green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.4 score
“the grave invasion of the most fundamental of all personal liberties that occurs when preventive detention is ordered”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gatto
the grave invasion of the most fundamental of all personal liberties that occurs when preventive detention is ordered
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gatto
the grave invasion of the most fundamental of all personal liberties that occurs when preventive detention is ordered
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State of New Jersey v. Amed Ingram
See also United States v. Perry, 788 F.2d 100, 104 (3d Cir.) (noting the lack of a standard of review in the Federal Act), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 864 , 107 S. Ct. 218 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. FERNANDO A.
(2×)
Of course, an order of preventive detention results in physical confinement, a condition aptly characterized as "the ultimate deprivation of liberty"; United States v. Melendez-Carrion, 790 F.2d 984, 998 (2d Cir.) (Newman, J.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 978 , 107 S.Ct. 562 , 93 L.Ed.2d 568 (1986); see also United States v. Perry, 788 F.2d 100, 113 (3d Cir.) ("civil detention order results in the deprivation of the most fundamental of all personal liberties"), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 864 , 107 S.Ct. 218 , 93 L.Ed.2d 146 (1986); whereas the protective order issued in the present case merely barre…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Notarantonio v. Notarantonio
A trial justice need not “categorically accept or reject each piece of evidence in his decision for this Court to uphold it because implicit in the trial justices decision are sufficient findings of fact to support his rulings.” Narragansett Electric Co. v. Carbone, 898 A.2d 87, 102 (R.I.2006); see also Mattera v. Mattera, 669 A.2d 538, 541 (R.I.1996) (“This Court has held that even in the event that ‘a trial justice fails to expressly articulate findings of fact we shall not refuse to accord the decision the persuasive force usually accorded such decisions on review, for the reason th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. State
See also Illinois v. Vilt, 119 Ill.App.3d 832 , 75 Ill.Dec. 346 , 457 N.E.2d 136 (1983), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 864 , 107 S.Ct. 219 , 93 L.Ed.2d 148 (1986)(when trial judge orally allowed defendant’s motion for directed verdict, then immediately reversed itself, there was no double jeopardy); Michigan v. Vincent, 455 Mich. 110 , 565 N.W.2d 629 (1997)(trial court’s “inchoate impressions [regarding motion for direct verdict] did not mature into a final judgment of acquittal on the charge” so that defendant’s “right not to be placed twice in jeopardy was not violated”). 5 In Francis…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jack Chilingirian, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
For instance, in Pollard , this Court held that “the Bail Reform Act of 1984 does not violate a *710 defendant’s procedural due process rights by requiring the district court to determine that an appeal raises a substantial issue before granting bond pending appeal.” 778 F.2d at 1182 ; see also United States v. Perry, 788 F.2d 100, 111 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 864 , 107 S.Ct. 218 , 93 L.Ed.2d 146 (1986) (federal courts that have addressed the issue have held that there is no absolute, right to bail); United States v. Portes, 786 F.2d 758, 766 (7th Cir.1985) (neither the historic…
Diaz
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
No. 86-5170.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (2)
App. Ct. III., 2d Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.