green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Duncan v. State
e will not adopt an inflexible rule that allows a party by stipulation to prevent his adversary's case from being presented in its appropriately full and real life context
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donaldson
Accord, United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299, 1309 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986); United States v. Charles, 738 F.2d 686, 692 (5th Cir.1984); United States v. Swanson, 2006 WL 335849 (S.D.Ohio 2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stuemke
Accord, United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299, 1309 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986); United States v. Charles, 738 F.2d 686, 692 (5th Cir.1984); United States v. Swanson, 2006 WL 335849 (S.D.Ohio 2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McNally
Accord, United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299, 1309 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986); United States v. Charles, 738 F.2d 686, 692 (5th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Newton
Accord, United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299, 1309 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986); United States v. Charles, 738 F.2d 686, 692 (5th Cir. 1984). 9 For reasons which follow, the Court concludes that the Defendant has failed to meet his burden in that regard.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peraita v. State
See United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299, 1305 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986) (`[w]e will not *1194 adopt an inflexible rule that allows a party by stipulation to prevent his adversary's case from being presented in its appropriately full and real life context').
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorn v. United States
See Artis v. United States, 505 A.2d 52, 58 (D.C.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986) (holding that it was not error to continue polling on counts not subject to dissent when there was a multi-count indictment); Johnson v. United States, 470 A.2d 756, 760 (D.C.1983) (affirming a conviction because “unspoken communicative factors play[ed] a large role” in understanding what a juror meant when she said, “Guilty, I guess”); Ellis v. United States, 395 A.2d 404, 408 (D.C.1978), ce rt. denied, 442 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 2830 , 61 L.Ed.2d 280 (1979) (holding tha…
discussed
Cited "see"
McCart v. State
See United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299, 1305 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986) (`[w]e will not adopt an inflexible rule that allows a party by stipulation to prevent his adversary's case from being presented in its appropriately full and real life context').
cited
Cited "see"
Lupo v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories
See United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299, 1304 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107, S.Ct. 464, 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Lupo v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories
See generally United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299, 1304 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986). 35 .
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Zamora
(2×)
See United States v. Davis, 749 F.2d 292 (5th Cir.1985), cert denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986); People v. Carlson, 677 P.2d 310 (Colo.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elliott v. United States
See Artis v. United States, 505 A.2d 52, 58 (D.C.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986) (coercive potential minimal where juror not isolated as sole dissenter and jury split not revealed); see also Crowder, supra, 383 A.2d at 343 (coercive potential greater where twelfth juror revealed as lone dissenter).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mckinney v. Rees
See Artis v. United States, 505 A.2d 52, 56 (D.C.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986); Anonymous v. State, 507 So.2d 972, 973-74 (Ala.1987); State v. Holliday, 159 Conn. 169 , 268 A.2d 368, 369 (1970); Brown v. State, 197 Ga.App. 155 , 398 S.E.2d 34, 34 (1990); People v. Kannapes, 208 Ill.App.3d 400 , 153 Ill.Dec. 419, 421-22 , 567 N.E.2d 377, 379-80 (1990); Penley v. State, 506 N.E.2d 806, 808 (Ind.1987); Ross v. State, 276 Md. 664 , 350 A.2d 680, 684 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chalifoux, 362 Mass. 811 , 291 N.E.2d 635, 638 (1973); State v. Clark, 801 S.W…
discussed
Cited "see"
McKinney v. Rees
See Artis v. United States, 505 A.2d 52, 56 (D.C.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986); Anonymous v. State, 507 So.2d 972, 973-74 (Ala.1987); State v. Holliday, 159 Conn. 169 , 268 A.2d 368, 369 (1970); Brown v. State, 197 Ga.App. 155 , 398 S.E.2d 34, 34 (1990); People v. Kannapes, 208 Ill.App.3d 400 , 153 Ill.Dec. 419, 421-22 , 567 N.E.2d 377, 379-80 (1990); Penley v. State, 506 N.E.2d 806, 808 (Ind.1987); Ross v. State, 276 Md. 664 , 350 A.2d 680, 684 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chalifoux, 362 Mass. 811 , 291 N.E.2d 635, 638 (1973); State v. Clark, 801 S.W…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jacob
See, United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S. Ct. 464 , 93 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Acosta-Acevedo
See United States v. Davis, 792 F.2d 1299, 1304-05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lumpkin v. United States
(2×)
See Artis v. United States, 505 A.2d 52, 58 (D.C.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 464 , 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986). [3] Austin suggests that this is not a plain error case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edwards v. State
See also Rodrigues v. Gudeman, 794 F.2d 1458 , 1460 n.2 (9th Cir. 1986)(“A person committed because he is insane is not being ‘punished’ for a crime.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 (1986); Hubbart v. Superior Court, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 268 , 286 (Cal. App. 6 Dist. 1996)(“[I]t would be singularly inappropriate to apply double jeopardy provisions to these types of proceedings [commitment under the Sexually Violent Predators Act] where the issue to be determined is not whether respondent committed an act or offense, but whether respondent suffers from a mental condition which makes him danger…
Windsor
v.
Idaho
v.
Idaho
No. 86-5209.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 17, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of A… (1)
Sup. Ct. Idaho. Certio-rari denied.