberculosis.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon
See Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Authority, 745 F.2d 166, 174-75 (2d Cir.1984) (mere exchange of price information is not itself violative of the antitrust laws), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Beatty v. Chesapeake Center, Inc.
See Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199, 207 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.
See Frederick Meiswenkel, Inc. v. Laborer’s Union Local 261, 744 F.2d 1374 , 1377 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1394 , 84 L.Ed.2d 783 (1985) (exclusion of jurisdictional disputes from arbitration clear); Roadway Express, Inc. v. Teamsters Local 515, 642 F.Supp. 116, 119 (N.D.Ga.1986) (exclusion of representation disputes clear); Allied Oil Workers Union v. Ethyl Corp., 602 F.Supp. 555, 559 (M.D.La.1984) (exemption of supervisors from arbitration procedure clear); United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. Backman Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 598 F.Supp. 212, 219 (S.D…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.
See Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Authority, 745 F.2d 166, 174-75 (2d Cir. 1984) (mere exchange of price information is not itself violative of the antitrust laws), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Brudne v. Amalgamated Trust & Savings Bank
See Herman v. NBC, 744 F.2d 604, 606 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
James U. Steele v. Federal Communications Commission, Dale Bell, Intervenor
(2×)
See West Michigan Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 735 F.2d 601 , 604-06 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1392 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Madison v. Frazier
(2×)
The Court has read the parties’ briefs and the materials submitted in support thereof. *1060 STANDARD OF REVIEW A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cer…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brady-Lunny v. Massey
(2×)
STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indiana Insurance v. Pana Community Unit School District No. 8
(2×)
STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indiana Ins. Co. v. PANA COMM. UNIT SCH. DIST. 8
(2×)
STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stone v. Sangamon County Sheriff's Department
(2×)
For the reasons that follow, the Court will not address this latter contention.) STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilhite v. Illinois Power Co.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must .be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGuire v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, ILL.
(2×)
STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
National Broadcasting Co., Inc.
v.
Herman and Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.
v.
Herman and Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.
No. 84-984; No. 84-1133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: West Virginia Supreme Court (1) · S.D. West Virginia (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.