green
Positive treatment
8.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
See United States v. Macklin , 902 F.2d 1320 , 1330 (8th Cir. 1990) ("[T]o have a legitimate expectation of privacy by way of a possessory interest, defendant must have possession of the vehicle and the keys."), citing United States v. Rose , 731 F.2d 1337 , 1343 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rashad Russell
See United States v. Macklin, 902 F.2d 1320, 1330 (8th Cir. 1990) (“[T]o have a legitimate expectation of privacy by way of a possessory interest, defendant must have possession of the vehicle and the keys.”), citing United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343 (8th Cir.), cert denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984). [[Image here]] The judgment is affirmed. 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dickey
See [United States v.] Rose, 731 F.2d [1337,] 1342 [ (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984) ].
cited
Cited "see"
Guy C. Barnes v. Gary Grimes
See Chapman v. Musich, 726 F.2d 405, 407 (8th Cir.) (in § 1983 action for failure to investigate, defendant's actions must be intentional), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guy C. Barnes v. Gary Grimes Jim Rush
See Chapman v. Musich, 726 F.2d 405, 407 (8th Cir.) (in § 1983 action for failure to investigate, defendant's actions must be intentional), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 (1984). 6 The judgment is affirmed. 1 The Honorable Beverly R.
cited
Cited "see"
Bixby Ranch Co. v. United States
See United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 300-01 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Cash v. United States
See Sherer v. United States, 470 A.2d 732 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul W. Stuart
See Paulson v. Black, 728 F.2d 1164, 1167 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Lands Legal Foundation v. U.S. Forest Service
See Impro Prods., Inc. v. Block, 722 F.2d 845, 850 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elliott v. United States
See Sherer v. United States, 470 A.2d 732, 738 (D.C.1983), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984) (right to cross-examine on prior acts of perjury contingent on showing that perjury actually took place).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Hannigan
See Paulson v. Black, 728 F.2d 1164, 1167 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984); Sena v. Romero, 617 F.2d 579, 581 (10th Cir.1980); Freeman v. Page, 443 F.2d 493, 497 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1001 , 92 S.Ct. 569 , 30 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary Cranford v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Paulson v. Black, 728 F.2d 1164, 1167 (8th Cir.) (Constitution does not require that defendant’s statements furnish factual basis for guilty plea), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard
Although no court has clearly resolved this issue regarding social security payments direct deposited into the account of a proper social security recipient, at least one court has concluded that, regarding federal funds: [M]oney remains “money ... of the United States” within the meaning of § 641 even after being deposited in the bank account of the grantee, see United States v. Largo, 775 F.2d 1099, 1101 (10th Cir.1985) (per curiam), cert. denied, [474] U.S. [1105], 106 S.Ct. 891 , 88 L.Ed.2d 925 (1986), and even if commingled with non-federal funds, see United States v. Von Stephens, 7…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jamison v. United States
See Sherer v. United States, 470 A.2d 732, 738 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984); Jones, supra, 548 A.2d at 39 . 11 Following this line of questioning, Kenley moved for severance.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keller
See United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 305 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984); United States v. Di Fonzo, 603 F.2d 1260, 1266 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1018 , 100 S.Ct. 672 , 62 L.Ed.2d 648 (1980); United States v. Beer, 518 F.2d 168, 170-71 (5th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert M. Burton, Peter Balogun
See United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 303 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
National City Bank v. Imbody (In Re Imbody)
See, United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 303 (7th Cir.1984), cert. den. 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984); 26 Am.Jur.2d Embezzlement § 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sweat v. United States
See Sherer v. United States, 470 A.2d 732, 740 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984): The rule barring the introduction of prior consistent statements is designed to prevent the jury from learning that a witness has given the same account out of court that he or she gave on the stand.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Hayle v. United States
Federal grant money remains “money ... of the United States” within the meaning of § 641 even after being deposited in the” bank account of the grantee, see United States v. Largo, 775 F.2d 1099, 1101 (10th Cir.1985) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 891 , 88 L.Ed.2d 925 (1986), and even if commingled with non-federal funds, see United States v. Von Stephens, 774 F.2d 1411, 1413 (9th Cir. 1985) (per curiam); United States v. Gibbs, 704 F.2d 464, 466 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam); United States v. Mitchell, 625 F.2d 158, 160-61 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 984 , 101 S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sharon Lanelle Martinez
See United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984); United States v. Griffin, 729 F.2d 475 , 483 n. 11 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984). 20 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Woolbright
See United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1342 (8th Cir.), cert. den., 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sequoia Forestkeeper v. Tidwell
This position in Summers regarding standing, in addition to this NWF decision regarding ripeness, supports application of the following rule of accrual in the instant action: “A cause of action against an administrative agency ‘first accrues’ within the meaning of § 2401(a), as soon as (but not before) the person challenging the agency can institute and maintain a suit in court.” Spannaus v. United States, 824 F.2d 52, 56 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States, 386 U.S. 503, 510-11 , 87 S.Ct. 1177 , 18 L.Ed.2d 256 (1967)); see also, Impro Prods., Inc. v. Block, 7…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeter
(2×)
See United States v. Garcia, 897 F.2d 1413, 1418 (7th Cir.1990) (where defendant claimed to have borrowed truck under vague arrangement, he had standing given that government failed to disprove that the truck “was not being used with the permission of the owner”); United States v. Miller, 821 F.2d 546, 548-49 (11th Cir.1987) (defendant had standing to challenge search of car borrowed from a friend); United States v. Portillo, 633 F.2d 1313, 1317 (9th Cir.1980) (same), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1043 , 101 S.Ct. 1763 , 68 L.Ed.2d 241 (1981); see also United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343 (…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. Bonanno
See, e.g., Sherer v. United States, 470 A.2d 732, 738 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Teddy Wayne Fowler v. Ron Wallace, and Tulsa County Public Defenders Office, Staff of Public Defenders Office
See Herrera v. Harkins, 949 F.2d 1096, 1097 (10th Cir.1991) (stating habeas corpus is appropriate remedy for prisoners attacking the validity of the fact or length of their confinement); see also Chapman v. Musich, 726 F.2d 405 , 408 n. 18 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 (1984)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Rene Ponce
(2×)
This Court has repeatedly held that when “a person has borrowed an automobile from another, with the other’s consent, the borrower becomes a lawful possessor of the vehicle and thus has standing to challenge its search.” United States v. Kye Soo Lee, 898 F.2d 1034, 1038 (5th Cir.1990) (citing United States v. Martinez, 808 F.2d 1050, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 1962 , 95 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987); see also United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343 (5th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ponce
This Court has repeatedly held that when "a person has borrowed an automobile from another, with the other's consent, the borrower becomes a lawful possessor of the vehicle and thus has standing to challenge its search." United States v. Kye Soo Lee, 898 F.2d 1034, 1038 (5th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Martinez, 808 F.2d 1050, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1032 (1987); see also United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343 (5th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patricia Ann Hemphill v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
(2×)
See, e.g., Woodward & Lothrop v. Hillary, 598 A.2d 1142, 1150 (D.C.1991) (“Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, as under the [D.C.] rule of Sherer [v. United States, 470 A.2d 732, 738 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984) ], a witness may be impeached with [prior] acts ... if those acts are ‘clearly probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness.’ Fed.R.Evid. 608(b) (1989).”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Carter v. United States
See, e.g., Sherer v. United States, 470 A.2d 732, 738 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Urabazo v. United States
"The plaintiff's failure to sue within the period of limitations is not simply a waivable defense; it deprives the court of jurisdiction to entertain the action." Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe v. United States, 895 F.2d at 592 ; see also Vincent Murphy Chevrolet Co. v. United States, 766 F.2d 449, 452 (10th Cir.1985). 8 Although the government should have brought its challenge to the court's subject matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) rather than Rule 56, "[t]his procedural obstacle is inconsequential ... because we review a district court's decision under both rules de novo." Zumw…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ramon Rubio-Rivera
United States v. Garcia, 897 F.2d 1413, 1418 (7th Cir.1990) (where defendant claimed to have borrowed truck under vague arrangement, he had standing given that government failed to disprove that the truck “was not being used with the permission of the owner”); United States v. Miller, 821 F.2d 546, 548-49 (11th Cir.1987) (defendant had standing to challenge search of car borrowed from a friend); United States v. Portillo, 633 F.2d 1313, 1317 (9th Cir.1980) (same), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1043 , 101 S.Ct. 1763 , 1764, 68 L.Ed.2d 241 (1981); see also United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Irick v. United States
(2×)
See Springer v. United States, 388 A.2d 846, 855 (D.C. 1978); see also Sherer v. United States, 470 A.2d 732, 736 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Roy Horton Tomato Co. v. Home Insurance
See, e.g., Chapman v. Musich, 726 F.2d 405, 408 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 262 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Dale Winsor
See, e.g., United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1342 (8th Cir.) (yellow car driven by black female), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984); Luckett v. State, 259 Ind. 174 , 284 N.E.2d 738, 741-42 (1972) (police “did not have probable cause to stop every green automobile with an 82J license prefix” in a given area, but they did have reasonable suspicion).
Gary
v.
California
v.
California
No. 83-6798.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1984.
Published
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.