green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Robinson
See Allen v. Allen, 484 So.2d 269 (La.App.3rd Cir.1986), writ denied, 488 So.2d 199 (La.1986), U.S. cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986) (“Rights to retirement benefits accrue continuously throughout the husband’s period of service, and the wife’s entitlement to those benefits should be determined under the law of the States in which the parties were domiciled for the respective periods during which |Rretirement benefits accrued”); Little v. Little, 513 So.2d 464, 471 (La.App.2nd Cir.1987) (“...a portion of the military retirement pay, which a former hus…
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Astra U.S.A., Inc.
See Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1044-45 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Wagner v. Nutrasweet Co.
See Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1043-44 (6th Cir.) (en banc) cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986). 13 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis S. Leavitt v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company
See Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1043 (6th Cir.) (ADEA case), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Lantech, Inc. v. Kaufman Company of Ohio, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
See Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 789 F.2d 1556, 1558 , 229 USPQ 561, 563 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 178 (1986). 10 C.
cited
Cited "see"
Ortloff Corp. v. Gulsby Engineering, Inc.
See generally Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 789 F.2d 1556, 1557 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986). 29.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mechanical Plastics Corp. v. Unifast Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
See Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 789 F.2d 1556, 1573-74 , 229 USPQ 561, 574 (Fed.Cir.) (finding on infringement is question of fact subject to clearly erroneous standard of review), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 178 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cosmair, Inc., L'OreaL Hair Care Division
See Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1045 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James J. Nicholson v. Cpc International Inc., a Corporation, and James R. Eiszner
(2×)
Compare Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1045 (6th Cir.) (substantive waivers judged under standard contract principles), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Coventry v. United States Steel Corporation
See, e.g., Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir.) (en banc) (there is not an absolute bar to release of claims under the ADEA despite similarities between that act and the Fair Labor Standards Act, for which there is an absolute bar against the waiver of claims), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986); Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coventry v. United States Steel Corp.
See, e.g., Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir.) (en banc) (there is not an absolute bar to release of claims under the ADEA despite similarities between that act and the Fair Labor Standards Act, for which there is an absolute bar against the waiver of claims), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986); Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co., 809 F.2d 539 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 3212 , 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co.
Moore v. McGraw Edison Co., 804 F.2d 1026, 1033 (8th Cir.1986); see also Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 178 , 95 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986); 50 Fed.Reg. 40,870-71 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eastman Kodak Co.
v.
Polaroid Corp.
v.
Polaroid Corp.
No. 86-96.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.