red
Negative treatment
11.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Radovanic v. Centex Real Estate Corp.
(2×)
But see Moore v. City of Charlotte, 754 F.2d 1100, 1106 (4th Cir.) (holding that plaintiff failed to prove a prima facie case of racial discrimination), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985). (c) Although no direct evidence of the fourth prong of the test was presented at trial, it does not appear from the record that Defendant eliminated the position of superintendent trainee after Plaintiff was terminated.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Michael E. MENNOR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the FORT HOOD NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellant
But cf. Crawford Fitting Co., 107 S.Ct. at 2499 (Blackmun, J., concurring), 2500 n. 1 (Marshall, J., dissenting) (language suggesting the Fifth Circuit passage relied upon here to be dictum) 22 Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 746 F.2d 4 , 11 n. 42, 30 (D.C.Cir.1984) (quoting Northcross v. Board of Educ., 611 F.2d 624 , 639 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 2999 , 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1980)), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985); see also Curtis, 822 F.2d at 550, 553 ; Thornberry v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 676 F.2d 1240 , 1241, 1244-45 (9th Cir…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bartee v. Morris
As Moore states, "[t]he most important variables in the disciplinary context, and the most likely sources of different but non- discriminatory treatment, are the nature of the offenses committed and the nature of the punishments imposed." Id. at 1105.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chalmers v. Tulon Co of Richmond
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 1105.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Maddelena Herbig v. International Business MacHines Corporation
(2×)
The purpose of the prima facie requirement is therefore served and the requirement met upon a showing (1) that plaintiff engaged in prohibited conduct similar to that of a person of another race, color, sex, religion, or national origin, and (2) that disciplinary measures enforced against the plaintiff were more severe than those enforced against the other person. 12 Id. at 1105.
cited
Cited "see"
Benjamin v. Global Language Center
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, N.C., 754 F.2d 1100 , 1105–06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Hinojoso-Soto
There is "no need for the police to readminister Miranda warnings[ where, as here,] defendant remained in continuous custody, nothing occurred that would have induced defendant to believe he was no longer the focal point of the investigation, and there was [*2]no reason to believe that defendant no longer understood his constitutional rights" ( People v Dudley , 31 AD3d 264, 265 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 866 [2006]; see People v Mendez , 77 AD3d 1312, 1312 [4th Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 799 [2011]; cf. People v Guilford , 21 NY3d 205, 209-213 [2013]; see generally People v Glinsman…
discussed
Cited "see"
Reed v. District of Columbia
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354, 371 (D.D.C.1983), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laborers' International Union v. Brand Energy Services LLC
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354 (D.D.C.1983), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985), as modified by Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Hodel, 857 F.2d 1516, 1524 (D.C.Cir.1988). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Roseboro v. Billington
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354, 371 (D.D.C.1983), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dawson v. United States
(2×)
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, NC, 754 F.2d 1100 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Agapito v. District of Columbia
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354 (D.D.C.1983), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985), as modified by Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Hodel, 857 F.2d 1516, 1524 (D.C.Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Blackman v. District of Columbia
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354 (D.D.C.1983), rev’d on other grounds, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Interfaith Community Organization v. Honeywell International, Inc.
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984) cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985), overruled in part by Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Hodel, 857 F.2d 1516 (D.C.Cir.1988) (enbanc). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Watkins v. Vance
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354 (D.D.C.1983), rev’d on other grounds, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Conference on Ministry to the Armed Forces v. James
See id. at 810-811 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 (holding that the record before the Court “amply supported] an inference that [the organization’s] participating in the CFC jeopardized the success of the Campaign ...” and thus OPM would be justified in excluding the organization if its exclusion was not motivated “by a desire to suppress a particular point of view.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of Treasury
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985), overruled in part by Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Hodel, 857 F.2d 1516 (D.C.Cir.1988) (en banc).
cited
Cited "see"
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Giuliani
See Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 809 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 .
discussed
Cited "see"
DiLoreto v. Downey Unified School District Board of Education
See Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 805 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 (“The decision of the Government to limit access to the [forum] is not dispositive in itself; instead, it is relevant for what it suggests about the Government’s intent in creating the forum.”) “This type of selective access does not transform government property into a public forum.” Perry, 460 U.S. at 47 , 103 S.Ct. 948 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rita Warren v. Fairfax County
See Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 799-800 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 (explaining that “[n]othing in the Constitution requires Government freely to grant access to all who wish to exercise their right to free speech on every type of Government property”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
(2×)
See Jones, 874 F.2d at 1539-40 (citing Moore v. City of Charlotte, 754 F.2d 1100, 1105 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985)).
examined
Cited "see"
Charita D. Chalmers v. Tulon Company of Richmond
(4×)
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, 754 F.2d 1100, 1105-06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Margaret S. Hall v. Marion School District Number 2
(2×)
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, 754 F.2d 1100, 1104 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herbig v. International Business MacHines Corp.
(2×)
See Moore v. City of Charlotte N.C., 754 F.2d 1100, 1105-06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbara A. Whalen v. United Air Lines, Inc.
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, 754 F.2d 1100, 1110 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 (1985). 19 Plaintiff also attempted to prove pretext by showing that she did not falsify her pay certs, as Defendant charged.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lees v. Case-Hoyt Corp.
(2×)
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, 754 F.2d 1100 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Bumpers v. Guarantee Trust Life Insurance Co.
See KN Energy, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co., 698 P.2d 769 (Colo.1985), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1022 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ricardo Rosas v. Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the Army
(2×)
See id. at 1105.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mildred A. Barringer v. At & T Technologies, Inc.
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, 754 F.2d 1100, 1104 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 (1985). 3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and applicable law are adequately presented in the materials before the Court, and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilder v. Bernstein
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, 746 F.2d 4, 24 (D.C.Cir.1984) (rate actually charged by a prevailing party’s counsel in private practice will provide fair compensation when used in determining a fee award as long as the rate falls within the range of rates charged by other firms in the community for similar work), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985); Barcia v. Sitkin, 683 F.Supp. 353, 357 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (in determining reasonable hourly rate, court would look first to any existing schedule of fees charged by counsel for services performed in previous or othe…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Marsh
(2×)
See NAACP v. Legal Defense & Education Fund, 753 F.2d 131, 136-37 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985). 67 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Springs v. Thomas
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354, 362-63 (D.D.C.1983) aff'd in part, rev. in part on other grounds, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cirl984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. State
(2×)
See Stout v. State, 693 P.2d 617, 627 (Okl.Cr. 1984), cert. denied 472 U.S. 1022 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patterson v. Magna American Corp.
See KN Energy, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co., 698 P.2d 769 (Colo.1985), ce rt. denied, 472 U.S. 1022 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985). *1388 Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
cited
Cited "see"
Thompson v. International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1986
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, North Carolina, 754 F.2d 1100, 1104 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985). 60 We do not reach such a conviction based simply upon a perception derived from a de novo review of the record that the "actual" facts are other than those found.
cited
Cited "see"
Warren v. Halstead Industries, Inc.
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, North Carolina, 754 F.2d 1100, 1104 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cartwright v. Maynard
See, Stout v. State, 693 P.2d 617 (Okl.Cr.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985), (the defendant killed two people by beating them to death in their bedroom; it does not appear that anyone else was present); To bler v. State, 688 P.2d 350 (Okl.Cr.1984) (two brothers, also alone in their home were murdered at close range with a shotgun); Robinson v. State, 677 P.2d 1080 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1246 , 104 S.Ct. 3524 , 82 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984), (all three victims were murdered in their home in an attempted robbery); and Dutton v. State, 674 P.2d 1134 (Okl.C…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cartwright v. Maynard
See, Stout v. State, 693 P.2d 617 (Okl.Cr.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985), (the defendant killed two people by beating them to death in their bedroom; it does not appear that anyone else was present); Tobler v. State, 688 P.2d 350 (Okl.Cr.1984) (two brothers, also alone in their home were murdered at close range with a shotgun); Robinson v. State, 677 P.2d 1080 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1246 , 104 S.Ct. 3524 , 82 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984), (all three victims were murdered in their home in an attempted robbery); and Dutton v. State, 674 P.2d 1134 (Okl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Uptain v. Huntington Lab, Inc.
(2×)
See KN Energy, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co., 698 P.2d 769 (Colo.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985); People v. Schwartz, 678 P.2d 1000 (Colo.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Jimmie Wilmington v. J.I. Case Company, Jimmie Wilmington v. J.I. Case Company
See Moore v. City of Charlotte, 754 F.2d 1100, 1105-06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Brewer v. State
(4×)
See Stout v. State, 693 P.2d 617 (Okl.Cr.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chun-Hoon v. McKee Foods Corp.
B; see also Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354 (D.D.C.1983), rev’d on other grounds, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , *853 105 S.Ct. 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985), as modified by Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Model, 857 F.2d 1516 (D.C.Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Chertoff
(2×)
See also Moore v. City of Charlotte, 754 *36 F.2d 1100, 1105-06 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985) (plaintiff may establish prima facie case by showing he was disciplined more severely than person of a different “race, color, sex, religion, or national origin” who engaged in the same prohibited conduct).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pruitt v. Howard Co. Sheriff's Dep't
Corp., 988 F.2d 507, 511 (4th Cir. 1993); see also Moore v. City of Charlotte, NC, 754 F.2d 1100, 1105-06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald L. Pruitt Dennis L. Pruitt v. Howard County Sheriff's Department Michael A. Chiuchiolo, Sheriff, Howard County Herbert Stonesifer
Corp., 988 F.2d 507, 511 (4th Cir.1993); see also Moore v. City of Charlotte, NC, 754 F.2d 1100, 1105-06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1021 (1985). 15 In granting the Department's motion under Rule 12(b)(6), the district court concluded that the face of the Pruitts' complaint did not state a prima facie claim of discrimination.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick v. State
(2×)
See also Stout v. State, 693 P.2d 617, 620 (Okl.Cr. 1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1022 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lefebvre
Allen, 803 P.2d at 1169 ; See also, Wilkerson v. District Court of McIntosh County, 839 P.2d 659, 661 (Okl.Cr.1992) (The severest sanctions may be appropriate against a defendant who does not comply with a discovery order where noncompliance is flagrant, even if that means denying the accused the right to present witnesses in his own defense.) Trial courts are and must be cloaked with broad judicial discretion regarding pre-trial discovery to ensure timely disclosure, Stout v. State, 693 P.2d 617, 625 (Okl.Cr.1984), cert. denied 472 U.S. 1022 , 105 S.Ct. 3489 , 87 L.Ed.2d 623 (1985), which inc…
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
v.
N. A. A. C. P. Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
v.
N. A. A. C. P. Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
No. 84-1678.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1985.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.