green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1933 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1933
1979
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Johnson-Ford
See In re Morris, 495 A.2d 1162, 1163 (D.C.1985), cert denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Covington
See In re Morris, 495 A.2d 1162, 1163 (D.C.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Zeiger
See In re Morris, 495 A.2d 1162, 1163 (D.C.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Vitello v. Liturgy Training Publications
See Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Small v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.
See Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Harris Trust and Sav. Bank v. Salomon Bros., Inc.
See Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bennett
See LaRouche v. Crowell, 709 S.W.2d 585, 587-588 (Tenn.App. [1985]), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986). 9 .Tenn.R.Crim.P. 47. 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Beach v. First Union National Bank of North Carolina (In Re Carley Capital Group)
See Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986), citing, Benson v. Cady, 761 F.2d 335, 338 (7th Cir.1985), quoting, Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-02 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Parker v. Chicago Housing Authority
See Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Barbera v. Smith
See Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 185 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Barbera v. Smith
See Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 185 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Marmon Group, Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.
Joseph’s Hosp., 788 F.2d 411, 414 (7th Cir.1986) (citations omitted); accord Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986); Benson v. Cady, 761 F.2d 335, 338 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atchley v. County of Du Page
See Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 185 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986) {quoting Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir.1982)); see also Jensen, 747 F.2d at 192 (discussing Bowers).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Braden Shielding Systems v. Shielding Dynamics
A motion to dismiss should not be granted unless it “appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hudson v. Sullivan
A motion to dismiss should not be granted unless it “appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jenssen v. United States Postal Service
Dismissal Standard A motion to dismiss should not be granted unless it “appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holtz v. Plastore, Inc.
A motion to dismiss should not be granted unless it “appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elliott v. ITT Corp.
A motion to dismiss should not be granted unless it “appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of [her] claim which would entitle [her] to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William J. Leahy v. The Board Of Trustees Of Community College District No. 508
We will affirm the dismissal of a complaint only if "it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leahy v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508
We will affirm the dismissal of a complaint only if “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Szelenyi
See, e.g., Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 186 (7th Cir.1985) (noting that there “may be situations when a municipal employee and the municipality have, by virtue of the employment relationship, a special relationship for purposes of § 1983,” but finding no such relationship on the facts of that case), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Betty J. Archie v. City of Racine, Ronald W. Chiapete, and George W. Giese
(2×)
As the court put the point in Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616 (7th Cir.1982), all of these cases are variations on the principle that "[i]f the state puts a man in a position of danger from private persons and then fails to protect him ... it is as much an active tortfeasor as if it had thrown him into a snake pit." Id. at 618 ; see also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 187 (7th Cir.1985) (Coffey, J., concurring), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986). 1 76 Mr. Giese did not only fail to dispatch an ambulance to Mrs. DeLacy.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alexander Patton v. Raymond Przybylski
(2×)
Joseph's Hosp. of Fort Wayne, 788 F.2d 411, 414 (7th Cir.1986) (citations omitted); see also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986); Benson v. Cady, 761 F.2d 335, 338 (7th Cir.1985). 22 Despite these well-settled principles, the majority--with only the complaint before it--determines the reasonableness of the particular arresting officer's conduct, the credibility of the allegation that the arresting officer caused the plaintiff's further detention, and the reasonableness of the conduct of the officers …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendez Through Mendez v. Rutherford
See, e.g., Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 185 (7th Cir.1985) (“The Constitution creates a duty on the part of police officers to protect minor children from immediate hazards after police officers arrest the children’s guardian”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986); Walker v. Rowe, 791 F.2d 507 (7th Cir.) (“When the state arrests the adult having custody of a child, the state had better take care of the child”), cert. denied, — U.S. —- 107 S.Ct. 597 , 93 L.Ed.2d 597 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Patricia E. Gilmore, Joseph P. Gilmore v. John J. Buckley
See also Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182 (7th Cir. 1985) (suggesting that municipality may assume a “special relationship” in respect of municipal employee by virtue of employment relationship, requiring municipality to provide police protection), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1265 , 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986). 12 In Martinez , the Supreme Court gave only vague hints as to what circumstances, if any, might create such a special relationship and render the state liable for a parolee’s crime.
Robert L. KENT, Jr.
v.
SANBORN COOPERATIVE GRAIN COMPANY
v.
SANBORN COOPERATIVE GRAIN COMPANY
No. 85-1138.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1986.
106 S. Ct. 1265
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Denied.