green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
“foster was required only to produce evidence ... about whether she possessed the minimum qualifications for the job, not whether she was as qualified or more so than the person whom arcata selected.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Cannon v. Edgar
But see Mitchell v. Pepsi-Cola Bottlers, Inc., 772 F.2d 342, 346-47 (7th Cir.1985) (Illinois claim for tortious termination of employment preempted), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986).
discussed
Cited "but see"
University of Chicago Hospital & Medical Center v. Rivers
But see Michell v. Pepsi-Cola Bottlers, Inc., 772 F.2d 342 , 344 (7th Cir.1985) (section 1441(c) “makes clear that defendant may remove an entire case to federal court whenever a removable claim is joined with one or more otherwise non-removable claims”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986). 3 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hogan v. Henderson
foster was required only to produce evidence ... about whether she possessed the minimum qualifications for the job, not whether she was as qualified or more so than the person whom arcata selected.
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. J.P. Allen Co.
See Foster v. Areata Assocs., 772 F.2d 1453, 1462 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986); Radobenko v. Automated Equip.
discussed
Cited "see"
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. v. Gordini U.S.A. Inc.
Furthermore, the nonmoving party generally “cannot create an issue of fact by an affidavit contradicting his prior deposition testimony.” Kennedy, 952 F.2d at 266 ; see Foster v. Areata Assocs., 772 F.2d 1453, 1462 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986); Radobenko v. Automated Equip.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cain v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.
See Foster v. Arcata Associates, 772 F.2d 1453, 1462 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986); Radobenko v. Automated Equipment Corp., 520 F.2d 540, 543-44 (9th Cir.1975). “[I]f a party who has been examined at length on deposition could raise an issue of fact simply by submitting an affidavit contradicting his own prior testimony, this would greatly diminish the utility of summary judgment as a procedure for screening out sham issues of fact.” Foster, 772 F.2d at 1462 ; Radobenko, 520 F.2d at 544 (quoting Perma Research and Development Co. v. Si…
cited
Cited "see"
Atchley v. Heritage Cable Vision Associates
See Mitchell v. Pepsi-Cola Bottlers, Inc., 772 F.2d 342, 347 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael C. Marino v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
See Foster v. Arcata Assocs., 772 F.2d 1453, 1459 (9th Cir. 1985) (holding that plaintiff must identify actions that give rise to inference of disparate treatment), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986), overruled on other grounds by, Kennedy v. Allied Mut.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Via, 146 Ariz. 108, 122 , 704 P.2d 238, 252 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1268 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986) (noting trial court’s considerable discretion in deciding whether to admit evidence under Ariz. R.Evid. 403).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard C. Thompson v. State of Arizona
See Foster v. Arcata Associates, Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1463 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blanca L. Iturbe Angel Iturbe v. Wandel & Golterman Technologies, Incorporated
See Foster v. Arcata Associates, Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1456 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986). 26 Although Angel Iturbe is a member of a protected class, the district court found that Manfred Kraeuter, his fellow machinist, started at a higher rate of pay based on experience and job performance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Russell Lee White v. Peter Demosthenes, Nevada State Prison
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Cambell v. Marshall, 769 F.2d 314, 315-24 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986). 8 (b) White also claims that his attorney was ineffective because he failed to investigate the allegations by the three inmates.
cited
Cited "see"
Anselmo Chavez v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
See Foster v. Arcata Assocs., Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1459-61 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry D. Faryman
See Campbell v. Marshall, 769 F.2d 314 (6th Cir.1985) (plea agreement enforced where the district court failed to inform defendant specifically of his rights because defendant signed a document which discussed the applicable rights), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Deshaw
Accord, United States v. Boldin, 772 F.2d 719 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 , 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1498 , 89 L.Ed.2d 899 , 475 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 1520 , 89 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 479 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 67, 107 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 , 93 L.Ed.2d 34 (1985). 26 .
cited
Cited "see"
Eloise F. Holdahl v. Donald B. Rice, Secretary, Department of the Air Force
See Foster v. Arcata Assoc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1459 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1992
See Miller v. Stagner, 757 F.2d 988, 993 (9th Cir.), as amended, 768 F.2d 1090 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 1049, 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 1271, 89 L.Ed.2d 577 , 579 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Carriger v. Lewis
See Miller v. Stagner, 757 F.2d 988, 993 (9th Cir.), as amended, 768 F.2d 1090 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 1049, 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 1271, 89 L.Ed.2d 577 , 579 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anselmo Chavez v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
See Foster v. Arcata Associates, Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1459-61 (9th Cir.1985) (female employee presented sufficient evidence on claims of sex and age discrimination to create an inference of discriminatory conduct where male employee filled the position), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miles, Inc. v. Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation
See Day v. Rosenthal, 170 Cal.App.3d 1125, 1164 , 217 Cal.Rptr. 89, 114 (1985) ("in some cases, only the trier of fact can ascertain when the consequential damage became sufficiently appreciable to put a reasonable person on notice"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.
See Foster v. Arcata Associates, 772 F.2d 1453, 1462 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986); Radobenko v. Automated Equipment Corp., 520 F.2d 540, 543-44 (9th Cir.1975). "[I]f a party who has been examined at length on deposition could raise an issue of fact simply by submitting an affidavit contradicting his own prior testimony, this would greatly diminish the utility of summary judgment as a procedure for screening out sham issues of fact." Foster, 772 F.2d at 1462 ; Radobenko, 520 F.2d at 544 (quoting Perma Research and Development Co. v. Singer…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. Allied Mutual Insurance
See Foster v. Arcata Associates, 772 F.2d 1453, 1462 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986); Radobenko v. Automated Equipment Corp., 520 F.2d 540, 543-44 (9th Cir.1975). “[I]f a party who has been examined at length on deposition could raise an issue of fact simply by submitting an affidavit contradicting his own prior testimony, this would greatly diminish the utility of summary judgment as a procedure for screening out sham issues of fact.” Foster, 772 F.2d at 1462 ; Radobenko, 520 F.2d at 544 (quoting Perma Research and Development Co. v. Si…
cited
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. Peralta Community College District
See Foster v. Arcata Assocs., Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1459 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Rosenthal v. Justices Of The Supreme Court Of California
See Day v. Rosenthal, 170 Cal.App.3d 1125 , 217 Cal.Rptr. 89 (App.Ct.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Rosenthal v. Justices of the Supreme Court of California
See Day v. Rosenthal, 170 Cal.App.3d 1125 , 217 Cal.Rptr. 89 (App.Ct.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1990
See generally Nimrod Marketing (Overseas) Ltd. v. Texas Energy Investment Corp., 769 F.2d 1076, 1080 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 , and 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1948 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); Restatement (Second) of Contracts Sec. 90(1) (1981); M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Midamar Corp.v. National-Ben Franklin Insurance Co. of Illinois
See generally Nimrod Marketing (Overseas) Ltd. v. Texas Energy Investment Corp., 769 F.2d 1076, 1080 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 , and 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1948 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90(1) (1981); M.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mauro
See State v. Via, 146 Ariz. 108, 117 , 704 P.2d 238, 247 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1268 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
54 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1873, 45 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,758, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,996
See Fed.R.App.P. 10(b)(2). 46 Although courts should use summary procedures judiciously when intent is an issue, Foster v. Arcata Associates, Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1459 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986); Douglas v. Anderson, 656 F.2d 528, 535 (9th Cir.1981), purely conclusory allegations of alleged discrimination, with no concrete, relevant particulars, will not bar summary judgment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.I. Credit Corp. v. Gohres
See, e.g., Foster v. ArCata Assoc., Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1462 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986) (holding that a party may not “create his own issue of fact by an affidavit contradicting his prior deposition testimony.”) Further, a non-moving party may not rely on the court to simply disbelieve the moving party’s evidence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Civil Liberties Union v. Mercer County
See, e.g., Hawley v. City of Cleveland, 773 F.2d 736 (6th Cir.1985) cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986); Washegesic v. Bloomingdale Public Schools, 33 F.3d 679 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1095 , 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mills v. United States Postal Service
Roman, 821 F.2d at 387-88 ; see also Mitchell v. Pepsi-Cola Bottlers Inc., 772 F.2d 342, 347 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Granzeier v. Middleton
See Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464 , 102 S.Ct. 752 , 70 L.Ed.2d 700 (1982); see also Hawley v. City of Cleveland, 773 F.2d 736 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James M. Dombroski v. John Sutro, Hon. Presiding Judge, Municipal Court of the State of California, County of Marin
Given that the jury could not return a verdict on Count 2 and therefore could not reach a decision as to whether he had a blood alcohol level of 0.08%, Dombroski has failed to show either how the partition ratio evidence would have been probative, or how the district court's exclusion of the ratio evidence had a "substantial or injurious impact on the jury's verdict." See Brecht v. Abrahamson, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 1722 (1993); see also Miller v. Stagner, 757 F.2d 988, 994 (9th Cir.1985) (considering the probative value of the evidence in determining whether its exclusion violated petitioner's due p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Strong
See, e.g., State v. Via, 146 Ariz. 108, 119 , 704 P.2d 238, 249 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1268 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986) (defendant was only subject with “the beginnings of a full beard”); State v. Money, 110 Ariz. 18, 21-23 , 514 P.2d 1014, 1017-19 (1973) (in-person lineup not unduly suggestive despite minor differences in height, weight and hair length, and where only defendant had a mustache); State v. Bailes, 118 Ariz. 582, 587 , 578 P.2d 1011, 1016 (App.1978) (photographic lineup not unduly suggestive despite fact that only defendant was disfigured with two blacken…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Krone
(2×)
Compare State v. Adamson, 136 Ariz. 250, 257 , 665 P.2d 972, 979 (summarily approving admission of similar statements), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 204 , 78 L.Ed.2d 178 (1983) with State v. Via, 146 Ariz. 108, 121 , 704 P.2d 238, 251 (1985) (approving admission of hearsay when “primary purpose” was “to show that [the] declarant acted in accordance with his stated intention to be at a certain place at a certain time”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1268 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fred Lemnitzer and Ken Green v. Philippine Airlines, Inc.
Id.; see also Foster v. Arcata Associates Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1461-62 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leydell Baker v. McNeil Island Corrections Center
Frangante, 888 F.2d at 595 ; see also Foster v. Arcata Associates, Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1461-62 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986). " 'Credibility determinations are insulated from appellate review.' " Jordan v. Clark, 847 F.2d 1368, 1375 (9th Cir.1988) (quoting Johnson v. United States v. Postal Serv., 756 F.2d 1461, 1464 (9th Cir.1985)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1006 (1989). 5 Here, the district court assumed without deciding that an employment relationship existed for purposes of Title VII.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lois J. Corwye v. The Boeing Company
Id.; see also Foster v. Arcata Associates, Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1461-62 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Debora Hillding v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company, a Delaware Corporation
Discharge 8 To establish a prima facie case of intentional discrimination, a plaintiff has the burden of providing evidence "which give[s] rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination." Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253 (1981); see also Foster v. Arcata Associates, Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1459-61 (9th Cir.1985) (female employee presented sufficient evidence on claims of sex and age discrimination to create an inference of discriminatory conduct where male employee filled the position), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986). 9 While Hillding is not required to prove he…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jose v. M/V FIR GROVE
See also Foster v. Areata Assoc., Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1462-63 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986) (in opposing summary judgment, plaintiff could not claim she only expressed a preference for not working in Monterey after testifying at deposition that she conditioned employment on Monterey location); and Yamaha Corp. of America v. ABC Intern.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Garland Claude Cochran
To establish a conspiracy, “[a]n overt act is not required, only proof that the defendant conspired to commit the prohibited offense.” United States v. Sanchez, 722 F.2d 1501, 1505 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, *1018 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2396 , 81 L.Ed.2d 353 (1984); see also United States v. Boldin, 779 F.2d 618, 619 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986) (amending prior opinion to omit an overt act requirement from the elements of proof necessary for a conspiracy in violation of section 846).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conan Properties, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.
Co. v. Singer Co., 410 F.2d 572, 578 (2d Cir.1969) (“If a party who has been examined at length on deposition could raise an issue of fact simply by submitting an affidavit contradicting his own prior testimony, this would greatly diminish the utility of summary judgment as a procedure for screening out sham issues of fact.”); Whitfield v. Cohen, 682 F.Supp. 188, 191 (S.D.N.Y.1988); see also Foster v. Areata Assocs., 772 F.2d 1453, 1462-63 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986); cf Ansam Assocs., Inc. v. Cola Petroleum, Ltd., 760 F.2d 442 , 446…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Zielke
See, e.g., Hawley v. City of Cleveland, 773 F.2d 736, 741-42 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Patrick Zielke
See, e.g., Hawley v. City of Cleveland, 773 F.2d 736, 741-42 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pejic v. Hughes Helicopters, Inc.
Limongelli v. Postmaster Gen. of the United States, 707 F.2d 368, 372 (9th Cir.1983); see also Foster v. Arcata Assocs., Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1458-59 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pejic v. Hughes Helicopters, Inc.
Limongelli v. Postmaster Gen. of the United States, 707 F.2d 368, 372 (9th Cir.1983); see also Foster v. Arcata Assocs., Inc., 772 F.2d 1453, 1458-59 (9th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1267 , 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gaddis v. Orgulf Transport Co.
See also, Mitchell v. Pepsi Cola Bottlers, Inc., 772 F.2d 342, 346 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986) (§ 301 preempts “issues which could have been resolved by grievance and arbitration”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
See, e.g., Mitchell v. Pepsi-Cola Bottlers, Inc., 772 F.2d 342 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986); Oglesby v. RCA Corp., 752 F.2d 272 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca7 1987
See, e.g., Mitchell v. Pepsi-Cola Bottlers, Inc., 772 F.2d 342 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986); Oglesby v. RCA Corp., 752 F.2d 272 (7th Cir.1985). 27 Our analysis will follow several steps.
Sonderegger
v.
E. F. Hutton & Co., Inc.
v.
E. F. Hutton & Co., Inc.
No. 85-1179.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1986.
Cited by 60 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Arizona (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.