green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rishikof v. Mortada
See Moran v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 27 F.3d 169, 173 (5th Cir.1994) (citing Joseph v. Office of Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018 , 1025 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988)) (noting that the tortious activity exception to the' FSIA “requires a finding that the doctrine of respondent superior applies to the tortious act [ ] committed by the employee of the foreign state”).
cited
Cited "see"
Pemex Exploración Y Producción v. Murphy Energy Corp.
See Crocker v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 826 F.2d 347, 349 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1075 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderman v. Federal Republic of Austria
See Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.1987) (quoting Frolova, 761 F.2d at 377 ), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988); H.R.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Logan v. Dupuis
See Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria 830 F.2d 1018 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (FSIA governs landlord-tenant dispute where premises leased on behalf of foreign consulate; immunity of consular officer is determined by Vienna Convention on Consular Relations). 3 .See August 7, 1997 Letter from Mary Catherine Malin, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, docket no. 10-1 ("We understand that neither the government of Canada nor Mr. Du-puis intend tó take action with respect to [the] above referenced case____”) 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1995
See In re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litigation, 820 F.2d 982, 989 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, Konizeski v. Livermore Labs, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1076 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Whittier Wood Products Co.
See In re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litigation, 820 F.2d 982, 989 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, Konizeski v. Livermore Labs, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1076 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
7547 Corp. v. Parker & Parsley Development Partners, L.P.
See Crocker v. FDIC, 826 F.2d 347, 349 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1075 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Mary Lou Arrington Onley Pressley v. Thomas E. Duvoisin, Liquidating Trustee for Southern Industrial Banking Corporation, D/B/A Daveco
See Joseph v. Office of Consulate Gen., 830 F.2d 1018 , 1028 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 (1988); Parks v. Collins, 761 F.2d 1101, 1104 (5th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1994
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See In re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litig., 820 F.2d 982, 997-98 (9th Cir.1987) (discussing the policy factors implicated in the government's failure to warn participants in the United States atmospheric nuclear weapons testing program), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1076 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
C.R.S. ex rel. D.B.S. v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See In re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litig., 820 F.2d 982, 997-98 (9th Cir.1987) (discussing the policy factors implicated in the government’s failure to warn participants in the United States atmospheric nuclear weapons testing program), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1076 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald C. Cowell v. General Motors Corporation Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
See id. 8 Until 1979, Virginia adhered to the strict common law rule that the release of one joint tortfeasor operated as a release of all.
discussed
Cited "see"
O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
See, In re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litigation, *457 820 F.2d 982, 990 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, Konizeski v. Livermore Labs, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1076 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988); Hammond v. United States, 786 F.2d 8, 13-14 (1st Cir.1986); Sowell v. American Cyanamid Company, 888 F.2d 802 , 805 (11th Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Phoenix Baptist Hospital and Medical Center, Inc. v. United States
See In re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litig. v. Livermore Labs., 820 F.2d 982, 998-99 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1076 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Brooks v. Leonardo
See Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center (1987), 117 Ill. 2d 507, 524 , 513 N.E.2d 387 , cert. denied (1988), 485 U.S. 905 , 99 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1990
See Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.1987) (implicit waiver may be found where "a foreign state has filed a responsive pleading in a case without raising the defense of sovereign immunity.") (internal quotation omitted), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988). 55 We see no need to decide whether the Bank and the Guarantee Corporation have in fact waived sovereign immunity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chuidian v. Philippine National Bank
See Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.1987) (implicit waiver may be found where “a foreign state has filed a responsive pleading in a case without raising the defense of sovereign immunity.”) (internal quotation omitted), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roberts v. United States
See In re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litigation, 820 F.2d 982 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied sub nom., Konizeski v. Livermore Labs, [ 485 U.S. 905 ] 108 S.Ct. 1076 [ 99 L.Ed.2d 235 ] (1988); Allen v. United States, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, [ 484 U.S. 1004 ] 108 S.Ct. 694 [ 98 L.Ed.2d 647 ] (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorothy Roberts, W.C. Shepherd, Robert L. Gee, Carl Stephens v. United States of America, Louise Nunamaker v. United States
See In re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litigation, 820 F.2d 982 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied sub nom., Konizeski v. Livermore Labs, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1076 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988); Allen v. United States, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 694 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silicon Image, Inc. v. Genesis Microchip, Inc.
See Pinchback v. Armistead Homes Corp., 907 F.2d 1447, 1453 (4th Cir.1990) (holding that the "effect of the release on Pinchback’s federal [discrimination] claims against Armi-stead is a question of federal law” and interpreting the settlement agreement according to federal law); In re Complaint of Eastern Shore Diving & Marine Servs., 845 F.Supp. 371, 374 (E.D.Va.1994) (applying federal common law to determine the enforceability of a liability release); see also Auer v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., USA, 830 F.2d 535, 538 (4th Cir.1987) (upholding Gamewell but also holding that state law determi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Everett Todd Faber v. United States
See also In re Consolidated Atmospheric Testing, 820 F.2d 982, 990 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1076 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988) (the court applied the discretionary function exception, because the “decision whether to issue warnings to thousands of test participants of possibly life-threatening dangers [associated with nuclear radiation during the bombing of Hiroshima] ... calls for the exercise of judgment and discretion at high levels of government”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack Gerritsen v. Consulado General De Mexico
Gerritsen v. de la Madrid Hurtado, 819 F.2d 1511 (9th Cir.1987); see also Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Pfauter, Ltd. v. Freeman Decorating Co.
See, e.g., Kirk v. Michael Reese Hosp. & Medical Center, 117 Ill.2d 507, 526-27 , 111 Ill.Dec. 944 , 953, 513 N.E.2d 387, 396 (1987) (citing Leon Green, Foreseeability in Negligence Law, 61 Colum.L.Rev. 1401, 1423 (1961), for the proposition that a court’s determination to limit liability must “reflect[] the policy and social requirements of the time and community”), ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Margarito Salmon, Magdalena Salmon, Individually and as Next Friend for Margarito Salmon, Jr. v. Martin R. Schwarz and Arturo A. Gonzalez
See, e.g., In re Consolidated U.S. Atmospheric Testing Litigation, 820 F.2d 982, 991 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1076 , 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988) (Nuclear Energy Authorization Act); Hammond v. United States, 786 F.2d 8, 13-14 (1st Cir.1986) (Nuclear Energy Authorization Act); Carr v. United States, 422 F.2d 1007, 1010-11 (4th Cir.1970) (Federal Drivers Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miguel Santos v. Compagnie Nationale Air France
See Callejo v. Bancomer, S.A., 764 F.2d 1101, 1109 (5th Cir.1985) (stating that “the emphasis should be on the elements of the cause of action itself” in determining jurisdiction under the Immunities Act); Gilson v. Republic of Ireland, 682 F.2d 1022 , 1027 n. 22 (D.C.Cir.1982) (stating that jurisdiction would be present if the plaintiff could show conduct in the United States that would be “an element of the cause of action under whatever law governs his claims”); see also Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General, 830 F.2d 1018 ,1023 (,9th Cir.1987) (stating, “In determining whethe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weltover, Inc. v. Republic of Argentina
See 748 F.2d at 797 ; see also Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1024 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988); House Report, supra, at 16, 1984 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News at 6615 ("Certainly, if an activity is customarily carried on for profit, its commercial nature could readily be assumed.”). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kendra Summers, a Minor, and Frederick J. Summers, Guardian Ad Litem v. United States
There was nothing in the record to indicate that the failure to provide signs resulted from a decision grounded in economic, social, or political policy and we doubted that any decision not to provide adequate signs would be “of the nature and quality Congress intended to shield from liability.” 832 F.2d at 123 ; see also Camozzi v. United States, 866 F.2d 287 (9th Cir.1989). 1 *1216 Contrary to the government’s assertions, our conclusion here creates no conflict with our previous decisions in Kennewick and In re Consolidated Atmospheric Testing (“Atmospheric Testing”), 820 F.2d 982 …
Reddington
v.
Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services
v.
Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. 87-875.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 29, 1988.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.