green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 1 distinct case ·
“We find that mere delegation of authority does not detract from [the defendant’s] ultimate status as organizer”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Humberto Hinojosa and Carlos Lerma
we find that mere delegation of authority does not detract from ultimate status as organizer
cited
Cited "see"
Fisher v. United States
See United States v. Alvarez, 860 F.2d 801, 818 (7th Cir.1988) cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1966 , 104 L.Ed.2d 434 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Henderson and Leroy Nolan
See United States v. Alvarez, 860 F.2d 801, 809 (7th Cir.1988) (voice identification by unbelievable witnesses goes to the weight of the evidence), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1966 , 104 L.Ed.2d 434 (1989), vacated on other grounds, 956 F.2d 1165 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Alvarez, 860 F.2d 801, 829 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1966 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Dillon
See generally Peabody Coal Co. v. State, 158 Ariz. 190 , 761 P.2d 1094 (App.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1967 , 104 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John F. Rosch
See, e.g., U.S. v. Cooper, 685 F.Supp. 179, 180-81 (N.D.Ill.1988), aff'd 869 F.2d 1495 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 (1989) (commenting that although the defendant's "admirable behavior [in prison] will undoubtedly enhance [his] chances for parole ... [it] does nothing to undermine the underlying rationale for [his] sentence."); U.S. v. Finley, 783 F.Supp. 1123, 1125 (N.D.Ill.1991) (refusing to reduce the defendant's ten year sentence to less than eight years despite his wife's terminal breast cancer). 23 C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lupe Gomez
(2×)
It places on the defendant the burden of asserting a violation of the statute, explicitly providing that the “[fjailure of the defendant to move for dismissal prior to trial or entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere shall constitute a waiver of the right to dismissal under this section.” Id. (emphasis added); see United States v. McKinnell, 888 F.2d 669, 676 (10th Cir.1989) (holding that even if defendant had been “entitled to relief under section 3161(a)(2) [sic], he waived his rights to that relief by his failure to move for dismissal prior to trial”); see also United States v.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred Saulter and Ilander Willis
See Henderson, 58 F.3d at 1149 ; see also United States v. Alvarez, 860 F.2d 801, 809 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1966 , 104 L.Ed.2d 434 (1989), vacated on other grounds, 956 F.2d 1165 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Derrick Stanton
Stanton concedes that trial testimony established his possession of a firearm but argues that there was insufficient evidence to show that the weapon "played a direct role in the conspiracy or that it was ever intended to be used to protect any drugs." See United States v. Woods, 995 F.2d 713, 718 (7th Cir.1993) (strategically placing or carrying a gun to protect drugs or money constitutes use under Sec. 924(c)); see also United States v. Alvarez, 860 F.2d 801, 830 (7th Cir.1988), modified, 868 F.2d 201 , cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 (1989) (guns are recognized tools of the drug trafficking tra…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Plummer v. Springfield Terminal
Co., 880 F.2d 68, 73-74 (8th Cir. 1989); ____________________________ Eastridge Development Co. v. Halpert Associates, 853 F.2d 772 , __________________________ __________________ 783 (10th Cir. 1988); see also Robles v. Exxon Corp., 862 F.2d ________ ______ ___________ 1201, 1207-08 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 _____________ (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Plummer v. Springfield Terminal
Co., 880 F.2d 68, 73-74 (8th Cir. 1989); Eastridge Development Co. v. Halpert Associates, 853 F.2d 772, 783 (10th Cir. 1988); see also Robles v. Exxon Corp., 862 F.2d 1201, 1207-08 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald Plummer v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company
Co., 880 F.2d 68, 73-74 (8th Cir.1989); Eastridge Development Co. v. Halpert Associates, 853 F.2d 772, 783 (10th Cir.1988); see also Robles v. Exxon Corp., 862 F.2d 1201, 1207-08 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1967 , 104 L.Ed.2d 434 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SELF-INSURANCE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Claire KORIOTH, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
See id.; see also ANR Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Comm’n of Okla., 860 F.2d 1571, 1575-77 (10th Cir.1988) (jurisdiction exists under § 1331 in eases seeking declaratory and injunctive relief challenging constitutionality of state statute), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1967 , 104 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989); cf. Lowe v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, 723 F.2d 1173 , 1180-81 n. 7 (5th Cir.1984) (general federal question jurisdiction absent because no injunctive relief was sought and no allegation of state action was made).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1993
See also McGrath v. Kristensen, 340 U.S. 162 , 71 S.Ct. 224 , 95 L.Ed. 173 (1950). 20 In ANR Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Com'n, 860 F.2d 1571 , 1579 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1967 , 104 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989), we stated that standing is analyzed with two inquiries: "(a) whether the plaintiff alleges that the challenged action has caused him injury in fact (economic or otherwise), and (b) whether the interest sought to be protected by the plaintiff is arguably within the zone of interests to be protected or regulated by the statute or constitutional guarantee in quest…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Self-Insurance Institute of America, Inc. v. Korioth
See id.; see also ANR Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla., 860 F.2d 1571, 1575-77 (10th Cir.1988) (jurisdiction exists under § 1331 in cases seeking declaratory and injunctive relief challenging constitutionality of state statute), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1967 , 104 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989); cf. Lowe v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, 723 F.2d 1173 , 1180-81 n. 7 (5th Cir.1984) (general federal question jurisdiction absent because no injunctive relief was sought and no allegation of state action was made).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Ernest Detrich, Ahmad Shah Nusraty, Mohammed Dawood Nusraty, Robert Ernest Detrich
See, e.g., United States v. Colon-Ortiz, 866 F.2d 6, 9-10 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1966 , 104 L.Ed.2d 434 (1989); see also United States v. Bedoya, 909 F.2d 55, 57 (2d Cir.1990) (Section 960(b)(2) imposes a “mandatory five-year term of imprisonment”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Munn v. Algee
See also Robles v. Exxon Corp., 862 F.2d 1201, 1204 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1967 , 104 L.Ed.2d 434 (1989); Nance v. Gulf Oil Corp., 817 F.2d 1176, 1178 (5th Cir.1987); Perricone v. Kansas City S. Ry., 704 F.2d 1376, 1379 (5th Cir.1983). .
Daroti-Lagos, aka Lagos-Daroti
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-6894.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 1, 1989.
490 U.S. 1051
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.