green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Sebastian International, Inc. v. Russolillo
See United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 660 (9th Cir.1988) cert. denied 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dean
See United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 854-55, n. 11 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989). 1 In United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989), the court applied the Eighth Amendment to a defendant’s claim that his overall sentence, which included an order of restitution, was excessive.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Eugene Allen
See United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 665 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore Edmonds
(2×)
See United States v. Castro, 887 F.2d 988, 993 (9th Cir.1989) ("A unanimity instruction as to the particular objects of a charged conspiracy is appropriate where it appears that a conviction might rest upon different jurors having found the existence of different facts ...."); accord United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 653 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edmonds
See United States v. Castro, 887 F.2d 988, 993 (9th Cir. 1989) ("A unanimity instruction as to the particular objects of a charged conspiracy is appropriate where it appears that a conviction might rest upon different jurors having found the existence of different facts . . . ."); accord United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 653 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1994
See United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 652 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 (1989). 10 Appellants argue that counsel for Quintero and Gomez gave erroneous explanations of reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. William Benton Cunningham, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 653 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 (1989) (no unanimity instruction required even though defendant's actions to conceal insurance proceeds were convoluted to mislead creditors in scheme to defraud).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roberto Martinez, United States of America v. Roberto Martinez
See United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 654 (9th Cir.1988), cert, denied, 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1991
Compare United States v. Bledsoe, 674 F.2d 647, 665 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1040 , 103 S.Ct. 456 , 74 L.Ed.2d 608 (1982), with United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); see United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 659-60 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Humberto Bosch, Sr.
See United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 666 (9th Cir.1988) (failure to request specific instructions does not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel when court’s instructions were adequate), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeWit v. Firstar Corp.
Atlas Pile Driving, 886 F.2d at 995 n. 7 (citing United States v. Perholtz, 842 F.2d 343, 353 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 821 , 109 S.Ct. 65 , 102 L.Ed.2d 42 (1988)); see also United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 655 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989) (holding that a RICO enterprise may consist of individuals associated in fact with corporations); Console, 13 F.3d at 652 (association in fact may be association of legal entities, or composed of legal as well as non-legal entities).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jennifer Susan Edelman, United States of America v. Harold J. Edelman
In reviewing the evidence, we "must respect the exclusive province of the jury to determine the credibility of witnesses, resolve evidentiary conflicts, and draw reasonable inferences from proven facts." United States v. Ramos, 558 F.2d 545, 546 (9th Cir.1977); see also United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 654 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 (1989). 20 Section 1001 proscribes "the making of material false representations to a government agency regarding a matter within the agency's discretion." United States v. Vaughn, 797 F.2d 1485, 1490 (9th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwin Elgersma
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 661-62 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989); 1984 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News at 3393 (new forfeiture provisions parallel to amended RICO forfeiture) 19 Due process allows district courts to make factual determinations at sentencing by a preponderance of the evidence.
Scott
v.
Dantes, Chairman, Maryland Parole Commission
v.
Dantes, Chairman, Maryland Parole Commission
No. 88-6233.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1989.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.