green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
People v. Cunningham
Several such statutes have been construed to include conduct similar to that in which defendant engaged (see People v Susalla, 392 Mich 387, 220 NW2d 405 [1974]; Filor, Bullard & Smyth v Insurance Co. of N. Am., 605 F2d 598, 603-604 [1978], cert denied 440 US 962 [1979] [interpreting, in dictum, New York’s forgery statute]; 36 Am Jur 2d, Forgery § 10, at 537 [2001 ed]; cf. United States v Fontana, supra at 803-804; Commonwealth v Williams, 391 Pa Super 389, 571 A2d 423 [1990]; Hill v Sheriff, Clark County, 95 Nev 438, 596 P2d 234 [1979]; but see State v Deutsch, 103 NM 752 , 713 P2d 1008 [1…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Swenson
it requires no extended discussion of authority to demonstrate that omissions or concealment of material information can constitute fraud . . . cognizable under the mail fraud statute, without proof of a duty to disclose the information. . . .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. David Romo, Jr., Ann Romo, Juanita Romo
where the witness appears to be equally available or unavailable to both sides, we think it is well within the district court's discretion to refuse to allow such argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Tuttle v. Combined Insurance
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 , cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ovalle-Marquez v. United States
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Santiago v. United States
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Hawaii Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
See Proctor v. United States, 781 F.2d 752, 753 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2918 , 91 L.Ed.2d 546 (1986). 14 .
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur Frank Sanford v. Ira Reiner Edward Miller John Nickols Gary W. Hutton Michael Brenner
See id. 9 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1992
See Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co., 775 F.2d 1030, 1036-37 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 547 (1986); Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Homer L. Brand v. United States
See Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co., 775 F.2d 1030 , 1035 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. Chicago Housing Authority
See Fleming v. County of Kane, 855 F.2d 496, 497 (7th Cir.1988) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 683 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986)) (“Overly long briefs, however, may actually hurt a party’s case, making it ‘far more likely that meritorious arguments will be lost amid the mass of detail.’ ”). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Schmutz v. Bolles
United States v. Bak *1313 er, 693 F.2d 183, 188 (D.C.Cir.1982); see United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 694 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); see also E.
discussed
Cited "see"
Reilly v. Hussey (In re Reilly)
See Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co., 775 F.2d 1030, 1034 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 547 (1986); Castro v. United States, 775 F.2d 399, 408-10 (1st Cir.1985); In re Hartford Textile Corp., 681 F.2d 895 , 897-98 (2nd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 1195 , 75 L.Ed.2d 439 (1983); Harrelson v. United States, 613 F.2d 114, 116 (5th Cir.1980); Ruderer v. United States, 462 F.2d 897, 899 (8th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1031 , 93 S.Ct. 540 , 34 L.Ed.2d 482 (1972); In re Rugley, 75 B.R. 94, 95-96 (Bankr.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin Schwimmer
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); Kevlik v. Goldstein, 724 F.2d 844, 849 (1st Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Packer Avenue Associates (A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership). Appeal of Armand Ceritano
See Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co., 775 F.2d 1030, 1034 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 547 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca1 1989
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Friedman, 445 F.2d 1076 , 1085 n. 4 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 958 , 92 S.Ct. 326 , 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bay State Ambulance & Hospital Rental Service, Inc.
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Friedman, 445 F.2d 1076 , 1085 n. 4 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 958 , 92 S.Ct. 326 , 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Bernstein v. Crazy Eddie, Inc.
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 700 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Laurence John Layton
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 700 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986) (attorneys representing corporation had no attorney-client relationship with individual employees, where “no express agreement for individual representation was made” and where employees never asked attorney directly or indirectly to represent them).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephen A. Frlekin, Sui Juris, and as Trustee of Lillian's Sculptured Fabrics Trust
Instead, they contend that the lien was filed to force Bushell to act within the scope of her duties and to prevent her from obtaining bank and other records of the Lillian's Sculptured Fabrics Trust, which Frlekin argues is wholly unrelated to the business entity named Lillian's Sculptured Fabrics. 4 In Ryan v. Bilby, we upheld the district court's expungement of similar liens, finding that section 7402(a) of the Internal Revenue Code empowers the district courts "to void common-law liens imposed by taxpayers on the property of government officials assigned to collect delinquent taxes." 1 764…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael J. Willenberg
See id.; see also Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co., 775 F.2d 1030, 1035 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 (1986). 7 Willenberg contends the government lacks standing to bring this action because he served his "Affidavit" on Becker in his personal capacity and filed the lien against Becker's personal property.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene Hannigan
(2×)
See also, e.g., United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 691 (7th Cir.1985) ("Since the government is under no duty, to negate all possible innocent inferences from a set of circumstantial facts, it should not be required to present proof that the custom is 'invariable.' Instead, it is sufficient to prove that mailing is the sender's regular business practice.” (citation omitted)), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Miller, 676 F.2d 359, 362 (9th Cir.) (where an employee testified that all hand-delivered documents were marked "delivered,�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Haggigan
See also, e.g., United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 691 (7th Cir. 1985) ("Since the government is under no duty to negate all possible innocent inferences from a set of circumstantial facts, it should not be required to present proof that the custom is 'invariable.' Instead, it is sufficient to prove that mailing is the sender's regular business practice." (citation omitted)), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S. Ct. 2919 (1986); United States v. Miller, 676 F.2d 359, 362 (9th Cir.) (where an employee testified that all hand-delivered documents were marked "delivered," but admitted to so…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerry A. Jones and Arturo Gonzales Aguilar
See also United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 702-03 (7th Cir.1985) (restriction on drawing adverse inference because of missing witness applies to government as well as defendant), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 (1986); United States v. Coe, 718 F.2d 830, 841 (7th Cir.1984) (same); United States v. Cohen, 631 F.2d 1223, 1227 (5th Cir.1981) (same). 20 Next, Jones argues that Blakemore applies only where counsel specifically asks the jury to draw an inference from the fact that a witness was not called.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Valley National Bank
See, e.g., United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 699-701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); Odmark v. Westside Bancorporation, Inc., 636 F.Supp. 552, 555-56 (W.D.Wash.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oldenburg
See also United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 691 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986) (proof of “invariable” office custom not required); but see United States v. Burks, 867 F.2d 795, 797 (3d Cir.1989) (evidence found insufficient where office procedure was use of mails “most” or “99%” of the time, with some exceptions).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. Ferrey
See also United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 696 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael J. Guinan
For, while “the hearsay rules and the Confrontation Clause ... ‘stem from the same root,’ ... the two are not equivalent.” Vretta, 790 F.2d at 660 (quoting Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 86 , 91 S.Ct. 210, 218 , 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970)); see also, United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 695 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cannon v. Loyola University of Chicago
See also Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co., 775 F.2d 1030, 1034-36 (9th Cir.1985) (although district court lacks jurisdiction to issue injunction against repetitive litigation once it has dismissed complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, it retains jurisdiction to issue injunction if dismissal was for res judicata), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 767 (1986).
Keplinger
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-1880.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1986.
Cited by 103 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.