green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
13.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Kent
However, it appears from the record that some of the requested discovery items, including the gas chromatography worksheets, were supplied before trial to defense counsel, who, in turn, supplied those documents to his expert. [11] The stay of defendant's sentence has apparently continued. [12] See e.g., State v. King, 213 Ariz. 632 , 146 P. 3d 1274, 1276 (App.2006) (applying the Crawford test to the admission of defendant's prior convictions at his drunk driving trial, but finding such court records were not testimonial); Belvin v. State, 922 So. 2d 1046, 1050-54 (Fla.App. 4 Dist.), review gra…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Dooley
as a general consideration, there is every reason to suppose that mature family members possess the authority to admit police to look about the family residence, since in common experience family members have the run of the house
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. PORTER P.
(2×)
as a general consideration, there is every reason to suppose that mature family members possess the authority to admit police to look about the family residence, since in common experience family members have the run of the house
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Early
ourts are understandably reluctant to approve third-party consent searches of an enclosed space in which the family member targeted for the search has-clearly manifested an expectation of exclusivity.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Hermann
See Minn.Stat. § 507.02; see generally United States v. Certain Real Property Located at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 351 (6th Cir.1990) (stating that “the Government may properly acquire only the interest which Mr. Marks held as cotenant by the entireties ... [but] cannot occupy the position of Mr. Marks in the .entireties estate, since the estate is founded on marital union, and the Government obviously cannot assume the role of spouse to Mrs. Marks”), cert. denied, Marks v. United States, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gutierrez-Hermosillo
See United States v. Clutter, 914 F.2d 775, 778 (6th Cir.1990) (holding that twelve— and fourteen-year-old boys could grant access), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1413 , 113 L.Ed.2d 466 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Neilson
See United States v. Clutter, 914 F.2d 775, 779 (6th Cir. 1990), cert, denied, 499 U.S. 947 (1991); United States v. Roberts, 644 F.2d 683, 688 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 821 (1980); United States v. Bomengo, 580 F.2d 173, 175-176 (5th Cir. 1978), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 1117 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ann O'Hagan v. United States
See Minn. Stat. § 507.02 ; see generally United States v. Certain Real Property Located at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 351 (6th Cir. 1990) (stating that "the Government may properly acquire only the interest which Mr. Marks held as cotenant by the entireties . . . [but] cannot occupy the position of Mr. Marks in the entireties estate, since the estate is founded on marital union, and the Government obviously cannot assume the role of spouse to Mrs. Marks"), cert. denied, Marks v. United States, 499 U.S. 947 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ann H. O'Hagan v. United States
(2×)
See Minn.Stat. § 507.02; see generally United States v. Certain Real Property Located at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 351 (6th Cir.1990) (stating that “the Government may properly acquire only the interest which Mr. Marks held as cotenant by the entireties ... [but] cannot occupy the position of Mr. Marks in the entireties estate, since the estate is founded on marital union, and the Government obviously cannot assume the role of spouse to Mrs. Marks”), cert. denied, Marks v. United States, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
ca4 1996
See United States v. Certain Real Property at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 347-49 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.
See United States v. Certain Real Property at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 347-49 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carolina Chemical Equipment Co. v. Muckenfuss
(2×)
See Eden Hannon & Co. v. Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co., 914 F.2d 556 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lyman Hollingsworth
Criminal forfeiture is based upon in personam jurisdiction over the defendant, and the district court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant based on the criminal charge and conviction against him. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 , 853; see United States v. Certain Real Property Located at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 346 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sms Associates v. Ozzie Clay
See Ramey v. Bowsher, 915 F.2d 731, 736 (D.C.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 (1991). 3 The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.
cited
Cited "see"
Lenz v. Winburn
See United States v. Clutter, 914 F.2d 775, 778 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1413 , 113 L.Ed.2d 466 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Lenz v. Winburn
See United States v. Clutter, 914 F.2d 775, 778 (6th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1413 , 113 L.Ed.2d 466 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Protective Insurance v. Cody
See Wilson v. Humphreys (Cayman) Ltd., 916 F.2d 1239, 1243 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1415 , 113 L.Ed.2d 468 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lunde v. Helms
See Easley v. University of Michigan Board of Regents, 906 F.2d 1143, 1146-47 (6th Cir.1990) (judge’s graduation from and affiliation with law school, which was party defendant, not grounds for recusal, absent evidence that judge was privy to extrajudicial information relating to student’s situation at law school), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991); Brody v. President of Harvard College, 664 F.2d 10, 11 (1st Cir.1981) (per curiam) (judge’s having attended or graduated from university which was party to case, without more, not grounds for recusal), cert.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lunde v. Helms
See Easley v. University of Michigan Board of Regents, 906 F.2d 1143, 1146-47 (6th Cir.1990) (judge's graduation from and affiliation with law school, which was party defendant, not grounds for recusal, absent evidence that judge was privy to extrajudicial information relating to student's situation at law school), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991); Brody v. President of Harvard College, 664 F.2d 10, 11 (1st Cir.1981) (per curiam) (judge's having attended or graduated from university which was party to case, without more, not grounds for recusal), cert. denie…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. White
See Work v. State, 111 N.M. 145, 147 , 803 P.2d 234, 236 (1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1413 , 113 L.Ed.2d 466 (1991); State v. Grissom, 106 N.M. 555, 562 , 746 P.2d 661, 668 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 106 N.M. 439 , 744 P.2d 912 (1987), and criticized on other grounds in Salandre, 111 N.M. at 430-31 , 806 P.2d at 570-71 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoover v. Suffolk University
See Easley v. University of Michigan Bd. of Regents, 906 F.2d 1143 (6th Cir. 1990) (judge not required to recuse himself from suit against law school where judge was an alumnus of the law school, served as a volunteer fund raiser for the law school, and was on the law school's visiting committee), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 (1991); Brody v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 664 F.2d 10, 11-12 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1027 (1982). 12 Denial of Leave to Amend and Supplement the Complaint 13 Hoover's notice of appeal challenges only the district court's September 7, 1993 orde…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoover v. Suffolk University
See Easley v. University of Michigan Bd. of ___ ______ ________________________________ Regents, 906 F.2d 1143 (6th Cir. 1990) (judge not required to _______ recuse himself from suit against law school where judge was an alumnus of the law school, served as a volunteer fund raiser for the law school, and was on the law school's visiting committee), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 (1991); Brody v. President & Fellows ____________ _____ ____________________ of Harvard College, 664 F.2d 10, 11-12 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. __________________ _____ denied, 455 U.S. 1027 (1982). ______ Denial of Leave to Am…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tanner
See United States v. Certain Real Property at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 350 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991); see also Reckmeyer, 836 F.2d at 208 (relation-back doctrine not intended to allow courts to invalidate “ ‘arms-length’ ” transaction) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1994
See United States v. Certain Real Property at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 349 (6th Cir.1990) (discussing federal forfeiture statutes), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991); see also Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe, 442 U.S. 653, 676 , 99 S.Ct. 2529, 2542 , 61 L.Ed.2d 153 (1979) (finding that state property law controlled title dispute between Indian and non-Indian claimants to land even though issue was ultimately one of federal law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Black Hills Institute of Geological Research v. South Dakota School of Mines & Technology
See United States v. Certain Real Property at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 349 (6th Cir.1990) (discussing federal forfeiture statutes), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991); see also Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe, 442 U.S. 653, 676 , 99 S.Ct. 2529, 2542 , 61 L.Ed.2d 153 (1979) (finding that state property law controlled title dispute between Indian and non-Indian claimants to land even though issue was ultimately one of federal law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dur-A-Flex, Inc. v. Dy
See, e.g., Eden Hannon & Co. v. Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co., 914 F.2d 556 , 561–62 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S. Ct. 1414 , 113 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moran
Court Rules, Appendix to Part VII to R. 7:3-2 at 2309 (2010); see also State v. Hamm, 121 N.J. 109, 124 , 577 A.2d 1259 (1990) (eschewing “outworn distinction” whether driving is right or privilege), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1413 , 113 L.Ed.2d 466 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCloud v. Potter
See also, Ramey v. Bowsher, 915 F.2d 731, 734 (D.C.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1413 , 113 L.Ed.2d 466 (1991); Lamb v. United States Postal Service, 852 F.2d 845, 846 (5th Cir.1988); White v. GSA 652 F.2d 913, 916-17 (9th Cir.1981). 6.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hatchett v. Internal Revenue Service
See also United States v. Certain Real Property Located at 2525 Leroy Lane, 910 F.2d 343, 347-48 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1414 , 113 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991); Cole v. Cardoza, 441 F.2d 1337, 1343 (6th Cir.1971). “ ‘[O]nce it has been determined that state law creates sufficient interest in the [taxpayer] to satisfy the requirements of [the statute], state law is inoperative,’ and the tax consequences thenceforth are dictated by federal law.” Id. (quoting United States v. National Bank of Commerce, 472 U.S. 713, 722 , 105 S.Ct. 2919 , 86 L.Ed.2d 565 (1985) and Be…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ball
See, e.g., United States v. *170 Woods, 915 F.2d 854, 862-64 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1413, 113 L.Ed.2d 466 (1991); United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1178-80 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990); United States v. Van Dorn, 925 F.2d 1331 , 1334 n. 2 (11th Cir.1991); United States v. Glecier, 923 F.2d 496, 497 n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 810 , 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); United States v. Coiro, 922 F.2d 1008, 1017 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2826 , 115 L.Ed.2d 996 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See, e. g., Eden Hannon & Co. v. Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co., 914 F. 2d 556, 564-565 (CA4 1990), cert. denied, 499 U. S. 947 (1991); South Dakota v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc., 880 F. 2d 40, 54 (CA8 1989), cert. denied sub nom.
Iannacone
v.
New Jersey
v.
New Jersey
No. 90-719.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 1991.
499 U.S. 947
Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.