green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.8 score
“in view of the holding in wilson, 42 u.s.c. 1983 actions in idaho must now meet the two-year idaho statute of limitations for personal injury actions”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Walker v. Maruffi
(2×)
in view of the holding in wilson, 42 u.s.c. 1983 actions in idaho must now meet the two-year idaho statute of limitations for personal injury actions
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Philadelphia Detention Center
“The Rule 50(b) motion may consider only specific grounds asserted in the motion for a directed verdict.” Orlando v. Billcon Int’l, Inc., 822 F.2d 1294 , 1298 (3d Cir.1987); see Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 752 F.2d 802, 814 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); Abraham v. Pekarski, 728 F.2d 167, 172 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1242 , 104 S.Ct. 3513 , 82 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984); Mallick v. International Bhd. of Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anserphone, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
See 15 U.S.C. § 15 . *426 “To survive a summary judgment motion on its Sherman Act § 2 monopolization claim, [plaintiff must] show that (1) [defendants] possessed monopoly power in the relevant market, and that (2) [defendants] willfully acquired and maintained monopoly power and did not acquire its monopoly share due to ‘growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historical accident.’ ” Ideal Dairy, 90 F.3d at 749 (quoting Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp., 752 F.2d 802, 808 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 328…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Veilleux
See United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.) (government's breach of promise not to prosecute may warrant dismissal of indictment or "other appropriate relief”), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); United States v. Rodman, 519 F.2d 1058 (1st Cir.1975) (approving dismissal of indictment when SEC breached agreement to make no prosecution recommendation in exchange for defendant's cooperation); In re Snoonian, 502 F.2d 110 (1st Cir.1974) (government’s breach of promise not to prosecute would give rise to estoppel) (citing Santobello v. New York, 4…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William George Smith
(2×)
See United States v. DeRosa, 783 F.2d 1401, 1405 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nevius
Under section 1001, “the test for materiality is whether the false statement has a tendency to influence or is capablé of influencing a federal agency.” Brack, 747 F.2d at 1147 ; see United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1326 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908, 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zenon Hernandez
(2×)
See United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir.) (when suspect answered police officer’s questions in English before they were translated, district court could find that he intelligently waived Miranda rights), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908, 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
ca6 1990
See Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aulminum & Chemical Corp., 752 F.2d 802 , 814 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin Ashley
As the Supreme Court has stated, sections 2518(l)(c) and 2518(3)(c) are “simply designed to assure that wiretapping is not resorted to in situations where traditional investigative techniques would suffice to expose the crime.” United States v. Kahn, 415 U.S. at 153 n. 12, 94 S.Ct. at 983 n. 12; accord, United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 11 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roberto MacEo
(2×)
See United States v. De Rosa, 783 F.2d 1401, 1405 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kent Clark v. Michael O'Leary and Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Respondents
See United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191, 1216-1217 (7th Cir.1985) (no abuse of discretion to limit cross-examination of government agent witness’ knowledge of collateral matters and undisclosed information in highly sensitive telex sealed by trial court), certiorari denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 573 ; United States v. Muelbl, 739 F.2d at 1184-1185 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. William A. Kilpatrick, Declan J. O'donnell, Sheila C. Lerner, the Bank of Nova Scotia, Michael Alberga, C.S. Gill, and C.M. Smith
(3×)
See United States v. De Rosa, 783 F.2d 1401, 1404 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986); United States v. McClintock, 748 F.2d 1278, 1283 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 75 , 88 L.Ed.2d 61 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William W. Lilly
See *311 id.; see also United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.) (remanding for evidentiary hearing because sufficient threshold showing was made), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kowalski v. Gagne
See Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1); see also United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 8-9 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); Bryant v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 672 F.2d 217, 220 (1st Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca1 1990
See Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1); see also United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 8-9 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); Bryant v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 672 F.2d 217, 220 (1st Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bottoms v. United States Postal Service
(2×)
See also Camacho v. Ritz-Carlton Water Tower, 786 F.2d 242 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986); Taylor v. Belger Cartage Service, Inc., 762 F.2d 665 (8th Cir.1985); Findley v. Jones Motor Freight, Division Allegheny Corp., 639 F.2d 953 (3rd Cir.1981); Coe v. United Rubber Workers of America, 571 F.2d 1349 (5th Cir.1978). .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vito Spillone, United States of America v. John Clyde Abel, United States of America v. Frank Citro
(4×)
Compare United States v. Benjamin, 852 F.2d 413, 415 (9th Cir.1988) (de novo review) and United States v. De Rosa, 783 F.2d 1401, 1404 (9th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986) with United States v. Gonzalez, 800 F.2d 895, 899 (9th Cir.1986) (abuse of discretion standard of review) and United States v. Noti, 731 F.2d 610, 613 (9th Cir.1984) (same). 2 We hold the de novo standard is the appropriate one.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene Robert Wallach, A/K/A \E. Robert (Bob) Wallach\"
See In re Subpoena of Persico, 522 F.2d 41, 63 (2 Cir.1975) (technical provisions in special prosecutor statutes are intended to protect the government, not to limit the power to prosecute); see also United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191, 1208-09 (7 Cir.1985) ("[T]here is no evidence that Congress intended [certain technical provisions of the Judicial Code] as safeguards for the benefit of those whose indictment might be sought”.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 [ 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 573 ] (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary Nerlinger and Robert Varipapa
See 4 Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 801(d)(2)(E)[01], at 801-248-49 (1988); see also United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 8 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard D. Fritz Leonard Levy and Robert L. Boynton
(2×)
Compare United States v. Gonzalez, 800 F.2d 895, 899 (9th Cir.1986) (standard is abuse of discretion) with United States v. De Rosa, 783 F.2d 1401, 1404 (9th Cir.) (standard is de novo), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Legg v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union 364
(2×)
United Independent Flight Officers v. United Airlines, 756 F.2d 1274 (7th Cir.1985), citing Hoffman v. Lanza, Inc., 658 F.2d 519, 522 (7th Cir.1981); see also Camacho v. Ritz-Carlton Water Tower, 786 F.2d 242 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986); Dober v. Roadway Express, Inc., 707 F.2d 292, 294 (7th Cir.1983); Adams v. The Bud Company, 846 F.2d 428 (7th Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edgardo Giorgi, United States of America v. Gilberto Ocasio-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. De Rosa, 783 F.2d 1401, 1406 (9th Cir.) (“even if the prosecutor’s actions constituted misconduct, an appellant must demonstrate a reasonable inference of bias on the part of the grand jury resulting from those actions.”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William F. Shriver
See, e.g., United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1329 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986) (misappropriation of funds by use of youth organization's credit card for personal purposes admissible to show defendant's intent, and is similar to charge of defrauding the organization in a furniture leasing arrangement). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gouker v. Murphy Motor Freight, Inc.
(2×)
United Independent Flight Officers v. United Airlines, 756 F.2d 1274 (7th Cir.1985), citing Hoffman v. Lonza, Inc., 658 F.2d 519, 522 (7th Cir.1981); see also Camacho v. Ritz-Carlton Water Tower, 786 F.2d 242 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 477 U.S. 908, 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986); Dober v. Roadway Express, Inc., 707 F.2d 292, 294 (7th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Garner
Under the plain error doctrine, we must search for "an actual miscarriage of justice, which implies the conviction of one who but for the error would have been acquitted." United States v. Silverstein, 732 F.2d 1338, 1349 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 792 , 83 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985); see also United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1328 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986). 101 The defendant argues that he had not raised the issue of the Wagner & Sons notebook in his argument, and that the issue of intent, to which the prosecut…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Garner
Under the plain error doctrine, we must search for “an actual miscarriage of justice, which implies the conviction of one who but for the error would have been acquitted.” United States v. Silverstein, 732 F.2d 1338, 1349 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 792 , 83 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985); see also United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1328 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Russell v. Municipality of Anchorage
See also Henderson v. State, 110 Idaho 308 , 715 P.2d 978 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986). 11 .Bookman, 657 P.2d at 830-31 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. James v. Scot Lad Foods
See, e.g., Camacho v. Ritz-Carlton Water Tower, 786 F.2d 242 , 244 (7th Cir.) (“[A union] is not liable ... for careless or boneheaded conduct”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3282 , 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986); Hoffman v. Lonza, Inc., 658 F.2d 519, 522 (7th Cir. 1981).
Camacho
v.
Ritz-Carlton Water Tower
v.
Ritz-Carlton Water Tower
No. 85-6862.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: New Mexico Court of Appeals (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.