green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“The purpose of an amendment must be taken into account when considering prosecution history estoppel.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Allen v. United States
it is well-settled that oral argument is not necessary to satisfy due process.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hymas v. United States
it is well-settled that oral argument is not necessary to satisfy due process.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Christian Activities Council, Congregational v. Town Council
t is axiomatic that courts are required to read a statute in light of its puipose
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
The Laitram Corporation v. Nec Corporation, Nec Information Systems, Inc., and Sears, Roebuck and Company
the purpose of an amendment must be taken into account when considering prosecution history estoppel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hugo Vizcarra
United States v. Schmidt, 947 F.2d 362, 371 (9th Cir.1991); accord United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 706 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 (1988). 7 A. Probable Cause. 8 Vizcarra argues that the affidavit supporting the search warrant issued for the load vehicle lacked probable cause.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Naplin, United States of America v. Wayne Newsom
See United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 705 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Kelly, United States of America v. Terrence M. Nikrasch
See United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 (1988). 8 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell R. George, AKA Rusty, and Pamela A. Johnson-Sherman, Francis R. Lajoice
See United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 706 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 312 , 102 L.Ed.2d 331 (1988); United States v. Accardo, 749 F.2d 1477, 1481 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 949 , 106 S.Ct. 314 , 88 L.Ed.2d 295 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. W. Eldon Riley and Marietta L. Riley, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants
See Geear v. Boulder Community Hosp., 844 F.2d 764, 766 (10th Cir.) (parties' right to be heard under Rule 56 fulfilled by trial court's review of the briefs and supporting materials submitted to court), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 (1988). 8 The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED. 9 The mandate shall issue forthwith. * This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lancelot Fitz-Roy Green
See United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 707 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
James Carmel, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Emil Stavriotis and Judith Stavriotis v. Clapp & Eisenberg, P.C., and Gerald Litwin
See Broad v. Conway, 675 F.Supp. 768 (N.D.N.Y.1987), aff 'd without op., 849 F.2d 1467 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 313 , 102 L.Ed.2d 331 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Signet Bank v. Eric Edward Keyes April Elaine Keyes
See Geear v. Boulder Community Hosp., 844 F.2d 764, 766 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernesto Jose Lopez
Thus, for a defendant to establish her entitlement to a Franks hearing, or to the suppression of evidence flowing from the execution of a purportedly faulty search warrant, she must demonstrate not only that the affidavit supporting the issuance of the warrant contained false statements, but also that the statements were "deliberately or recklessly included in the affidavit and ... [were] material to the magistrate's finding of probable cause...." United States v. Motz, 936 F.2d 1021, 1023 (9th Cir.1991); accord United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 705 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 …
cited
Cited "see"
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.
See Andrew Corp. v. Gabriel Electronics, Inc., 847 F.2d 819, 823 (Fed.Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 312 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988). *1495 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vince Lee Motz, United States of America v. Joseph Arlen Langer
United States v. Burnes, 816 F.2d 1354 , *1024 1357 (9th Cir.1987) (quoting Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2676-77 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978)); see United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 705 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 312 , 102 L.Ed.2d 331 (1988) (defendant must prove by preponderance of evidence that there was knowing and intentional falsehood or reckless disregard for truth and that challenged statement was essential to finding probable cause).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick Joseph Greany
See United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 706-07 (9th Cir.) (citing United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573, 583-84 , 91 S.Ct. 2075, 2081-82 , 29 L.Ed.2d 723 (1971)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 312 , 102 L.Ed.2d 331 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anchorage Associates v. Virgin Islands Board of Tax Review
See Geear v. Boulder Community Hospital, 844 F.2d 764, 766 (10th Cir.) (where non-moving party failed to respond to motion for summary judgment within time period provided by local rule, district court review of briefs and other materials submitted in support of motion satisfied "hearing” requirement of Rule 56), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 312 , 102 L.Ed.2d 331 (1988); Donaldson v. Clark, 819 F.2d 1551, 1555 (11th Cir.1987) ("Rule 56 does not require 'that an oral hearing be held on a summary judgment motion”); Langham-Hill Petroleum Inc. v. Southern Fuels Co., 813 F.2d 1327 (4…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pelham
See United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 707 (9th Cir.) (finding probable cause to search for documentary records despite five-and-one-half-month delay), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 312 , 102 L.Ed.2d 331 (1988); United States v. Jacobs, 715 F.2d 1343, 1346 (9th Cir.1983) (finding probable cause to search for articles of clothing despite three-and-one-half-month delay); United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003, 1005-06 (10th Cir.1977) (finding probable cause to search for radio equipment and documents despite eleven-month delay), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anderson
See, e.g., United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 707 (9th Cir.) (Mere lapse of time not controlling where there is a reason why evidence may remain at the premises), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 312 , 102 L.Ed.2d 331 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Domitrovich
See, e.g., United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 705 (9th Cir.1988) (affiant overstated extent of defendant’s prior convictions, and included fact which affiant’s investigation had shown to be untrue), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 312 , 102 L.Ed.2d 331 (1988); United States v. Miller, 753 F.2d 1475, 1478 (9th Cir.1985) (affiant faded to uncover informant’s perjury conviction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Anthony Ruggio
"When the evidence sought is of an ongoing criminal business of a necessarily long-term nature, such as marijuana growing, rather than that of a completed act, greater lapses of time are permitted if the evidence in the affidavit shows the probable existence of the activity at an earlier time." Greany, 929 F.2d at 525 ; see also United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 707 (9th Cir.) ("marijuana cultivation is a long-term crime"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 (1988). 11 Therefore, the passage of fifteen months does not necessarily make the information stale, when that information concerns marijuan…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Thompson
See Jardine, 118 Idaho at 291 , 796 P.2d at 168 (discussing standard of review for United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule); see also United States v. Dozier, 844 F.2d 701, 705 (9th Cir.1988) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 312 , 102 L.Ed.2d 331 (1988) (question whether misstatements or omissions are material to a finding of probable cause is subject to de novo review).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vaughn
Ed. 2d 151 (1965); see also State v. Rodo, 14 Conn. App. 322, 330 , 541 A.2d 124 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 813 , 546 A.2d 282 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 927 , 109 S. Ct. 311 , 102 L.
Payne
v.
Gannon
v.
Gannon
No. 88-460.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1988.
Ct. App. Tex., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.