green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Walker v. Grether
See LeMaire v. Maass, 12 F.3d 1444, 1456 (9th Cir. 1993). “‘The fact that 3 the food occasionally contains foreign objects or sometimes is served cold, while unpleasant, does 4 not amount to a constitutional deprivation.’” Id. (quoting Hamm v. DeKalb Cnty., 774 F.2d 1567 , 5 1575 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 (1986)); see also Robinson v. Danberg, 673 F. 6 App’x 205, 213 (3d Cir. 2016) (finding prisoner’s condition of confinement claim alleging two 7 pieces of metal in his food did not “amount to a substantial deprivation, or anything more than 8 temporary distres…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Krout
See United States v. Mitchell, 777 F.2d 248, 255 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1493 , 89 L.Ed.2d 895 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bryan
See State v. Fair, 197 Conn. 106, 111 , 496 A.2d 461 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S. Ct. 1494 , 89 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Swift v. Lewis
See Wilson v. Schillinger, 761 F.2d 921, 926-28 (3rd Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1494 , 89 L.Ed.2d 895 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1990
See Wilson v. Schillinger, 761 F.2d 921, 926-28 (3rd Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1494 , 89 L.Ed.2d 895 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Byron Green v. Margaret Baron Joan Wright Sherri Shea Dr. R.T. Lara and Gary Kirchhof
See Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Finney v. Arkansas Bd. of Correction, 505 F.2d 194 , 207 (8th Cir.1974); cf. Wycoff v. Brewer, 572 F.2d 1260 , 1263 & n. 5 (8th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Benjamin Butler, Jr. v. Forrest L. Jewell, Sheriff, Berrien County
See Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573-75 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carapellucci v. Town of Winchester
See Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1574 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Robinson v. Moses, 644 F.Supp. 975, 980-81 (N.D.Ind.1986) (following Hamm).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary H. v. Hegstrom
See Hamm v. DeKalb, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) (“failure to provide [minimal level] of necessities violates due process— even though the conditions imposed serve some ordinarily legitimate state objective”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary v. Hegstrom
See Hamm v. DeKalb, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) ("failure to provide [minimal level] of necessities violates due process--even though the conditions imposed serve some ordinarily legitimate state objective"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986). 44 Defendants argue that the district court erred in applying these standards by (1) balancing the juveniles' liberty rights against the state's interest, thus failing to give "proper deference" to the state officials' professional judgment, and (2) improperly relying on the plaintiffs' experts in making its con…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christopher Burgos v. State of New Jersey (075736)
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb Cnty., 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir. 1985) (“[S]tate’s interest in limiting the cost of detention . . . will justify neither the complete denial of [food, living space, and medical care] nor the provision of those necessities below some minimally adequate level.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S. Ct. 1492 , 89 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christopher Burgos v. State of New Jersey (075736)
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb Cnty., 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) (“[S]tate’s interest in limiting the cost of detention ... will justify neither the complete denial of [food, living space, and medical care] nor the provision of those necessities below some minimally adequate level.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Battle v. Anderson, 594 F.2d 786, 792 (10th Cir.1979) (“[Constitutional treatment of human beings confined to penal institutions ... is not dependent upon the willingness or the financial ability of the state to provide decent penit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antone R. White, A/K/A Tone
Compare United States v. Kragness, 830 F.2d 842, 864 (8th Cir.1987) ("[Pjroof of the RICO conspiracy in fact rested upon proof of the drug conspiracies, and not upon proof of an agreement that some other predicate offenses would be committed.”) and United States v. Johnson, 911 F.2d 1394, 1398 (10th Cir.1990) with United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1371 (2d Cir.1985) ("[A] RICO conspiracy charge is satisfied by proof of an agreement to commit a felony, no proof of conspiracy to commit narcotics violations is necessary,”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 818 , 107 S.Ct. 78 , 93 L.Ed.2d 34 (1986…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Larry D. Smith v. H. Christian Debruyn
Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347-48 , 101 S.Ct. 2392, 2399-2400 (1981); Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535 , 99 S.Ct. 1861, 1872 (1979); compare Thompson v. City of Los Angeles, 885 F.2d 1439, 1448 (9th Cir.1989) (failure to provide bed or mattress punishment) and Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1575 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 (1986) (unsanitary food and sleeping on mattress on floor not punishment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramirez v. Coughlin
See, e.g., Wilson v. Schillinger, 761 F.2d 921, 930 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1494 , 89 L.Ed.2d 895 (1986); Benjamin v. Coughlin, 643 F.Supp. 351, 352 (S.D.N.Y.1986); Bryant v. McGinnis, 463 F.Supp. 373, 387-88 (W.D.N.Y.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ricketts
“As with other affirmative defenses, the defendant has the burden of [proving an extreme emotional disturbance] by a fair preponderance of the evidence.” State v. Zdanis, supra, 390 ; see also State v. Fair, 197 Conn. 106, 110 , 496 A.2d 461 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S. Ct. 1494 , 89 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connor v. State
(2×)
Compare Minjares v. State, 577 S.W.2d 222, 224 (Tex.Crim.App.1978) ("defendant's failure to obtain counsel when provided adequate opportunity to do so constitutes a waiver under the facts of the case") and United States v. Mitchell, 777 F.2d 248, 257-58 (5th Cir.1985) (district court did not abuse discretion in denying continuance even though it resulted in defendant’s being unrepresented throughout trial where defendant had hired attorney knowing of the attorney’s schedule conflict and had failed to hire another attorney even though he had several months to do so), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Shalala
See, e.g., Suarez v. Secretary of HHS, 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 133 , 88 L.Ed.2d 109 (1985) and cases cited therein (including decisions from the District of Columbia and Seventh Circuits, as well as Futernick, supra); see also Kidda v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, 769 F.2d 165 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1494 , 89 L.Ed.2d 896 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carl Dean Swift and David Raymond Gren v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Carl Dean Swift, and David Raymond Gren v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director
See also Wilson v. Schillinger, 761 F.2d 921 (3rd Cir.1985) (same two factors are threshold issue in evaluating a prisoner's free-exercise argument), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 (1986). 16 Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prisoners, as we must, the ADOC officials' denials of the prisoners religious exemptions were not because the officials determined the prisoners' Vows were insincere or secular, but rather because the Vow was not a "recognized religion." Samuel Lewis, the ADOC Director, wrote to Swift: 17 I have reviewed your grievance appeal concerning your request to …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monmouth County Correctional Institutional Inmates v. William Lanzaro
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) ("state's interest in limiting the cost of detention ... will justify neither the complete denial of ... [food, living space, and medical care] nor the provision of those necessities below some minimally adequate level"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Wright v. Rushen, 642 F.2d 1129, 1134 (9th Cir.1981) ("costs cannot be permitted to stand in the way of eliminating conditions below Eighth Amendment standards"); Battle v. Anderson, 594 F.2d 786, 792 (10th Cir.1979) (" 'constitutional tr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monmouth County Correctional Institutional Inmates v. Lanzaro
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1573 (11th Cir.1985) (“state’s interest in limiting the cost of detention ... will justify neither the complete denial of ... [food, living space, and medical care] nor the provision of those necessities below some minimally adequate level”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Wright v. Rushen, 642 F.2d 1129, 1134 (9th Cir.1981) (“costs cannot be permitted to stand in the way of eliminating conditions below Eighth Amendment standards”); Battle v. Anderson, 594 F.2d 786, 792 (10th Cir.1979) (“ ‘con…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Danese v. Asman
See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1572-1574 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1492 , 89 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986). (“Application of the Bell v. Wolfish standard to [basic conditions such as food, living space and medical care] is exceedingly difficult and does not provide clear results.” Id. at 1573.) This has proved especially true in a case such as this where a detainee commits suicide and *716 the administrator of the deceased’s estate brings a section 1983 action alleging that the suicide was a result of improper medical care, a lack of proper training …
Hamm
v.
DeKalb County, Georgia
v.
DeKalb County, Georgia
No. 85-1348.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1986.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.