green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
“once plaintiffs took the depositions, it would be reasonably necessary for defendants to obtain a copy of the transcript.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Williams v. McDonough
once plaintiffs took the depositions, it would be reasonably necessary for defendants to obtain a copy of the transcript.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sanchez
See State v. Diorio, 12 Conn. App. 74, 76-77 , 529 A.2d 1320 , cert. denied, 205 Conn. 813 , 532 A.2d587 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S. Ct. 1025 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Haynes v. GASOLINE MARKETERS, INC.
See Morrison v. Genuine Parts Co., 828 F.2d 708 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1025 , 98 L.Ed.2d 990 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Christian v. City of Dallas
See United States v. Burzynski Cancer Research Inst., 819 F.2d 1301 , 1310 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1026 , 98 L.Ed.2d 990 (1988). *627 In this case, viewing the facts and drawing inferences most favorably for Plaintiff, Defendant Bennie Click is entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chacko v. Texas a & M University
See United States v. Burzynski Cancer Research Inst., 819 F.2d 1301 , 1310 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1026 , 98 L.Ed.2d 990 (1988); Saldana v. Garza, 684 F.2d 1159, 1163 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1012 , 103 S.Ct. 1253 , 75 L.Ed.2d 481 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Agnes VERA-LOZANO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING, Defendant-Appellant
See Marshall v. Perez Arzuaga, 828 F.2d 845, 849 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, Avis Rent-A-Car of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Marshall, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1027 , 98 L.Ed.2d 991 (1988); LaForest v. Autoridad de las Fuentes Fluviales de P.R., 536 F.2d 443, 446 (1st Cir.1976); see also Byrd v. Blue Ridge Cooperative, 356 U.S. 525, 536-40 , 78 S.Ct. 893, 900-02 , 2 L.Ed.2d 953 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Waldorf v. Borough of Kenilworth
See, Wheeler, at 1098. (citing Morrison v. Genuine Parts Co., 828 F.2d 708 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1025 , 98 L.Ed.2d 990 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lozano v. International
See Marshall v. P rez Arzuaga, 828 F.2d 845 , 849 ___ ________ _____________ (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied, Avis Rent-A-Car of Puerto Rico, _____ ______ _________________________________ Inc. v. Marshall, 484 U.S. 1065 (1988); LaForest v. Autoridad de ____ ________ ________ ____________ las Fuentes Fluviales de P.R., 536 F.2d 443, 446 (1st Cir. 1976); _____________________________ see also Byrd v. Blue Ridge Cooperative, 356 U.S. 525 , 536-40 ___ ____ ____ _______________________ (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lozano v. International
See Marshall v. P rez Arzuaga, 828 F.2d 845, 849 (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied, Avis Rent-A-Car of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Marshall, 484 U.S. 1065 (1988); LaForest v. Autoridad de las Fuentes Fluviales de P.R., 536 F.2d 443, 446 (1st Cir. 1976); see also Byrd v. Blue Ridge Cooperative, 356 U.S. 525, 536-40 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trustees of the Northwest Laundry and Dry Cleaners Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Stanislaw R. Burzynski
See United States v. Burzynski Cancer Research Inst., 819 F.2d 1301 , 1315 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 829 F.2d 1124 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1026 , 98 L.Ed.2d 990 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Logan v. United States
See United States v. Burzynski Cancer Research Institute, 819 F.2d 1301 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1026 , 98 L.Ed.2d 990 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Crowley v. Fox Broadcasting Co.
See United States v. Burzynski Cancer Research Institute, 819 F.2d 1301 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1026 , 98 L.Ed.2d 990 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Nelson M. Blohm and Joann M. Blohm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Morrison v. Genuine Parts Co., 828 F.2d 708 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1025 , 98 L.Ed.2d 990 (1988); Wheeler v. John Deere Co., 935 F.2d 1090 (10th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Murdick
See State v. Diorio, 12 Conn. App. 74, 78-79 , 529 A.2d 1320 , cert. denied, 205 Conn. 813 , 532 A.2d 587 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S. Ct. 1025 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Lopez ex rel. Lopez v. Torres
Van Ort v. Estate of Stanewich, 92 F.3d 831, 837 (9th Cir.1996); see also Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Cartagena, 882 F.2d 553, 561 (1st Cir.1989) (confirming that in a § 1983 action, a superseding intervening cause that is reasonably foreseeable will not relieve a defendant of liability, but an “ ‘unforeseen and abnormal’ intervention” will break the chain of proximate causation) (quoting Marshall v. Perez Arzuaga, 828 F.2d 845, 848 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1027 , 98 L.Ed.2d 991 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scheduled Airlines Traffic Offices, Inc. v. Objective, Inc.
See id. at 349; Mullen, 195 S.E.2d at 700 (denying-damages for lost profits where “the anticipated profits ... could have been based only on speculation and conjecture”); see also La-Vay Corp. v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Association, 830 F.2d 522, 529 (4th Cir.1987) (“Damages may not be awarded ... where an award would be based on an estimate of lost profits which is speculative.”), cer t. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1027 , 98 L.Ed.2d 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re the Search & Seizure of Shivers
See also United States v. Burzynski Cancer Research Institute, 819 F.2d 1301, 1311 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1026 , 98 L.Ed.2d 990 (1987) (movant failed to show right to lawful possession); United States v. Rangel, 608 F.2d 120, 121 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (same); (3) ARPA conveys no property rights.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Walde
See also LaVay Corp. v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 830 F.2d 522, 527 (4th Cir.1987) (holding one year limitations period of Va.Code § 8.01-248 applies to claims against bank directors for breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and gross negligence), ce rt. denied 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1027 , 98 L.Ed.2d 991 (1988); C-T of Virginia, Inc. v. Barrett, 124 B.R. 689, 693 (W.D.Va.1990) (holding breach of fiduciary duty of corporate officer is tort subject to Va.Code § 8.01-248 one year statute of limitations); RTC v. Everhart, 837 F.Supp. 155, 158 (E.D.Va.1993) (holding one year lim…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seabury Management, Inc. v. Professional Golfers' Ass'n of America, Inc.
See, e.g., LaVay Corp. v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 830 F.2d 522 , 529 (4th Cir.1987) ("Damages may not be awarded ... where an award would be based on an estimate of lost profits which is speculative.”) (citing Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 352 (1979)), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1027 , 98 L.Ed.2d 991 (1988). 23 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bakker v. Grutman
Rule 11 imposes upon substitute counsel a duty to investigate the legal and factual sufficiency of the claims he or she takes up; see Cabell, 810 F.2d at 466 ; Rachel v. Banana Republic, Inc., 831 F.2d 1503, 1508 (9th Cir.1987); but until substitute counsel files some paper indicating an intention to continue prosecution of the suit, such a decision will not be presumed by looking to the complaint itself. 4 See, e.g., Fahrenz v. Meadow Farm Partnership, 850 F.2d 207, 210 (4th Cir.1988) (filing of opposition to motion for summary judgment sanctionable under Rule 11); see also La Vay Corp. v. Do…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bakker v. Grutman
We conclude that Pavelic supports only the latter. 20 Rule 11 imposes upon substitute counsel a duty to investigate the legal and factual sufficiency of the claims he or she takes up; see Cabell, 810 F.2d at 466 ; Rachel v. Banana Republic, Inc., 831 F.2d 1503, 1508 (9th Cir.1987); but until substitute counsel files some paper indicating an intention to continue prosecution of the suit, such a decision will not be presumed by looking to the complaint itself. 4 See, e.g., Fahrenz v. Meadow Farm Partnership, 850 F.2d 207, 210 (4th Cir.1988) (filing of opposition to motion for summary judgment sa…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pablo De Leon Lopez v. Corporacion Insular De Seguros
See, e.g., Marshall v. Perez Arzuaga, 828 F.2d 845, 852 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1027 , 98 L.Ed.2d 991 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co., Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co.
As we have written: “Application of the legal cause standard to the circumstances of a particular case is a function ordinarily performed by, and peculiarly within the competence of, the factfinder.” Id.; see also Marshall v. Perez Arzuaga, 828 F.2d 845 , 850-51 & n. 8 (1st Cir.1987) (similar), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1065 , 108 S.Ct. 1027 , 98 L.Ed.2d 991 (1988); Springer v. Seamen, 821 F.2d 871, 876 (1st Cir.1987) (“[n]ot only ordinary fact questions, but also ‘evaluative applications of legal standards ... to the facts’ are properly [for the factfinder]”) (citations and footnote …
Thompson et ux.
v.
Hammond
v.
Hammond
No. 87-1073.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1988.
484 U.S. 1065
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Kentucky (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.