green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Hughes, Also Known as Jesse Ellebee, Atilano Velasquez, and Martin Leanos
See United States v. Norwood, 798 F.2d 1094, 1098 (7th Cir.), certiorari denied, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 S.Ct. 656 , 93 L.Ed.2d 711 (1986) (evidentiary error did not injuriously influence jury’s verdict); United States v. Cerro, 775 F.2d 908, 916 (7th Cir.1985) (reversal is required even if evidence of guilt was overwhelming if the defendant was utterly precluded from defending himself because of the exclusion of evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Medley
See United States v. Heyward, 22 MJ 35 (CMA), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 S.Ct. 656 , 93 L.Ed.2d 710 (1986); United States v. Thompson, 22 MJ 40 (CMA 1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Poulakis v. Amtrak
See United States v. Norwood, 798 F.2d 1094, 1097, n. 4 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 S.Ct. 656 , 93 L.Ed.2d 711 (1986) (out-of-court statement offered to establish its effect upon listener, rather than its truth, does not differ from any other out-of-court event about which witness might testify); Donohoe v. Consolidated Operating & Production Corp., 736 F.Supp. 845, 859 (N.D.Ill.1990) (where out-of-court statements are offered only as related to listener’s state of mind, declarant’s veracity is irrelevant and rationale for excluding hearsay becomes inapposite); cf. MCI Co…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sievers
See United States v. Heyward, 22 MJ 35 (CMA), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 S.Ct. 656 , 93 L.Ed.2d 710 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackie Donnell Hollingsworth
See United States v. Norwood, 798 F.2d 1094, 1100-1101 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 (1986). 7 We think Hollingsworth has stated a claim of deficient attorney conduct under these standards.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes v. Judd
Hill illustrates this category, also: See, e.g., Shabazz v. Barnauskas, 790 F.2d 1536, 1538 (11th Cir.1986) (per cu-riam) (state inmate’s “ ‘pseudofolliculitis’ or ‘shaving bumps,’ ” even if shaving required by prison officials when physician ordered otherwise, “does not rise to. the level of the cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth Amendment”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 S.Ct. 655 , 93 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986); Dickson v. Colman, 569 F.2d 1310, 1311 (5th Cir.1978) (per curiam) (county inmate’s high blood pressure presented “ ‘no true danger’ or ‘se…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Woodward East Project, Inc., Debtors. Edith Woodberry v. David Allard, Trustee Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.
Exch., Inc., 831 F.2d 1339 , 1345 (7th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 (1988) (The alter ego theory "may be asserted by any creditor without regard to the specific nature of his relationship with the corporation and its alleged alter ego.); see also In re Kaiser, 791 F.2d 73, 76 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 (1986); Halverson v. Schuster (In re Schuster), 132 B.R. 604, 609 (Bankr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hill v. Dekalb Regional Youth Detention Center
See, e.g., Shabazz v. Bamauskas, 790 F.2d 1536, 1538 (11th Cir.) (per curiam) (state inmate’s " 'pseudofolliculitis’ or 'shaving bumps,''' even if shaving required by prison officials when physician ordered otherwise, "does not rise to the level of the cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth Amendment”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 S.Ct. 655 , 93 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986); Dickson v. Colman, 569 F.2d 1310, 1311 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (county inmate's high blood pressure presented " 'no true danger' or 'serious threat’ to his health,” and he also had full range of motion …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca11 1994
Hewett v. Jarrard, 786 F.2d 1080, 1086-87 (11th Cir.1986) (three-day delay in medical treatment for shoulder injury was " 'reckless disregard' " for detainee's serious medical need and was a constitutional violation); Ancata v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 769 F.2d 700 , 702 (11th Cir.1985) (valid constitutional claim where inmate died of leukemia four months after complaining of "serious" medical problems, including swollen ankles, inability to sleep, chills, hyperventilation, severe pain in back and right leg, and double vision, and county jail defendants made no arrangements for a doctor's e…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clinical Leasing Service, Inc., Melvin Soll and Leroy T. Brinkley
See, e.g., Matter of Kaiser, 791 F.2d 73, 75 (7th Cir.) (“The rules under which the corporate veil may be pierced go-by many names, ... such as alter ego and equitable estoppel." (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 S.Ct. 655 , 93 L.Ed.2d 710 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Datz v. Hutson
See also Shabazz v. Barnauskas, 790 F.2d 1536, 1538 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 S.Ct. 655 , 93 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986); Brown v. Hughes, 894 F.2d 1533 , 1538 n. 4 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 928 , 110 S.Ct. 2624 , 110 L.Ed.2d 645 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Lumpkin v. Envirodyne Industries, Inc.
App.3d 999, 1004 , 47 Ill.Dec. 555, 558-59 , 415 N.E.2d 560, 563-564 (1980); see also In re Kaiser, 791 F.2d 73, 75 (7th Cir.1986) (permitting alter ego claims whenever reliance on the corporate form would “defeat some strong equitable claim”), certiorari denied, Wise v. Kaiser, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 *463 S.Ct. 655, 93 L.Ed.2d 710 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. Ashford
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Norwood, 798 F.2d 1094, 1096 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 (1986); United States v. Turquitt, 557 F.2d 464 , 470 n. 10 (5th Cir.1977).
Ashley
v.
Armstrong, Controller of the Colorado Department of Labor
v.
Armstrong, Controller of the Colorado Department of Labor
No. 86-5710.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1986.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.