green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.2 score
“simply because a witness alters some portion of his testimony at the time of trial is not a sufficient reason to conclude that the new testimony is false, or that the commonwealth knew or had reason to know that it was false”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Calvin G. Wright Jack Critchfield Desert Forest Products, Inc., D/B/A Hutchinson, Carter Company v. U.S. Postal Service
Power Corp. v. United States Postal Serv., 530 F.Supp. 702 , 706 n. 3 (C.D.Cal.1982) (“the Contract Disputes Act implicitly repeals [the sovereign immunity waiver] of the Postal Reorganization Act ... as to contract claims against USPS”); but see North Side Lumber Co. v. Block, 753 F.2d 1482, 1486 (9th Cir.) (the CDA does not “divest[ ] the district court of jurisdiction over all actions relating to the contracts brought under any head of jurisdiction”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 919 , 106 S.Ct. 248 , 88 L.Ed.2d 256 (1985), the law of the Ninth Circuit now compels the opposite conclusion.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Ware
simply because a witness alters some portion of his testimony at the time of trial is not a sufficient reason to conclude that the new testimony is false, or that the commonwealth knew or had reason to know that it was false
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Salt Lick Bancorp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
reviewing court can sustain the judgment of a lower court on any ground that finds support in the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lone Rock Timber Co. v. United States Department of Interior
See North Side Lumber Co. v. Block, 753 F.2d 1482, 1485 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 919 , 106 S.Ct. 248 , 88 L.Ed.2d 256 and cert. denied, 474 U.S. 931 , 106 S.Ct. 265 , 88 L.Ed.2d 271 (1985) (if claim *442 is “contract-related” but “rested at bottom on statutory rights” then it is not a claim founded upon a contract within the meaning of the Tucker Act, and does not preclude review under the APA, providing the party is not seeking money damages, either directly or indirectly).
discussed
Cited "see"
Region 8 Forest Service Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock
See .also North Side Lumber Co. v. Block, 753 F.2d 1482, 1486 (9th Cir.) (timber contract falls within the Contract Disputes Act), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 919 , 106 S.Ct. 248 , 88 L.Ed.2d 256 and cert. denied, 474 U.S. 931 , 106 S.Ct. 265 , 88 L.Ed.2d 271 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Region 8 Forest Service Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock
See North Side Lumber Co. v. Block, 753 F.2d 1482, 1485-86 (9th Cir.1985), cert. den., 474 U.S. 919 , 106 S.Ct. 248 , 88 L.Ed.2d 256 (1985); Mega- *271 pulse, Inc. v. Lewis, 672 F.2d 959, 971 (D.C.Cir.1982); National Helium Corporation v. Morton, 455 F.2d 650, 654 (10th Cir.1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Georgia Casualty and Surety Company, a Georgia Corporation v. United States
(2×)
See North Side Lumber Co. v. Block, 753 F.2d 1482, 1484 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 919 , 106 S.Ct. 248 , 265, 88 L.Ed.2d 271 (1985); Woodbury v. United States, 313 F.2d 291, 295 (9th Cir.1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Curtis Lee Clark v. Theodore Koehler
See United States v. Anderson Count, Tennessee, 761 F.2d 1169, 1174-75 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 248 (1985); County of Oakland v. City of Berkley, 742 F.2d 289, 298 (6th Cir.1984); M.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Region 8 Forest Service Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock
See also North Side Lumber Co. v. Block, 753 F.2d 1482, 1486 (9th Cir.) (timber contract falls within the Contract Disputes Act), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 919 , 106 S.Ct. 248 , 88 L.Ed.2d 256 and cert. denied, 474 U.S. 931 , 106 S.Ct. 265 , 88 L.Ed.2d 271 (1985) 11 The Council and the Timber Companies rely entirely on National Helium Corp. v. Morton, 455 F.2d 650 (10th Cir.1971), to support their contention that the CDA does not bar our consideration of their contract injuries in assessing whether they have standing.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson County, Tennessee
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-308.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1985.
Cited by 57 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.