green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.0 score
“the public interest in television access to the courtroom does not now lie within the first amendment.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca8 1987
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1038-39 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982); but see United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1360-61 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 20 66 Any error involved in charging 10(a) and 10(b) as separate predicate acts is harmless as to Kragness because he was convicted on Count XI, which charged a substantive offense identical to Count II's predicate act 10(d).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Kragness
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1038-39 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982); but see United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1360-61 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 20 Any error involved in charging 10(a) and 10(b) as separate predicate acts is harmless as to Kragness because he was convicted on Count XI, which charged a substantive offense identical to Count II's predicate act 10(d).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Edwin W. Edwards v. Russell E. Wise, Intervenor-Appellant
the public interest in television access to the courtroom does not now lie within the first amendment.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Ruben R.
In Globe Newspaper Co. v Superior Ct. (supra, at 607), the United States Supreme Court recognized two interests favoring closure, the protection of minor victims of sex crimes from further trauma and embarrassment, and the encouragement of those victims to come forward and testify truthfully and credibly.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lenarz
(2×)
See United States v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251, 257 (3d Cir. 1984) (sixth amendment violation follows from finding of prejudice), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S. Ct. 3477 , 87 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Szalma
(2×)
See United States v Maker, 751 F2d 614, 622 (CA 3, 1984), cert den 472 US 1017 (1985) (holding that a judicial ruling is an acquittal “only when, in terminating the proceeding, the trial court actually resolves in favor of the defendant a factual element necessary for a 10 criminal conviction.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre N. Moore, United States of America v. Larry Jones
See United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre N. Moore
See United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1240 (8th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Santa Fe Independent School District
(2×)
See Westmoreland v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir.1984) (“[W]e agree with the Third Circuit ... that the First Amendment does secure to the public and to the press a right of access to civil proceédings in accordance with the dicta of the Justices in Richmond Newspapers. . .”), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3478 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985); In re Continental Ill.
discussed
Cited "see"
Poulton v. State
See United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985) and United States v. Caldwell, 954 F.2d 496, 500 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 819 , 113 S.Ct. 65 , 121 L.Ed.2d 32 (1992). 3 In the present case, defense counsel moved for the exclusion of the two statements during a motion in limine hearing.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lin Lyn Trading, Ltd.
See U.S. v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251, 254 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); U.S. v. Levy, 577 F.2d 200 , 210 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Shillinger v. Haworth
See United States v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251, 254 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Levy, 577 F.2d 200, 210 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Shillinger v. Haworth
See United States v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251, 254 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Levy, 577 F.2d 200, 210 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Christopher Fontenot
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1349 (11th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 & 1021, 105 S.Ct. 3477 & 3488, 87 L.Ed.2d 613 , 622 (1985). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Noble C. Beasley, Andre Bruce White, Stephanie Nodd, Richard Stanberry
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1354 (11th Cir.1984) ("prosecutorial appeals for the jury to act as the conscience of the community’ are not impermissible, unless calculated to inflame”), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); see also United States v. Solivan, 937 F.2d 1146, 1153 (6th Cir.1991) ("defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial was violated because the appeal to the community conscience in the context of the War on Drugs prejudicially impacted on her"). 25 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis Smentek v. United States
See United States v. Ambrose, 740 F.2d 505 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 (1985). 3 After resentencing, Smentek filed two motions to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glen Butz Danner L. Boone
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1346-47 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. McNulty, 729 F.2d 1243, 1264-65 (10th Cir.1983) (en banc); United States v. Nelligan, 573 F.2d 251, 254 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Marion, 535 F.2d 697, 702 (2d Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vaden Lee Williams
See Peretz v. United States, 111 S. Ct. 2661, 2669 (1991) (citing United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335 (11th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 (1985)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Snell v. Lockhart
See generally, United States v. Ellison, 793 F.2d 942 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 937 , 107 S.Ct. 415 , 93 L.Ed.2d 366 (1986) and United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1992
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1365 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); cf. Peretz v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2661, 2669 , 115 L.Ed.2d 808 (1991) (stating that the basic rights of criminal defendants are waivable) 3 Under Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), "[t]he applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whethe…
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1992
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1359 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 (1985). 17 There was, however, ample evidence to find Haney guilty of conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt, including the testimony of four government witnesses.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harris
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1365 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); cf. Peretz v. United States, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2661, 2669 , 115 L.Ed.2d 808 (1991) (stating that the basic rights of criminal defendants are waivable). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Floyd Sanders, III v. Don English, Curtis McCoy Ed Perry, and the City of Mansfield
See Thomas v. Sams, 734 F.2d 185, 191 (5th Cir.) (defendant’s malicious conduct constituted improper arrest), amended, 741 F.2d 783 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 612 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hustwit
McCluskey, 6 U.S.C.M.A. at 551 n. 1, 20 C.M.R. at 267 n. 1; see United States v. Costanzo, 625 F.2d 465 (3d Cir. 1980) cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 1 That an at tomey violates his instructions to limit the scope of his representation and may be disciplined for such violation does not affect the validity of the attorney-client relationship and the confidential nature of any disclosures arising therefrom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jennings v. Emry
See United States v. Ambrose, 740 F.2d 505, 512 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985); United States v. Lee Stoller Enter., Inc., 652 F.2d 1313 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed.2d 615 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jennings v. Emry
See United States v. Ambrose, 740 F.2d 505, 512 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985); United States v. Lee Stoller Enter., Inc., 652 F.2d 1313 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed.2d 615 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Roman Young, Zed Myers Bennett, Steven Alan Carver
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Delgado, Dagoberto Silva, Henry Escobar
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1359 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George M. Khoury
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1344 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 3477, 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Prigge
See United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985) (failure to give Miranda rights to defendants prior to their initial responses to questions of law enforcement officers was not plain error).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric John Thompson, United States of America v. Tammy Ann Leavoy
(2×)
FED.R.EVID. 103; see U.S. v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231 , 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3478 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); U.S. v. Vitale, 728 F.2d 1090, 1092 (8th Cir.1984); U.S. v. Wagoner, 713 F.2d 1371, 1376 (8th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Building Material & Dump Truck Drivers, Local 420 v. Traweek
See NLRB v. Carpenters Local Union 35, 739 F.2d 479 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); Adams-Lundy v. Association of Professional Flight Attendants, 792 F.2d 1368, 1372 (5th Cir.1986); Lux v. Blackman, 546 F.2d 713 (7th Cir.1976) (union officers may be summarily removed regardless of the nonregu-larity of removal without violation of § 411).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1989
See NLRB v. Carpenters Local Union 35, 739 F.2d 479 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); Adams-Lundy v. Association of Professional Flight Attendants, 792 F.2d 1368, 1372 (5th Cir.1986); Lux v. Blackman, 546 F.2d 713 (7th Cir.1976) (union officers may be summarily removed regardless of the nonregularity of removal without violation of Sec. 411). 40 For instance, Sec. 411 was not violated by the secret executive board meeting to which Traweek and McFadden were not invited because it did not affect their membership rights.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Feldman
See United States v. Ambrose, 740 F.2d 505, 512 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baltimore Sun Co. v. Astri Investment Management & Securities Corp. (In Re Astri Investment, Management & Securities Corp.)
(2×)
See Westmoreland v. CBS, 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , *735 105 S.Ct. 3478 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985); Publicker Industries, Inc., v. Cohen, 733 F.2d 1059, 1067-71 (3d Cir.1984); In re Continental Illinois Securities Litigation, 732 F.2d 1302, 1308-10 (7th Cir.1984); Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178-79 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984). 8 The Fourth Circuit recently held that certain pleadings and documents submitted in a civil case in support of a defendant’s successful motion for su…
cited
Cited "see"
Shaktman v. State
Accord United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335 , 1345 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, Hobson v. United States, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); Hudson, 368 So.2d at 902 .
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. General Teamsters Local No. 439, Paul McMillen Intervenor
See NLRB v. Carpenters Local Union No. 35, 739 F.2d 479, 481-82 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Richard E. Milhem, Sr. v. United States
See United States v. Cerri, 753 F.2d 61, 65 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joyner
See United States v. Ambrose, 740 F.2d 505, 513 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frieda M. Grosshans
See United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1242-43 (8th Cir.1984) (holding that the right to counsel does not imply the right to counsel who shares beliefs about the tax laws), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Mary Jane CURTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BILL HANNA FORD, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See Thomas v. Sams, 734 F.2d 185, 193 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 612 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Collin County v. Homeowners Ass'n for Values Essential to Neighborhoods (HAVEN)
See Thomas v. Sams, 734 F.2d 185, 189-190 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 612 (1985) (setting forth test for whether acts of judge are "judicial").
discussed
Cited "see"
Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Globe Newspaper Company, Intervenor
(2×)
See Westmoreland v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 22-23 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3478 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985); Publicker Industries, Inc. v. Cohen, 733 F.2d 1059, 1067-71 (3d Cir.1984); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1177-79 (6th Cir.1983); see also In the Matter of Continental Illinois Securities Litigation, 732 F.2d at 1308-09 (agreeing with the reasoning of those courts holding that there is a public right of access to civil trials though not specifically recognizing such a right).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Grant
See, e.g., United States v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251 (3d Cir.1984) (failure to be admitted pro hac vice), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); State v. White, 101 N.M. 310, 313-14 , 681 P.2d 736, 739-40 (1984) (failure of licensed out of state attorney to appear with in-state counsel, as per local rule); Wilson v. People, 652 P.2d 595 (Colo.1982) (failure to take the formal oath for membership in the bar), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1218 , 103 S.Ct. 1221 , 75 L.Ed.2d 457 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Johnson
See, e.g., United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United *824 States v. King, 724 F.2d 253, 256 (1st Cir.1984); United States v. Nooks, 446 F.2d 1283, 1288 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 299 , 30 L.Ed.2d 261 (1971); People v. Pearson, 150 Cal.App.2d 811, 815-19 , 311 P.2d 142, 145-46 (1957); People v. Klimek, 101 Ill.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Conley
See, e.g., United States v. Maker, 751 F.2d 614, 624-27 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ward
See also United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335 , reh’g denied 749 F.2d 733 , cert. denied, Hobson v. United States, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1984) (“knowledge” element of conspiracy refers to knowledge element of conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Curtis Waupekenay
See, e.g., United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 3478, 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. King, 724 F.2d 253, 256 (1st Cir.1984); United States v. Nooks, 446 F.2d 1283, 1288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 299 , 30 L.Ed.2d 261 (1971); People v. Pearson, 150 Cal.App.2d 811, 815-19 , 311 P.2d 142, 145-46 (1957); People v. Kli-mek, 101 Ill.App.3d 1, 6 , 56 Ill.Dec. 403, 408 , 427 N.E.2d 598 /603 (1981); Commonwealth v. Saia, 372 Mass. 53 , 360 N.E.2d 329, 332 (1977); State v. Bale, 267 N.W.2d 730, 732-33 (M…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jorge Enrique Gonzalez, A/K/A George, Maurice Roundy, Michael Timothy Sweeton
See also United States v. Bascaro, 142 F.2d 1335 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985) (“Best buyers’ ” close working relationship with drug ring brought them within RICO enterprise). 18 With these contentions of Gonzalez removed, the evidence presented to the jury was clearly sufficient to show his agreement on the overall objective of the Le-Quire enterprise.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Esposito
See, e.g., United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1237-38 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Slocum, 695 F.2d 650, 656-57 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983); United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (11th Cir.1982); United States v. Powell, 632 F.2d 754, 756-58 (9th Cir.1980).
Cable News Network, Inc.
v.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
v.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
No. 84-1377.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1985.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.