green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
13.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Alex Simmons
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 765 (2d Cir.1984) (Newman, J., concurring) (expert's testimony that observed events constituted a narcotics sale was of doubtful value), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Simmons
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 765 (2d Cir.1984) (Newman, J., concurring) (expert’s testimony that observed events constituted a narcotics sale was of doubtful value), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Speedco, Incorporated v. Donald Estes
See Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Co., 352 F.2d 443, 446 , 147 USPQ 347, 348-49 (8th Cir.1965); but see Weinar v. Rollform Inc., 744 F.2d 797, 806-07 , 223 USPQ 369, 375 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1844 , 85 L.Ed.2d 143 (1985).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Garrett Brock Trapnell v. George Ralston J.A. O'Brien Joseph Petrowkey and A.W. Bayles
But see Myers v. Morris, 810 F.2d 1437, 1453 (8th Cir.1987) concluding that “more than the mere recitation of an improper state of mind such as malice, bad faith, retaliatory motive or conspiracy is required to defeat qualified immunity for conduct which, absent that state of mind, would be constitutionally acceptable or protected by immunity.” Accord Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 29 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985): Harlow focused on the need to enable courts to dismiss “insubstantial” lawsuits before discovery and trial, and it adju…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Dennis
we have repeatedly upheld the use of expert testimony by government agents to describe the . . . operating methods of narcotics dealers
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Benjamin Barry Kramer, Randy Thomas Lanier, Eugene Albert Fischer, and Kay Dee Bell, Jr.
(2×)
in order to support a 848 charge, the government is not required to plead in any form, much less obtain convictions on, any of the eligible predicate offenses, but may instead simply prove at trial the continuing series of offenses.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Sidney Muskovsky and Michael Posner
not even the plain error doctrine permits reversal on the ground that the trial court granted a defendant's request to charge.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Conde
See generally United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 752 (2d 15 Cir. 1984) (not even the plain error doctrine allowed reversal for an "error" that the 16 appellant "invited" (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 17 (1985). - 25 - 1 CONCLUSION 2 We have considered all of Conde's contentions on this appeal and have 3 found them to be without merit.
cited
Cited "see"
Kinnison v. City of San Antonio
See Estate of Ross, 672 S.W.2d 315, 317 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1984, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. denied 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1844 , 85 L.Ed.2d 143 .
discussed
Cited "see"
William J. Federer v. Richard A. Gephardt, Individually Joyce A. Aboussie, Individually James A. Larrew, Individually and John Does
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 19-20 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985), overruled in part on other grounds, Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163 , 113 S.Ct. 1160 , 122 L.Ed.2d 517 *759 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
FTC v. Pmcs, Inc.
See *191 Sterling Drug, Inc. v. FTC, 741 F.2d 1146, 1154 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 143 (1985); Katharine Gibbs School (Inc.) v. FTC, 612 F.2d 658, 665 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. P.M.C.S., Inc.
See Sterling Drug, Inc. v. FTC, 741 F.2d 1146, 1154 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 143 (1985); Katharine Gibbs School (Inc.) v. FTC, 612 F.2d 658, 665 (2d Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Miller
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 748-52 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Miller
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 748-52 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Zucker v. Sasaki
See Dahlberg v. Becker, 748 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1845 , 85 L.Ed.2d 144 (1985). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Doe v. United States
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 65 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, Brennan v. Hobson, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Nch, Inc., a Corporation, Dba National Clearing House Robbin McLaurin James Hart
See Sterling Drug, Inc. v. FTC, 741 F.2d 1146, 1154 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wainsworth Marcellus Hall
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 747 (2d Cir.1984) (citing cases), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Bell Sports, Inc.
See Dahlberg v. Becker, 748 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir. 1984), cert. denied 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1845 , 85 L.Ed.2d 144 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Romanella v. Hayward
See Dahlberg v. Becker, 748 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1845 , 85 L.Ed.2d 144 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
D'ANGELO v. City of New York
See Heimbach v. Chu, 744 F.2d 11 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 141 (1985); Saylor v. Lindsley, 391 F.2d 965, 968 (2d Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diamond v. Davis
(2×)
See Hobson v. Wilson, 237 U.S.App.D.C. 219 , 256 n. 113, 737 F.2d 1 , 37 n. 113 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Supermarket Of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 , 32-35 & n. 102 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 , 32-35 & n. 102 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mittleman v. United States Department of the Treasury
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 65-66 (D.C.Cir.1984) (directing the district court first to consider whether plaintiff was entitled to' relief under the Privacy Act, and, if the Act did not provide relief, directing consideration of whether relief was available under the Constitution), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct, 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985); see also Dickson v. Office of Personnel Management, 828 F.2d 32, 41 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (indicating that this Circuit has not resolved the issue of whether the Privacy Act defines the scope of remedies available under *468 the Constitution).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jacob Washington, Robert Hickman, and Jerome Washington, Frank Salas, Marlon Douglas, Stephen Collins, and Percy Culcleasure
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733 , 758-60 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985); United States v. Dunloy, 584 F.2d 6, 10-11 (2d Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Antonious v. Muhammad
See Heimbach v. Chu, 744 F.2d 11, 14 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 141 (1985) (citation omitted); Hodes, 520 N.Y.S.2d at 937-38 , 515 N.E.2d 612 .
cited
Cited "see"
Velaire v. City of Schenectady, NY
See Doe v. Smith, 704 F.Supp. 1177, 1189 (S.D.N.Y.1988); See generally Dahlberg v. Becker, 748 F.2d 85, 92-93 (2d Cir.1984) cert. den. 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1845 , 85 L.Ed.2d 144 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Morales
Search Warrant Affidavit, ¶ 13; see United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 758 (2d Cir.1984) (in issuing search warrant, magistrate is entitled to consider and credit specialized knowledge of expert affiant regarding common tools used by narcotics traffickers), cer t. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985). 5 The foregoing discussion also reveals the inadequacy of defendant Santos’ contention that the Search Warrant Affidavit is defective because it fails to mention that Mr. Santos was engaged in the distribution of narcotics from the apartment.
cited
Cited "see"
James P. Sigler v. George W. Twyford Thomas M. Tyack Jay Sanford
See Dahlberg v. Becker, 748 F.2d 85, 93 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 (1985); cf. Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 321 (1981). 6 Accordingly, the district court's order is affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Foy v. United States
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985) (citing Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 469 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Locascio, and John Gotti
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 761 (2d Cir.1984) (pointing out that the defendants were free to expose the weaknesses in the prose cution’s widespread use of expert testimony through cross examination), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 35 (D.C.Cir.1984) (holding that "[t]he doctrine of fraudulent concealment does not come into play, whatever the lengths to which a defendant has gone to conceal the wrongs, if a plaintiff is on notice of the claim he now brings"), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Meridian Towers Apartments, Inc.
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 , 33-34 & n. 102 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell R. George, AKA Rusty, and Pamela A. Johnson-Sherman, Francis R. Lajoice
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 758 (2d Cir.1984) (possession with intent to distribute narcotic controlled substances), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985); Mankani, 738 F.2d at 546 (importation and distribution of hashish); United States v. Dunloy, 584 F.2d 6, 8 (2d Cir.1978) (possession with intent to distribute narcotics); United States v. Scharfman, 448 F.2d 1352 , 1353 n. 1 (2d Cir.1971) (theft of fur coats), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 919 , 92 S.Ct. 944 , 30 L.Ed.2d 789 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles 2x Cox v. District of Columbia
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 63 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Amoco Oil Co.
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 34-35 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Bank of New York v. Sasson
See Dahlberg v. Becker, 748 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1845 , 85 L.Ed.2d 144 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronnie Bryser, Gerald Degerolamo, Vincent Degerolamo
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 762 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thanh Vong Hoai v. Thanh Van Vo
See 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3) (1988). 8 The scope of section 1985(3) is limited, however, by the condition that such conspiracies be “motivated by some class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus.” See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 14 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc.
See Weinar v. Rollform, 744 F.2d 797 , 806-07 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1844 , 85 L.Ed.2d 143 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 761 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985) (trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether or not to allow narrative testimony).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Doe v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, John Doe v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
(2×)
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 64 (D.C.Cir.1984) ("expungement ... is, in proper circumstances, a permissible remedy for an agency's violation of the Privacy Act"), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Perrone, Ramon Emilio Gomez and Israel Perez, Antonio Perrone and Ramon Emilio Gomez
(2×)
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 753 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985) (“surreptitious fashion” in which bag was transferred from car is a factor supporting inference of defendant’s involvement in narcotics transaction).
cited
Cited "see"
Walsh v. Ward
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 , 30 n. 87 (D.C.Cir.1984) (citing cases), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. D.C. Public Defender Service
See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 30-31 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Coke v. Coke
See In the Estate of Ross, 672 S.W.2d 315, 318 (Tex.App.—Eastland 1984, writ ref d n.r.e.), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1844 , 85 L.Ed.2d 143 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Riley, Norman Burnett, Jeffrey Sizemore, Vincent Mazza
(2×)
See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 759-60 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985); see also Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. at 480-81 , 96 S.Ct. at 2748-49 .
cited
Cited "see"
Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)
See Dahlberg v. Becker, 748 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1845 , 85 L.Ed.2d 144 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Studifin v. New York City Police Department-License Division-Firearms Control Section
See Dahlberg v. Becker, 748 F.2d 85 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1845 , 85 L.Ed.2d 144 (1985).
Heimbach, County Executive of Orange County
v.
Chu, Commissioner of New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
v.
Chu, Commissioner of New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
No. 84-944.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (3) · Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.