green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Zwitserse Maatschappij van Levensverzekering en Lijfrente v. ABN International Capital Markets Corp.
See Sweater Bee By Banff, Ltd. v. Manhattan Indus., 754 F.2d 457, 461 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Zwitserse Maatschappij Van Levensverzekering En Lijfrente v. Abn International Capital Markets Corporation
See Sweater Bee By Banff, Ltd. v. Manhattan Indus., 754 F.2d 457, 461 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
DiCrisci v. Lyndon Guaranty Bank of New York
See Sweater Bee by Banff, Ltd. v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 754 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.) (defendants did not waive right to compel arbitration by participating in discovery for two years and by filing motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), since they had previously asserted arbitration as a defense in their answer), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Association of American Railroads v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia
See generally Illinois Commerce Com’n v. I.C.C., 749 F.2d 875 , 877 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 70 , 88 L.Ed.2d 57 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Integrity Management International, Inc. v. Tombs & Sons, Inc.
See Grocery Mfrs. of America v. Gerace, 755 F.2d 993 (2d Cir.1985) (finding preemption where state statute in direct conflict with valid federal regulation), aff'd, 474 U.S. 801 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 69 , 88 L.Ed.2d 56 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Integrity Management International, Inc. v. Tombs & Sons, Inc.
See Grocery Mfrs. of America v. Gerace, 755 F.2d 993 (2d Cir.1985) (finding preemption where state statute in direct conflict with valid federal regulation), aff'd, 474 U.S. 801 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 69 , 88 L.Ed.2d 56 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zola W. Rittenhouse v. Edward H. Mabry, Jr.
See Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund v. Cooley, 462 So.2d 696 (Miss.1984) (discussing attachment basis of jurisdiction), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 70 , 88 L.Ed.2d 57 (1985); Gough v. Mabsco, Inc., 335 So.2d 910, 911 (Miss.1976) (attachment case).
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. United States
See Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 749 F.2d 1020, 1024 (3d Cir.1984) (stating that the policy of Sec. 1961 is "compensation of the wronged party for loss of the use of money"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985); Note, Interest on Judgments in the Federal Courts, 64 Yale L.J. 1019 , 1019 (1955); see also S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. United States
See Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 749 F.2d 1020, 1024 (3d Cir.1984) (stating that the policy of § 1961 is “compensation of the wronged party for loss of the use of money”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985); Note, Interest on Judgments in the Federal Courts, 64 Yale L.J. 1019 ,1019 (1955); see also S.Rep.
cited
Cited "see"
Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
See — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Becker v. Silverman
Carcich v. Rederi A/B Nordie, 389 F.2d 692, 696 (2d Cir.1968); see Sweater Bee By Banff, Ltd. v. Manhattan Inds., 754 F.2d 457, 466 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985); Lubrizol Int’l, S.A. v. M/V Stolt Argobay, 562 F.Supp. 565, 572-73 (S.D.N.Y.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Miller v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc., David Sullivan, Elliot Varon v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc., David Sullivan, Clint Ramsden v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc., David Sullivan
See Sweater Bee By Banff v. Manhattan Industries, 754 F.2d 457 , 460 n. 2 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985); Langley v. Colonial Leasing Co., 707 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir.1983). 6 This result derives from the much maligned but still controlling Enelow-Ettelson doctrine, 3 which holds that in actions at law, an order granting or denying a stay based on an "equitable defense" is immediately appealable as an order granting or denying an injunction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.
See Sweater Bee By Banff v. Manhattan Industries, 754 F.2d 457 , 460 n. 2 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985); Langley v. Colonial Leasing Co., 707 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Natural Gas Company, Cross-Appellee v. Pursue Energy, Cross-Appellant
Harrison Overseas Corp. v. American Barge Sun Coaster, 475 F.2d 504, 507 (5th Cir.1973); see Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 749 F.2d 1020 , 1024 & n. 6 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Brener v. Becker Paribas Inc.
See Sweater Bee By Banff, Ltd v. Manhattan Inds., Inc., 754 F.2d 457, 466 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985); Martin Marietta Aluminum, Inc. v. General Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burns v. Imagine Films Entertainment, Inc.
See also Rush v. Oppenheimer & Co., 779 F.2d 885, 887 (2d Cir.1985) (citing Sweater Bee By Banff, Ltd. v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., 754 F.2d 457, 461 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985)) (the litigation of substantial issues going to the merits of the suit may constitute a waiver of arbitration).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Air Separation, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Costs of the loss of use of a money judgment should not be borne by the injured plaintiff, but by the "defendant whose initial wrongful conduct invoked the judicial process and who has had the use of the money judgment throughout the period of delay." Perkins, 487 F.2d at 676 ; see also Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 577 F.Supp. 429, 433 (D.Del.1983) (reasoning that because money has time value, the only way to make a party whole is to award interest from the time the party should have received the money."), aff'd, 749 F.2d 1020 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 68 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Air Separation, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Costs of the loss of use of a money judgment should not be borne by the injured plaintiff, but by the “defendant whose initial wrongful conduct invoked the judicial process and who has had the use of the money judgment throughout the period of delay.” Perkins, 487 F.2d at 676 ; see also Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 577 F.Supp. 429, 433 (D.Del.1983) (reasoning that because money has time value, the only way to make a party whole is to award interest from the time the party should have received the money.”), aff'd, 749 F.2d 1020 (3d Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glaxo Operations Uk Limited v. Donald J. Quigg, Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
Compare Illinois Commerce Comm’n v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 749 F.2d 875 , 881 (D.C.Cir.1984) (final agency interpretation of statute two years after being passed not considered contemporaneous), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 70 , 88 L.Ed.2d 57 (1985), with Zenith Radio Corp. v. United States, 437 U.S. 443, 450 , 98 S.Ct. 2441, 2445 , 57 L.Ed.2d 337 (1978) (deference accorded agency interpretation formed within one year of statute’s enactment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marlin Oil Corp. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.
Cone, 460 U.S. at 24 , 103 S.Ct. at 941 ; see, e.g., Sweater Bee v. Manhattan Industries, 754 F.2d 457, 461, 466 (2d Cir.), cert. den., 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 68 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55 (1985); Hart, 453 F.2d at 1360 ; cf. In re Mercury Construc.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Illinois Commerce Commission and Patrick W. Simmons v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Association of American Railroads, Rails to Trails Conservancy, and Iowa Trails Council, Intervenors. Commissioner of Transportation of the State of New York v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Rails to Trails Conservancy, Iowa Trails Council, and Conservation Federation of Maryland v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
Congress believed that "the Commission is more capable through the administrative process of examining specific regulatory provisions and practices not yet addressed by Congress to determine where they can be deregulated consistent with the policies of Congress." Id.; see also Illinois Commerce Comm'n v. ICC, 749 F.2d 875, 885 (D.C.Cir.1984) (deregulation through exemption process overriding purpose of Act), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 70 , 88 L.Ed.2d 57 (1985); Coal Exporters Ass'n v. United States, 745 F.2d 76, 82 (D.C.Cir.1984) (exemption provision intended to give ICC very broad…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Illinois Commerce Commission v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Congress believed that "the Commission is more capable through the administrative process of'examining specific regulatory provisions and practices not yet addressed by Congress to determine where they can be deregulated consistent with the policies of Congress." Id.; see also Illinois Commerce Comm’n v. ICC, 749 F.2d 875 , 885 (D.C.Cir.1984) (deregulation through exemption process overriding purpose of Act), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 70 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 57 (1985); Coal Exporters Ass’n v. United States, 745 F.2d 76, 82 (D.C.Cir.1984) (exemption provision intended to give ICC very…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clois Osburn and Anita Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., Rachelle Laboratories, Inc.
See also Grocery Mfrs. of America, Inc. v. Gerace, 755 F.2d 993 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 69 , 88 L.Ed.2d 56 (1985); Cosmetic Toiletry & Fragrance Ass'n v. State of Minnesota, 440 F.Supp. 1216 (D.Minn.1977), aff'd, 575 F.2d 1256 (8th Cir.1978). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Collins
v.
Anndep Steamship Corp.
v.
Anndep Steamship Corp.
No. 84-1798.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.