Patel v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., 474 U.S. 947 (1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Patel v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., 474 U.S. 947 (1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[s]hareholder derivative actions are governed by Rule 23.1 ..., and federal courts apply the law of the state in which the company is incorporated”
64 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: West v. West (gand, 1992-09-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) West v. West
N.D. Ga. · 1992 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
hareholder derivative actions are governed by rule 23.1 ..., and federal courts apply the law of the state in which the company is incorporated
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Guzikowski v. Kuehl
Wis. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
law of the case doctrine does not prevent a trial court from retrying an issue if evidence on a subsequent trial is substantially different or if controlling authority has been modified.
discussed Cited "see" H.R. McArthur v. A.A. Green & Co. of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
Paddock v. Bay Concrete Indus., Inc., 154 So.2d 313, 315-16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); see American Medical Int’l, Inc. v. Scheller, 462 So.2d 1, 7-8 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), rev. denied, 471 So.2d 44 (Fla.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 947 , 106 S.Ct. 345 , 88 L.Ed.2d 292 (1985); see also Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Stevens, 425 F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir.1970).
discussed Cited "see" McArthur v. AA GREEN & CO. OF FLA.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
Paddock v. Bay Concrete Indus., Inc., 154 So.2d 313, 315-16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); see American Medical Int'l, Inc. v. Scheller, 462 So.2d 1, 7-8 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), rev. denied, 471 So.2d 44 (Fla.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 947 , 106 S.Ct. 345 , 88 L.Ed.2d 292 (1985); see also Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Stevens, 425 F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir.1970).
cited Cited "see" AIU Insurance v. Superintendent of Insurance
Me. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Maines v. Secretary of State, 493 A.2d 326 (Me.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 947 , 106 S.Ct. 345 , 88 L.Ed.2d 291 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" Maryland National Bank v. Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. (In Re Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc.)
Bankr. W.D. Pa. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 798, 801 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 947 , 106 S.Ct. 344 , 88 L.Ed.2d 291 (1985) (concerning ripeness, balancing the need for decision as a “function of the probability and importance of the anticipated injury” with the risks of decision “measured by the difficulty and sensitivity of the issues presented” and the necessity of further factual development) (quoting WRIGHT, MILLER & COOPER, 13A Federal Practice and Procedure, § 3532.1, at 114.
discussed Cited "see" George A. Daniel v. Steve Norris Board of Pardons & Paroles Ned Ray McWherter
6th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 798, 801 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 947 (1985); Young v. Klutznick, 652 F.2d 617, 625-26 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 939 (1982); Wright v. Trammel, 810 F.2d 589 (6th Cir.1987). 9 Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. * The Honorable Frank J.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hoffer v. American Education Services (In Re Hoffer)
Bankr. S.D. Ohio · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 798, 801 (6th Cir.[1985]) (“ripeness doctrine ... requires that the court exercise its discretion to determine if judicial resolution would be desirable under all of the circumstances”), cer t. denied, 474 U.S. 947 , 106 S.Ct. 344 , 88 L.Ed.2d 291 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Rifle Association Of America v. Magaw
6th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 798, 801 (6th Cir.) ("ripeness doctrine ... requires that the court exercise its discretion to determine if judicial resolution would be desirable under all of the circumstances"), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 947 , 106 S.Ct. 344 , 88 L.Ed.2d 291 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Rifle Ass'n of America v. Magaw
6th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 798, 801 (6th Cir.) (“ripeness doctrine ... requires that the court exercise its discretion to determine if judicial resolution would be desirable under all of the circumstances”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 947 , 106 S.Ct. 344 , 88 L.Ed.2d 291 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. v. Jdc (America) Corp.
11th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Thornton v. Bean Contracting Co., 592 F.2d 1287, 1290 (5th Cir.1979); see also In re Stratford, 635 F.2d 365 , 368 (5th Cir.1981) (“[T]he determination of the parties’ intent from extrinsic evidence is a question of fact rather than one of law.”). 10 Such an ambiguity, however, “does not exist merely because a contract can possibly be interpreted in more than one manner.” Shipner v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 868 F.2d 401, 409 (11th Cir.1989) (applying Florida law) (citing American Medical Int’l, Inc. v. Scheller, 462 So.2d 1, 7 (Fla. 4th Dist.Ct.App.1984), review denied, 471 So.2d 4…
Patel
v.
Flying Tiger Line, Inc.
No. 85-381.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 1985.
474 U.S. 947
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: N.D. Georgia (1) · Court of Appeals of Wisconsin (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.